Jump to content

Anyone Got A 12.5 Barrel On There. 22 Rimy


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

There's a good reason 'most' rimfires are made or cut down later to 14" or 16", at least this 'my' engineers take on it.

The twist rate of the rifling in a rimfire is almost always 1 in 14, so it would seem to make sense (to me) to get the bullet to

turn at least 1 revolution when passing through the barrel?

My Sako Finnfire is however different (I researched this first), it's 1 in 16, so when I had it shortened from the 22" factory length,

bearing in mind my theory about twist rate, I figured that the case on a 22 rimfire is 1/2" so the rifled 'bit' should be 16" at least,

so I asked for it to be shortened from breech face to end ay 16 1/2". This works very well for me.

I think 12" is too short, but then again plenty of 22 rimfire handguns have barrels only 2" to 4" long and they do OK.

Link to post

Don't worry at all, 14" is plenty of barrel, at 14" all the powder is burned off and the bullet is now starting to 'slow down' in

the barrel that's left!

I can only comment on my experience, both with a factory 16" 17hmr and my Sako Varmint.

The CZ 17 American was very accurate, the cartridge (in my opinion) was over rated and expensive to feed, the factory ammo

was really crap, with too many primer only, bullet stopped 3" up the barrel, plus runner Foxes needing a second or more shot,

reverted to a 22.250 and no complaints thereafter.

My Sako will group at 3 shots under 1/2" at 75 yards with GECO 40gr Target, off a bipod with no wind from a 16 1/2"

barrel, and about 3/4" with RWS sub's, which is no worse than when it was 22".

  • Like 1
Link to post

I read an interesting book about 10/22s. This american guy progressively cut 1/2" sections off his 10/22 and noted the accuracy and velocities at each successive length. His figures showed that in fact 12 1/2" is the ideal length for that model of .22 rimfire.

Link to post

There's a good reason 'most' rimfires are made or cut down later to 14" or 16", at least this 'my' engineers take on it.

The twist rate of the rifling in a rimfire is almost always 1 in 14, so it would seem to make sense (to me) to get the bullet to turn at least 1 revolution when passing through the barrel?

 

 

I can't really think why getting one full rotation in the barrel would be important? Surely it's the rate of rotation that is important, which should be independent of barrel length? Interesting hypothesis if it is right, I just can't think why it should be.....

Edited by Born Hunter
Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...