Born Hunter 17,638 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Share Posted September 7, 2015 I'm very thankful these special operations don't go through parliament. While the politicians are arguing over the rights and wrongs of killing threats to the nation the wrong side of a border, the threats have f****d off. I have complete faith in the men and women that are tasked with finding these threats and I'm thankful Cameron had the savvy to sort it on the quiet. Just as any other government with a shred of back bone would have. Certain military actions loose all effectiveness if the Commons have to give them the nod before hand. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
staffs riffraff 1,068 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Share Posted September 7, 2015 yeah there on about bombing isis AND Assad, wankers there true to the saying that eton boys club "more than one way to skin a cat" and assads people defending themselves from some of the most evil men ever to have walked the earth and isis 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Truther 1,579 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Share Posted September 7, 2015 I'm very thankful these special operations don't go through parliament. While the politicians are arguing over the rights and wrongs of killing threats to the nation the wrong side of a border, the threats have f****d off. I have complete faith in the men and women that are tasked with finding these threats and I'm thankful Cameron had the savvy to sort it on the quiet. Just as any other government with a shred of back bone would have. Certain military actions loose all effectiveness if the Commons have to give them the nod before hand. It went through parliament 2 years ago, and the man from del monte, he say f***ing no sunshine, chuck a load of muzz immigrants at us and it's KILL ALL THEM MUTHA FUKKERS Camerons a f***ing idiot, he couldn't sort you pie and peas out I think i'll have a round robin now i seem to be on a roll....................Assad being ousted, UK staying in the EU, and Corbyn winning the leadership........wonder what odds i'd get? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,638 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Share Posted September 7, 2015 I'm very thankful these special operations don't go through parliament. While the politicians are arguing over the rights and wrongs of killing threats to the nation the wrong side of a border, the threats have f****d off. I have complete faith in the men and women that are tasked with finding these threats and I'm thankful Cameron had the savvy to sort it on the quiet. Just as any other government with a shred of back bone would have. Certain military actions loose all effectiveness if the Commons have to give them the nod before hand. It went through parliament 2 years ago, and the man from del monte, he say f***ing no sunshine, chuck a load of muzz immigrants at us and it's KILL ALL THEM MUTHA FUKKERS Camerons a f***ing idiot, he couldn't sort you pie and peas out I think i'll have a round robin now i seem to be on a roll....................Assad being ousted, UK staying in the EU, and Corbyn winning the leadership........wonder what odds i'd get? Oh, so because parliament voted against bombing Assad on humanitarian grounds, that means we are to never engage legitimate threats to the UK in Syria? They're two completely separate things. These assassinations were an act of defence, the intervention discussed two years ago was never about defence. Absolutely nothing has changed, the Cabinet have the legal power to order military action without or even against parliamentary approval. In the case of defending the country from direct or immediate threats I completely approve. f**k waiting on parliament when opportunities arise to deal with threats. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brewman 1,190 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Share Posted September 7, 2015 I will say a prayer for them tonight....... Please God may they burn in hell for eternity while being permanently raped by a gang of saddleback prize porkers(tastiest bacon ever) that are hung like donkeys. Amen 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted September 7, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2015 (edited) I'm very thankful these special operations don't go through parliament. While the politicians are arguing over the rights and wrongs of killing threats to the nation the wrong side of a border, the threats have f****d off. I have complete faith in the men and women that are tasked with finding these threats and I'm thankful Cameron had the savvy to sort it on the quiet. Just as any other government with a shred of back bone would have. Certain military actions loose all effectiveness if the Commons have to give them the nod before hand.Agreed. I would rather have a PM that took them out, when he had the chance, rather than one who tries to explain why people died because he had to get prior approval to attack our enemies. I'm sure some would trot out the old 'if I was PM, we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place', but you can only deal with what it is, not what you'd like it to be. Edited September 8, 2015 by Blackbriar 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brewman 1,190 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Share Posted September 7, 2015 Prevention is better than cure... Kill 'em all Let God sort them out. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted September 7, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2015 (edited) I'm very thankful these special operations don't go through parliament. While the politicians are arguing over the rights and wrongs of killing threats to the nation the wrong side of a border, the threats have f****d off. I have complete faith in the men and women that are tasked with finding these threats and I'm thankful Cameron had the savvy to sort it on the quiet. Just as any other government with a shred of back bone would have. Certain military actions loose all effectiveness if the Commons have to give them the nod before hand. It went through parliament 2 years ago, and the man from del monte, he say f***ing no sunshine, chuck a load of muzz immigrants at us and it's KILL ALL THEM MUTHA FUKKERS Camerons a f***ing idiot, he couldn't sort you pie and peas out I think i'll have a round robin now i seem to be on a roll....................Assad being ousted, UK staying in the EU, and Corbyn winning the leadership........wonder what odds i'd get? Save your money.Assad will remain for the foreseeable future.He's got the Russians behind him, and we've done a really good job of telling them what's what, haven't we ? Theyre trying to get some concessions from him, but dont hold your breath. The EU referendum is still tight, but votes usually go with the status quo (societies are generally resistant to massive change), and Jeremy Corbyn is absolutely not going to win (but Yvette Cooper probably is)......that's my accumulator ! (Though we are agreed that Cameron is an idiot !) Edited September 7, 2015 by Blackbriar 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Truther 1,579 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Share Posted September 7, 2015 I'm very thankful these special operations don't go through parliament. While the politicians are arguing over the rights and wrongs of killing threats to the nation the wrong side of a border, the threats have f****d off. I have complete faith in the men and women that are tasked with finding these threats and I'm thankful Cameron had the savvy to sort it on the quiet. Just as any other government with a shred of back bone would have. Certain military actions loose all effectiveness if the Commons have to give them the nod before hand. It went through parliament 2 years ago, and the man from del monte, he say f***ing no sunshine, chuck a load of muzz immigrants at us and it's KILL ALL THEM MUTHA FUKKERS Camerons a f***ing idiot, he couldn't sort you pie and peas out I think i'll have a round robin now i seem to be on a roll....................Assad being ousted, UK staying in the EU, and Corbyn winning the leadership........wonder what odds i'd get? Oh, so because parliament voted against bombing Assad on humanitarian grounds, that means we are to never engage legitimate threats to the UK in Syria? They're two completely separate things. These assassinations were an act of defence, the intervention discussed two years ago was never about defence. Absolutely nothing has changed, the Cabinet have the legal power to order military action without or even against parliamentary approval. In the case of defending the country from direct or immediate threats I completely approve. f**k waiting on parliament when opportunities arise to deal with threats. They're testing the water you numpty, was this c**t even killed when and how they're saying, we'll never know? kill the lot for me, i don't give a f**k, wish they'd start here though. Lets see how my round robin turns out? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mickey Finn 2,710 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 So, the world has changed, and we must change with it. Nice going RAF! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,638 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 (edited) I'm very thankful these special operations don't go through parliament. While the politicians are arguing over the rights and wrongs of killing threats to the nation the wrong side of a border, the threats have f****d off. I have complete faith in the men and women that are tasked with finding these threats and I'm thankful Cameron had the savvy to sort it on the quiet. Just as any other government with a shred of back bone would have. Certain military actions loose all effectiveness if the Commons have to give them the nod before hand. It went through parliament 2 years ago, and the man from del monte, he say f***ing no sunshine, chuck a load of muzz immigrants at us and it's KILL ALL THEM MUTHA FUKKERS Camerons a f***ing idiot, he couldn't sort you pie and peas out I think i'll have a round robin now i seem to be on a roll....................Assad being ousted, UK staying in the EU, and Corbyn winning the leadership........wonder what odds i'd get? Oh, so because parliament voted against bombing Assad on humanitarian grounds, that means we are to never engage legitimate threats to the UK in Syria? They're two completely separate things. These assassinations were an act of defence, the intervention discussed two years ago was never about defence.Absolutely nothing has changed, the Cabinet have the legal power to order military action without or even against parliamentary approval. In the case of defending the country from direct or immediate threats I completely approve. f**k waiting on parliament when opportunities arise to deal with threats. They're testing the water you numpty, was this c**t even killed when and how they're saying, we'll never know? kill the lot for me, i don't give a f**k, wish they'd start here though. Lets see how my round robin turns out? Did I say they weren't, you wazzock. Lol You can keep your round Robin, it's not really that insightful. The western powers want Assad out, nothing new there. He's on their list but proving problematic. The Russians might just cost you though, they've just raised the odds in this game of poker and I don't think anybody has the bollocks to match them. None of that changes the fact that the drone strike in question was NOT against the will of parliaments vote 2 years ago, was legal under our constitution and if anything was in support of the Assad regime. Not that Cameron would have liked that last bit. You and me both wish they'd start here! I said when this all kicked off, I'd be quite happy to see half the doors in Birmingham being kicked in and these fuckers executed in their beds. But realistically that wasn't going to happen.... when they started going to Syria though they became far more legitimate targets. I saw it as a good thing, as long as someone had the bollocks to take advantage of it. Edited September 8, 2015 by Born Hunter 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Truther 1,579 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 I'm very thankful these special operations don't go through parliament. While the politicians are arguing over the rights and wrongs of killing threats to the nation the wrong side of a border, the threats have f****d off. I have complete faith in the men and women that are tasked with finding these threats and I'm thankful Cameron had the savvy to sort it on the quiet. Just as any other government with a shred of back bone would have. Certain military actions loose all effectiveness if the Commons have to give them the nod before hand. It went through parliament 2 years ago, and the man from del monte, he say f***ing no sunshine, chuck a load of muzz immigrants at us and it's KILL ALL THEM MUTHA FUKKERS Camerons a f***ing idiot, he couldn't sort you pie and peas out I think i'll have a round robin now i seem to be on a roll....................Assad being ousted, UK staying in the EU, and Corbyn winning the leadership........wonder what odds i'd get? Oh, so because parliament voted against bombing Assad on humanitarian grounds, that means we are to never engage legitimate threats to the UK in Syria? They're two completely separate things. These assassinations were an act of defence, the intervention discussed two years ago was never about defence.Absolutely nothing has changed, the Cabinet have the legal power to order military action without or even against parliamentary approval. In the case of defending the country from direct or immediate threats I completely approve. f**k waiting on parliament when opportunities arise to deal with threats. They're testing the water you numpty, was this c**t even killed when and how they're saying, we'll never know? kill the lot for me, i don't give a f**k, wish they'd start here though. Lets see how my round robin turns out? Did I say they weren't, you wazzock. Lol You can keep your round Robin, it's not really that insightful. The western powers want Assad out, nothing new there. He's on their list but proving problematic. The Russians might just cost you though, they've just raised the odds in this game of poker and I don't think anybody has the bollocks to match them. None of that changes the fact that the drone strike in question was NOT against the will of parliaments vote 2 years ago, was legal under our constitution and if anything was in support of the Assad regime. Not that Cameron would have liked that last bit. You and me both wish they'd start here! I said when this all kicked off, I'd be quite happy to see half the doors in Birmingham being kicked in and these fuckers executed in their beds. But realistically that wasn't going to happen.... when they started going to Syria though they became far more legitimate targets. I saw it as a good thing, as long as someone had the bollocks to take advantage of it. It wasn't meant to be insightful, i was stating the obvious, or what they would like to happen. Our laws aren't lawful in other countries are they? Its self condoning, that means very little from a legal stance, it just means we'll defend it on the world stage, and to our bleeding heart traitors, with the blood of ordinary people if needs be. If someone is a threat to us they should be taken out no matter where they're hiding, i'm all for it, but when it edges them closer to their goals i trust nothing they say. Not to mention them cosying up to the backers.........its all BS. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
waltjnr 5,972 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 If ISIS are a minuscule representation of muslims ,as just quoted on the BBC,(so it must be true) Why dont the the rest of them ,i.e the majority ,sort them out?Why so far have i seen a few white english people on tv that are willing/have opened their houses to refugees ,yet not seeing the vast muslim population clubbing together providing aid ,support ?just seen some christian church getting together clothes,shoes ect to send out to them ,not seen any mosques ! Oh well ,i guess even the vast majority of mussies arent that kind ,and caring either? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mad4it 693 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 in my eyes if you are born and rised in england, you should abay our laws whenyou go of and fight with any one agaist this country you are a trightors and should be treated as so, they should be shot on sight when they try coming back in to england, fair play on our lads and lasses in any of our armed services. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted September 8, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 There's talk in Westminster that a group of sanctimonious, bleeding-heart liberals will demand a judicial review, or challenge the legality of fighting back against our enemies....... ........(hangs head in despair !) 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.