Buster321c 1,010 Posted August 27, 2012 Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 No im hopefully highlighting the need to make a standard test for ALL airgunners and make OUR lives easier . Whats the problem ? ok , here you go , IN CASE ANYONE MISSED HIS POST - what started as a bit of banter,over a couple of pots of tea! seems to me that each county has its own decision whether to allow it,i thought the law was the law and it was the same for the UK i am confused!!! if the law made sense, solicitors could`nt charge so much, think in a way plod likes it beeing so confusing, lets a few of them make up their own rules as they like, cases where guns have been downgraded by some areas will be no use to Phantom, what he needs is case law, and i think it all goes the wrong way, anyone heard any more about possible appeals regarding the fss stitch ups recently, everything has gone deathly silent on them Thats the second time you`ve tried to make my posts look negative on here . Cant see the point meself , i thought we were all on the same side ........................ Quote Link to post
Buster321c 1,010 Posted August 27, 2012 Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 (edited) Ok it seems that Neil has taken offence to my play on his words . For the sake of the forum , all i wanted to do was highlight the fact that the law is `vague` on our part . When i edited his post , all i intended to do was highlight the fact that - IF THE LAW MADE SENSE - We would have a standard . We would all be able to set our power with a certain pellet . We could say with an amount of certainty that our guns were within the limit , because they were set using `guidelines ` that enable us be certain we would not break the law and put ourselves and our sport at risk . This was all i intended . But instead , it seems that its taken the wrong way , and turned into something its not . Like i say , i thought we were all on the same side ? If you wanna tell me to Sod off , do it here , not by PM . As for editing your posts ? Well its not rocket science , anyone can manage it if they try. serious answer to davy`s post, not the usual bull p**s taking threads that some of you lot put on here, if the thread is a joke subject then p**s take away and i`ll remember to do the same to you, otherwise, leave my posts alone, i don`t know you and you don`t know me so lets leave it at that Jesus Neil , you need to chill out . And like i said its not the first time you`ve come on with negative posts , so people in glass houses eh ? Edited August 27, 2012 by Buster321c Quote Link to post
neil82 1,088 Posted August 27, 2012 Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 where was the negative side of what i posted, apart from not liking your interference in my post, i tried keeping it to pm`s to keep it private between you and me, but if you want to make it public then ok, yes, i`m pi**ed off over it Quote Link to post
Buster321c 1,010 Posted August 27, 2012 Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 Well most of the PM`s if im honest ......... And hey , what about whats highlighted in red . Quote Link to post
GruffaloGriff 1,859 Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 Interesting debate here on the ins & outs of 12ftlb + rifles if you have not already read it, nearly 2000 views so you all probabally have! http://www.thehuntinglife.com/forums/topic/237976-legal-to-own-cpc-that-has-potential-over-12psi/ Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.