Walter Smith

[SLiP tHe DoG ! 129]

Walter is the Scottish version of the"Special One". And it's the club these players sign for not because who the manager is. The only reason your league is good is because of the money. Isn't your league basically a two horse race every season?

 

 

if you know nowt about football ya shouldnt really say anything tbh

and its the club these players sign for ha ha what a plonker of course it isnt ... so yaya toure would of signed for man city if mancini and his brother wasnt there ? arsenal went in for him a while back rumours were he didnt sign because he thought wenger 'lacked ambition' he wanted to play along side his brother aswell for years which is his dream and still didnt sign because of the manager

walter smith is a good manager but because hes done well over your place doesnt mean he can come to the best league in the world and be a so called legend it wouldnt happen

Edited May 20, 2011 by SLiP tHe DoG !

[undisputed 1,664]

Walter is the Scottish version of the"Special One". And it's the club these players sign for not because who the manager is. The only reason your league is good is because of the money. Isn't your league basically a two horse race every season?

 

 

if you know nowt about football ya shouldnt really say anything tbh

and its the club these players sign for ha ha what a plonker of course it isnt ... so yaya toure would of signed for man city if mancini and his brother wasnt there ? arsenal went in for him a while back rumours were he didnt sign because he thought wenger 'lacked ambition' he wanted to play along side his brother aswell for years which is his dream and still didnt sign because of the manager

walter smith is a good manager but because hes done well over your place doesnt mean he can come to the best league in the world and be a so called legend it wouldnt happen

 

Your talking out your arse u think if Mancini was the manager of Blackpool or Birmingham he'd off went there. They're all mercinarys they go with the money. Who apart from man u or poss chelsea could win that league?

[undisputed 1,664]

My local team would be East Fife and i wish them every success but i'm Celtic through and through, coming from a large Catholic family i was born into it and i dont see what the f*****g difference is me living an hour away or on the doorstep....

 

Is there such a thing as a small Catholic family considering the c**ts breed like rats?

 

That's funny coming from a web footed mutant who was the by product of a brother sister relationship.

[SLiP tHe DoG ! 129]

Walter is the Scottish version of the"Special One". And it's the club these players sign for not because who the manager is. The only reason your league is good is because of the money. Isn't your league basically a two horse race every season?

 

 

if you know nowt about football ya shouldnt really say anything tbh

and its the club these players sign for ha ha what a plonker of course it isnt ... so yaya toure would of signed for man city if mancini and his brother wasnt there ? arsenal went in for him a while back rumours were he didnt sign because he thought wenger 'lacked ambition' he wanted to play along side his brother aswell for years which is his dream and still didnt sign because of the manager

walter smith is a good manager but because hes done well over your place doesnt mean he can come to the best league in the world and be a so called legend it wouldnt happen

 

Your talking out your arse u think if Mancini was the manager of Blackpool or Birmingham he'd off went there. They're all mercinarys they go with the money. Who apart from man u or poss chelsea could win that league?

 

 

liverpool man city arsenal will al be in with a shot next season i actually fancy liverpool to pull it off , its about time you admit your leagues shite walter smith is a legend over there but wont be over here cos he aint good enough and your two best teams are CRAP

[gnasher16 30,709]

I havent looked on this thread as Walter Smiths a manager i dont know too much about but having clicked on the last page i see yous are onto the old leagues bashing debate again

Why on earth a Scot would have the cheek to knock the English premier league is beyond me .....i dont see any reason to think Walter Smith couldnt have done well down here,infact just as well as any of the other Scots who have been succesful.....but to think he would have automatically done great just because of his success up there is ridiculous......and that can be said about everything,theres no reason to think the big 2 clubs up there would do well down here,theres no reason to think the top players up there would do well down here.....its like anything,the proving ground is at the top not the bottom and the reality is the English is one of the worlds top leagues and the Scottish is one of the worlds lowest......it dont take a lot of brains to see they are silly comparisons to make.

Edited May 21, 2011 by gnasher16

[lanesra 4,007]

Walter is the Scottish version of the"Special One". And it's the club these players sign for not because who the manager is. The only reason your league is good is because of the money. Isn't your league basically a two horse race every season?

 

 

if you know nowt about football ya shouldnt really say anything tbh

and its the club these players sign for ha ha what a plonker of course it isnt ... so yaya toure would of signed for man city if mancini and his brother wasnt there ? arsenal went in for him a while back rumours were he didnt sign because he thought wenger 'lacked ambition' he wanted to play along side his brother aswell for years which is his dream and still didnt sign because of the manager

walter smith is a good manager but because hes done well over your place doesnt mean he can come to the best league in the world and be a so called legend it wouldnt happen

You think players sign because off who is manager or who plays for the club players are swayed to a club for 1 thing only MONEY , and nothing else matters , Shearer had the choice Man.u. or Blackburn , he chose the extra 10 grand a week , look at Tevez , how much has he Generated in commision over the last few yrs in transfer fees , and he is makin noises again he MIGHT want to leave , he knows he will either get a big transfer which = a big signin on fee or city will REWARD him a new contract , Rooney treated Man.u. disgracefully in october and what happened ...HE GOT A PAY RISE :11: ,

[baw 4,360]

I havent looked on this thread as Walter Smiths a manager i dont know too much about but having clicked on the last page i see yous are onto the old leagues bashing debate again

Why on earth a Scot would have the cheek to knock the English premier league is beyond me .....i dont see any reason to think Walter Smith couldnt have done well down here,infact just as well as any of the other Scots who have been succesful.....but to think he would have automatically done great just because of his success up there is ridiculous......and that can be said about everything,theres no reason to think the big 2 clubs up there would do well down here,theres no reason to think the top players up there would do well down here.....its like anything,the proving ground is at the top not the bottom and the reality is the English is one of the worlds top leagues and the Scottish is one of the worlds lowest......it dont take a lot of brains to see they are silly comparisons to make.

 

I can only compare what I've seen on the field regarding my own club against the english clubs. Apart from arsenal who had to cheat, we've held our own against the likes of man u, Blackburn, Liverpool who we have faced recently. We can't help it that not every club is run as good as Celtic and therefore the league is poorer for it. But we can still comment on the English league and how poor we feel it is. Your teams in the championship, doesn't stop you talking about the prem.

[baw 4,360]

Slip the dog, when was the last time arsenal won anything? And you think they can win the league next year that's priceless

[baw 4,360]

Pick it out.......,

[Lab 10,979]

Pick it out.......,

If i remember correctly didn't Mr Donowrong Giggs dive at Old Trafford to make it 3-2........

[gnasher16 30,709]

 

I can only compare what I've seen on the field regarding my own club against the english clubs. Apart from arsenal who had to cheat, we've held our own against the likes of man u, Blackburn, Liverpool who we have faced recently. We can't help it that not every club is run as good as Celtic and therefore the league is poorer for it. But we can still comment on the English league and how poor we feel it is. Your teams in the championship, doesn't stop you talking about the prem.

 

 

It always cracks me up when you hear a mans bias and loyalty come into a debate ....loyalty to your club is to be admired but not when it clouds your judgement.....im as loyal to my club as the next man but it dont stop me being realistic and admitting who and what we are.We beat Man Utd 4 nil this season did it stop us going down ? no....does it mean we are as good a side as Man Utd ? no.....we can all use certain results and situations to make claims but on the bigger picture simple common sense dicates and if you think Celtic or Rangers can compete with Man Utd,Chelsea,Liverpool,Arsenal on a week to week basis with the squads of players you have you are totally deluded.

Come on do you honestly think that Reyes or whoever it was HAD to cheat to win ? like there was no other possible way Arsenal could win unless they cheated ?.....do you really think that because you did ok on a certain day against Man Utd,Blackburn and Liverpool that means you can hold your own on any given day.....a football season is 38 games in the premier league.... comment on whatever you like mate but at least be realistic and dont let your loyalty distort your views.

Edited May 21, 2011 by gnasher16

[baw 4,360]

Yeah lab, all the best leagues do it

[f mac 40]

 

I can only compare what I've seen on the field regarding my own club against the english clubs. Apart from arsenal who had to cheat, we've held our own against the likes of man u, Blackburn, Liverpool who we have faced recently. We can't help it that not every club is run as good as Celtic and therefore the league is poorer for it. But we can still comment on the English league and how poor we feel it is. Your teams in the championship, doesn't stop you talking about the prem.

 

 

It always cracks me up when you hear a mans bias and loyalty come into a debate ....loyalty to your club is to be admired but not when it clouds your judgement.....im as loyal to my club as the next man but it dont stop me being realistic and admitting who and what we are.We beat Man Utd 4 nil this season did it stop us going down ? no....does it mean we are as good a side as Man Utd ? no.....we can all use certain results and situations to make claims but on the bigger picture simple common sense dicates and if you think Celtic or Rangers can compete with Man Utd,Chelsea,Liverpool,Arsenal on a week to week basis with the squads of players you have you are totally deluded.

Come on do you honestly think that Reyes or whoever it was HAD to cheat to win ? like there was no other possible way Arsenal could win unless they cheated ?.....do you really think that because you did ok on a certain day against Man Utd,Blackburn and Liverpool that means you can hold your own on any given day.....a football season is 38 games in the premier league.... comment on whatever you like mate but at least be realistic and dont let your loyalty distort your views.

the guys got a point baw the league is decided over x amount of games not a 1 off cup tie

[Lab 10,979]

 

I can only compare what I've seen on the field regarding my own club against the english clubs. Apart from arsenal who had to cheat, we've held our own against the likes of man u, Blackburn, Liverpool who we have faced recently. We can't help it that not every club is run as good as Celtic and therefore the league is poorer for it. But we can still comment on the English league and how poor we feel it is. Your teams in the championship, doesn't stop you talking about the prem.

 

 

It always cracks me up when you hear a mans bias and loyalty come into a debate ....loyalty to your club is to be admired but not when it clouds your judgement.....im as loyal to my club as the next man but it dont stop me being realistic and admitting who and what we are.We beat Man Utd 4 nil this season did it stop us going down ? no....does it mean we are as good a side as Man Utd ? no.....we can all use certain results and situations to make claims but on the bigger picture simple common sense dicates and if you think Celtic or Rangers can compete with Man Utd,Chelsea,Liverpool,Arsenal on a week to week basis with the squads of players you have you are totally deluded.

Come on do you honestly think that Reyes or whoever it was HAD to cheat to win ? like there was no other possible way Arsenal could win unless they cheated ?.....do you really think that because you did ok on a certain day against Man Utd,Blackburn and Liverpool that means you can hold your own on any given day.....a football season is 38 games in the premier league.... comment on whatever you like mate but at least be realistic and dont let your loyalty distort your views.

the guys got a point baw the league is decided over x amount of games not a 1 off cup tie

FFS i knew the SFA were in on it but not the President of the USA.........know wonder we get robbed....

[baw 4,360]

I cam only speak about facts Gnasher, no sentiment here. As I stated we more than hold our own against English teams. Whether arsenal would have beaten us without cheating is neither here or there, the FACT is they cheated to get a result. Ofcourse my team couldn't compete in the prem, youbuild a team for the league your in with the resources you have. Your team will cut it's cloth to suit the championship. Doesn't mean if you get promoted you won't strengthen again just like we would. But regarding a one on one game tomorrow between us and your top club in enfland especially at paradise, I'd put money on us winning. Does that make your clubs better than mine? We beat rangers 3 times drew 2 lost 2 but we lost the league. Did Lennon beat Walter smith? In my eyes yes, but the league is made up of more teams than rangers.