Guest little lurcher Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 oh dear oh dear leaving numbers for all to see , damn i do hope no one bombards them!!! http://www.huntwatch.info/help.htm Quote Link to post
borntoshoot 1 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 look at the hunting convictions section. i quote from one "incident" John Greenwood and Daniel Graves, both of Nelson in Lancashire were found guilty of hunting rabbits with luchers. Greenwood was fined £100 with £95 costs and Graves was fined £50 with £95 costs. And also at the bottom of the page I also quote A gang of seven men: Daniel Dooley, Darren Fairclough, Michael Smith, John Weeder and Paul Hoffman from Liverpool, Adam McIlvenna from Halewood and Kevin Walton from Knowsley were found guilty of hunting rats with dogs. Each was fined £400 and ordered to pay £65 court costs. just goes to show that the moderators/creators of this site no feck all about the hunting act. this must be made up because nobody would be arrested for hunting rats with dogs as they are not anything to do with the hunting act. Quote Link to post
BEARINATOR 2,924 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Thanks for that Little Lurcher, I think a few calls are in order:whistling: Quote Link to post
Wxm 1,638 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 look at the hunting convictions section. i quote from one "incident" John Greenwood and Daniel Graves, both of Nelson in Lancashire were found guilty of hunting rabbits with luchers. Greenwood was fined £100 with £95 costs and Graves was fined £50 with £95 costs. And also at the bottom of the page I also quote A gang of seven men: Daniel Dooley, Darren Fairclough, Michael Smith, John Weeder and Paul Hoffman from Liverpool, Adam McIlvenna from Halewood and Kevin Walton from Knowsley were found guilty of hunting rats with dogs. Each was fined £400 and ordered to pay £65 court costs. just goes to show that the moderators/creators of this site no feck all about the hunting act. this must be made up because nobody would be arrested for hunting rats with dogs as they are not anything to do with the hunting act. i was just coming on here to say the same what a hock of sh1t. they aint got a fcukin clue Quote Link to post
gnipper 6,891 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 look at the hunting convictions section. i quote from one "incident" John Greenwood and Daniel Graves, both of Nelson in Lancashire were found guilty of hunting rabbits with luchers. Greenwood was fined £100 with £95 costs and Graves was fined £50 with £95 costs. And also at the bottom of the page I also quote A gang of seven men: Daniel Dooley, Darren Fairclough, Michael Smith, John Weeder and Paul Hoffman from Liverpool, Adam McIlvenna from Halewood and Kevin Walton from Knowsley were found guilty of hunting rats with dogs. Each was fined £400 and ordered to pay £65 court costs. just goes to show that the moderators/creators of this site no feck all about the hunting act. this must be made up because nobody would be arrested for hunting rats with dogs as they are not anything to do with the hunting act. If you haven't got permission to be on the land then rats are untouchable, its a joke. There's been a few lads done for ratting. Its only rats and rabbits you can touch basically and thats only if you have permission. Nothings illegal until your caught though Quote Link to post
Guest little lurcher Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Thanks for that Little Lurcher, I think a few calls are in order:whistling: glad to be a help lol , a little education is in order Quote Link to post
mushroom 14,215 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 check out their links anti bloodsports sites hunt saboteur groups who wants to join Quote Link to post
willum 89 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 hhhhhhm norwich postcode Quote Link to post
littletimmy 71 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 look at the hunting convictions section. i quote from one "incident" John Greenwood and Daniel Graves, both of Nelson in Lancashire were found guilty of hunting rabbits with luchers. Greenwood was fined £100 with £95 costs and Graves was fined £50 with £95 costs. And also at the bottom of the page I also quote A gang of seven men: Daniel Dooley, Darren Fairclough, Michael Smith, John Weeder and Paul Hoffman from Liverpool, Adam McIlvenna from Halewood and Kevin Walton from Knowsley were found guilty of hunting rats with dogs. Each was fined £400 and ordered to pay £65 court costs. just goes to show that the moderators/creators of this site no feck all about the hunting act. this must be made up because nobody would be arrested for hunting rats with dogs as they are not anything to do with the hunting act. The rats one is true mate, happened about a year or 2 ago. http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2007/10/15/gang-fined-for-setting-dogs-on-rats-100252-19951690/ Keepers and farmer round there dont bother telling you to f**k off, straight on to plod on the sly, wankers. Quote Link to post
terrierist 1 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Never seen that site before although I once found an Anti site against terrier work it was called 'DIGGING OUT' there were some pretty good videos on there actually and alot of rubbish written about terrier work too! I will def be giving that site a call at 2am!! How nice of them to leave a number for us!!! Happy Hunting! Quote Link to post
ArchieHood 3,692 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Gonna stick some of these around my local haunts Quote Link to post
mushroom 14,215 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 07951 100303 I think this might not be the number for North West LACS massage parlour Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.