Marmite

Lol,yes megapixel size was what I tried to say .. tried!Over iso 400 and the gap opens,that is interesting.I take it that you mean perfect light also? Very interesting. The d300 is a really good camera, and a lot of pros using d3 used it as their second camera, some used it as their first.... Had I not squashed mine I would probably still have it now, as my second camera.. I have friends with d7000 and d7100 and these seem to manage low light well, and are sensiblypriced..might also be worth a look at, as the d700 is now obsolete I suppose the replacement for a D700 user would be a D750

Question for you with experience of using both models. Being that they share the same sensor and with equal good light/conditions and matching focal lengths was there difference in picture quality?,in reality there should'nt be in ideal light should there?

Total accident, forgot it was next to the back wheel, still attached to my d300 both knacked....:-(Claimed on my house insurance no problems :-) I take it you did'nt replace the D300?

Peanuts!

Shame really but they are 'The waste of time Games' in the modern world as far as pro' sportsmen are concerned.

Nigger,Sambo,Golly always interesting calling them back in a public park!.I'm assuming of course your dog will be of a darker hue lol

Very nice What glass did you use?

Interesting.And what is your rationale for that statement?

Seen very good ones, very bad ones, and everything in between Sound's about right for all lines if the truth was told

What body are you using these days with the King Dongs of glass?

Nothing new there,who remembers Bill Harrigan lol

That would be mainly the BBC then.And as we find out every week the BBC is still the same to this day full of strays and gays and labour cronies or ex. MP's

Out of interest what are their sizes DD?

Stock breaking

I thought you'd had a dream and saw it 2 years in the future