none of that has any relevance in this case, the officer that shot him believed him to have a gun and believed him to be an imminent danger to himself and or the public, that has been proved in court, it has also been proved he was in fact unarmed at the time he was shot, some strange cover up that why are the families lawyers not contesting the fact he had a gun only the fact he was not carrying it at the time he was shot
no it does THEY BELIEVIED HIM TO BE A THREAT as well they killed him