dogmad riley 1,336 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 Opinions please guys what does one offer that the other doesnt? I like both crosses as both are they handy Quote Link to post
the trunk 2,859 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 I wouldnt touch anything with saluki in it everyone i have seen wasnt up to much but not saying all are i just havent seen them Quote Link to post
paulsmithy83 567 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 Both are well tried crosses and both work very well but its all about if each one throws the right ingredients. I am a saluki/bull/grey man through and through. If your lucky enough to get the grit of the bull with the staying power of the saluki that one lethal dog on ALL edible and teeth. Well thats what you hope for shame it doesnt always work like that Quote Link to post
Chid 6,376 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 C/b/g x s/g lol 1 Quote Link to post
paulsmithy83 567 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 Chid funny enough i was just about to edit my post and say that haha Quote Link to post
roybo 2,873 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 Potentially great or shite ,if the parents were good the pups have got every chance . They will be lurchers at the end of the day buddy and what you show them will have more influence than the pure breeds that went into them generations ago . But the breeds you mention are the backbone of a lot of lines so if the both parents do what you want .....go for it 1 Quote Link to post
bmull 189 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 why bull in beter without it Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.