Malt 379 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 But there is a replacement right? Do you think countries are thinking, quick, lets ambush Britian while they are weak lol. As for our allies, friends and foe will be decided on how much trade you can do. No pointing in investing in bombs to lie in a shed while countries around invest in their economy while ours goes down the swanny. The pen is mightier than the sword, ask India. Ask India, the country that's investing hugely in defence to counter a growing China and at a nuclear stalemate with their Pakistani neighbours? LOL Aye born, at the expensive of their economy they have done that they are even in the space race ffs something we could never afford. We had a space program, we just gave it up and started working with others.. Also the MIRV system on our nuclear weapons is British made and built, even though the missiles that get them into space are American.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Which battles we choose to fight is something of a different discussion I suppose. Even if we chose to stay out of 99% I still feel we need a military at least as capable as we have today.... Well I agree but the way I see it having those pointless wars is partly responsible for wasting the budget which is why we are having to cut back. The Russians and Chinese must have been rubbing their hands when we went in to Afghanistan and Iraq Exactly mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,907 Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 But there is a replacement right? Do you think countries are thinking, quick, lets ambush Britian while they are weak lol. As for our allies, friends and foe will be decided on how much trade you can do. No pointing in investing in bombs to lie in a shed while countries around invest in their economy while ours goes down the swanny. The pen is mightier than the sword, ask India. Ask India, the country that's investing hugely in defence to counter a growing China and at a nuclear stalemate with their Pakistani neighbours? LOL Aye born, at the expensive of their economy they have done that they are even in the space race ffs something we could never afford. Well of course bullets cost money. But they have both China and Pakistan to compete with. Investing in space tech usually proves beneficial to a countries economy. NASA has had a hugely possitive effect on the US economy. It's also something the UK leads the world in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 But there is a replacement right? Do you think countries are thinking, quick, lets ambush Britian while they are weak lol. As for our allies, friends and foe will be decided on how much trade you can do. No pointing in investing in bombs to lie in a shed while countries around invest in their economy while ours goes down the swanny. The pen is mightier than the sword, ask India. Ask India, the country that's investing hugely in defence to counter a growing China and at a nuclear stalemate with their Pakistani neighbours? LOL Aye born, at the expensive of their economy they have done that they are even in the space race ffs something we could never afford.We had a space program, we just gave it up and started working with others.. Also the MIRV system on our nuclear weapons is British made and built, even though the missiles that get them into space are American.. I'm sure your right malt but the point is, India aren't skint like us. It's ok throwing money at defense when you can afford it but I don't care how many bombs we have, if we don't invest in the economy, we are f****d. If that means defense cut backs, so be it. No point in having a gun and you can't afford ammo. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 So many experts world leaders only need to look on here and the worlds problems would be solvedAye I guess we shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion or be allowed to discuss serious matters, let those in power get on with it eh? I'll lock the thread in a bit, tits and arse threads from now on please chaps.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,907 Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 (edited) I'm sure your right malt but the point is, India aren't skint like us. It's ok throwing money at defense when you can afford it but I don't care how many bombs we have, if we don't invest in the economy, we are f****d. If that means defense cut backs, so be it. No point in having a gun and you can't afford ammo. I think the standard of living here is significanlty better than that in India. That's why they're not skint. There's a lot of things we need to change here to sort the economy out mate. Edited February 5, 2014 by Born Hunter 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 But there is a replacement right? Do you think countries are thinking, quick, lets ambush Britian while they are weak lol. As for our allies, friends and foe will be decided on how much trade you can do. No pointing in investing in bombs to lie in a shed while countries around invest in their economy while ours goes down the swanny. The pen is mightier than the sword, ask India. Ask India, the country that's investing hugely in defence to counter a growing China and at a nuclear stalemate with their Pakistani neighbours? LOL Aye born, at the expensive of their economy they have done that they are even in the space race ffs something we could never afford.We had a space program, we just gave it up and started working with others.. Also the MIRV system on our nuclear weapons is British made and built, even though the missiles that get them into space are American.. I'm sure your right malt but the point is, India aren't skint like us. It's ok throwing money at defense when you can afford it but I don't care how many bombs we have, if we don't invest in the economy, we are f****d. If that means defense cut backs, so be it. No point in having a gun and you can't afford ammo. Have you seen how most of the population of India live mate? If they all had even a quarter of the quality of life as we do they wouldn't be able to afford a f***ing space program either.. It's shocking.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 I'm sure your right malt but the point is, India aren't skint like us. It's ok throwing money at defense when you can afford it but I don't care how many bombs we have, if we don't invest in the economy, we are f****d. If that means defense cut backs, so be it. No point in having a gun and you can't afford ammo. I think the standard of living here is significanlty better than that in India. Aye for sure but that's more to do with corruption than wealth. Anyhow mate, I believe we should have a nuclear defense, a military defense but I'm not frightened of cutbacks. I'm sure the figure crunchers know what they are doing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 But there is a replacement right? Do you think countries are thinking, quick, lets ambush Britian while they are weak lol. As for our allies, friends and foe will be decided on how much trade you can do. No pointing in investing in bombs to lie in a shed while countries around invest in their economy while ours goes down the swanny. The pen is mightier than the sword, ask India. Ask India, the country that's investing hugely in defence to counter a growing China and at a nuclear stalemate with their Pakistani neighbours? LOL Aye born, at the expensive of their economy they have done that they are even in the space race ffs something we could never afford.We had a space program, we just gave it up and started working with others.. Also the MIRV system on our nuclear weapons is British made and built, even though the missiles that get them into space are American..I'm sure your right malt but the point is, India aren't skint like us. It's ok throwing money at defense when you can afford it but I don't care how many bombs we have, if we don't invest in the economy, we are f****d. If that means defense cut backs, so be it. No point in having a gun and you can't afford ammo.Have you seen how most of the population of India live mate? If they all had even a quarter of the quality of life as we do they wouldn't be able to afford a f*****g space program either.. It's shocking.. Why the f**k did I mention India can I change it to china please Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 I'm sure your right malt but the point is, India aren't skint like us. It's ok throwing money at defense when you can afford it but I don't care how many bombs we have, if we don't invest in the economy, we are f****d. If that means defense cut backs, so be it. No point in having a gun and you can't afford ammo. I think the standard of living here is significanlty better than that in India. Aye for sure but that's more to do with corruption than wealth. Anyhow mate, I believe we should have a nuclear defense, a military defense but I'm not frightened of cutbacks. I'm sure the figure crunchers know what they are doing. I'm not.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Why the f**k did I mention India can I change it to china please Wouldn't make much difference if you did mate.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 So many experts world leaders only need to look on here and the worlds problems would be solved Is that your only input? Bravo, bravo, encore encore Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,907 Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 I'm sure your right malt but the point is, India aren't skint like us. It's ok throwing money at defense when you can afford it but I don't care how many bombs we have, if we don't invest in the economy, we are f****d. If that means defense cut backs, so be it. No point in having a gun and you can't afford ammo. I think the standard of living here is significanlty better than that in India. Aye for sure but that's more to do with corruption than wealth. Anyhow mate, I believe we should have a nuclear defense, a military defense but I'm not frightened of cutbacks. I'm sure the figure crunchers know what they are doing. I just see that we are at a very critical point in our capability. And I don't see the world as the safe place a lot of others seem to do. There IS going to be a shift in power, we've known that for a few years. That shift will comes with a lot of conflict. I don't want to see the UK caught soft muscled and unfit. I'd personally sacrifice a lot before defence. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Why the f**k did I mention India can I change it to china please Wouldn't make much difference if you did mate.. I don't know why we are bothered anyway, once the zombies take over we are f****d any road Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 I'm sure your right malt but the point is, India aren't skint like us. It's ok throwing money at defense when you can afford it but I don't care how many bombs we have, if we don't invest in the economy, we are f****d. If that means defense cut backs, so be it. No point in having a gun and you can't afford ammo. I think the standard of living here is significanlty better than that in India. Aye for sure but that's more to do with corruption than wealth. Anyhow mate, I believe we should have a nuclear defense, a military defense but I'm not frightened of cutbacks. I'm sure the figure crunchers know what they are doing. I just see that we are at a very critical point in our capability. And I don't see the world as the safe place a lot of others seem to do. There IS going to be a shift in power, we've known that for a few years. That shift will comes with a lot of conflict. I don't want to see the UK caught soft muscled and unfit. I'd personally sacrifice a lot before defence. It's a balance mate, the wealthiest countries have the best defense. I see us going bankrupt more of a threat to our defense than if we strengthen it or not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.