Jump to content

Sensible Folk page..IanB


Recommended Posts

I mentioned it last week in the mod section, its not an easy thing to implement and manage, but it is getting looked into, :yes:

it's easy to manage im sure...a lot easier than manageing 30 odd thousand mamber's.. :yes: ..it would/should be a small part of the forum for chosen member's who know each other and can vouch for each other..it's only a idea at the end of the day.. but a lot of usefull info is passed via PM because folk dare not or will not stick it on the forum through crabber's..

Ill MOD it for ian you if you dare let me .. :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Is they not some way you can rig a page up that is locked and only sensible folk can veiw the page with the mean's of a password..that can only be given by mod's or 100% normal member's..i dont mean a

I have been reliably informed only those who are considered couth will be allowed into the inner sanctom. That definitely rules me out as the wife says I am the most uncouth person shes ever met, alt

I find that the ....opinionated , argumentitive , contentious people are sometimes the ones worth reading .

Posted Images

The problem that I have seen in the past is where for instance those that follow running dogs tend to come across on to the likes of DeerStalking and Management and piss all over it on mass. its at that point i give up posting theres no point as it to confrontational.

 

Usually it gets personal and I have in the past took the legal high ground which is not really my nature but some of the posts without going into detail in particular border being illegal under the present legislation.

Dont get me wrong I believe in live and let live but i would never go over on there section just to provoke.

 

Maybe it maybe a good idea only to be allowed into certain sections of the forum which would eliminate such confrontation as the original poster suggests

 

That's because there as biased as anti's Stuart, the ones that come on to provoke, you have to feel sorry for them... remember report the post and we will look into it and remove the member if they have a history of it...we need to come down hard, sadly I cannot believe how many idiots are involved in the fieldsports now...if we all work together, we can hopefully make a difference..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mentioned it last week in the mod section, its not an easy thing to implement and manage, but it is getting looked into, :yes:

it's easy to manage im sure...a lot easier than manageing 30 odd thousand mamber's.. :yes: ..it would/should be a small part of the forum for chosen member's who know each other and can vouch for each other..it's only a idea at the end of the day.. but a lot of usefull info is passed via PM because folk dare not or will not stick it on the forum through crabber's..

Ill MOD it for ian you if you dare let me .. :laugh:

 

I wasnt aware that IAN had access to crimean bronze from that cannon theymake Victoria Crosses out of Millet :tongue2:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem that I have seen in the past is where for instance those that follow running dogs tend to come across on to the likes of DeerStalking and Management and piss all over it on mass. its at that point i give up posting theres no point as it to confrontational.

 

Usually it gets personal and I have in the past took the legal high ground which is not really my nature but some of the posts without going into detail in particular border being illegal under the present legislation.

Dont get me wrong I believe in live and let live but i would never go over on there section just to provoke.

 

Maybe it maybe a good idea only to be allowed into certain sections of the forum which would eliminate such confrontation as the original poster suggests

 

That's because there as biased as anti's Stuart, the ones that come on to provoke, you have to feel sorry for them... remember report the post and we will look into it and remove the member if they have a history of it...we need to come down hard, sadly I cannot believe how many idiots are involved in the fieldsports now...if we all work together, we can hopefully make a difference..

 

Agreed :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mentioned it last week in the mod section, its not an easy thing to implement and manage, but it is getting looked into, :yes:

it's easy to manage im sure...a lot easier than manageing 30 odd thousand mamber's.. :yes: ..it would/should be a small part of the forum for chosen member's who know each other and can vouch for each other..it's only a idea at the end of the day.. but a lot of usefull info is passed via PM because folk dare not or will not stick it on the forum through crabber's..

Ill MOD it for ian you if you dare let me .. :laugh:

 

Its not that easy, take my word for it... it involves individually adjusting member groups to allow access from within the Admin side of things... It would also not be people vouching for each other, it would be based on members post content and how they communicate with others on the forum..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ideation you are a tree hugging jesus looking mother f****r and i bet you stink.. :D .a simple locked forum would be nice and if any unwanted folk managed to sneak in they could quickly be moved on back to the play ground.. :yes:

 

Guilty as charged mate, even johnnys 5 year old tells me to shave :laugh: but i only stink of ferrets and dead rabbits, so it could be worse i suppose :icon_redface:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mentioned it last week in the mod section, its not an easy thing to implement and manage, but it is getting looked into, :yes:

it's easy to manage im sure...a lot easier than manageing 30 odd thousand mamber's.. :yes: ..it would/should be a small part of the forum for chosen member's who know each other and can vouch for each other..it's only a idea at the end of the day.. but a lot of usefull info is passed via PM because folk dare not or will not stick it on the forum through crabber's..

Ill MOD it for ian you if you dare let me .. :laugh:

 

Its not that easy, take my word for it... it involves individually adjusting member groups to allow access from within the Admin side of things... It would also not be people vouching for each other, it would be based on members post content and how they communicate with others on the forum..

I dont have to take your word for it with running a forum myself i am well aware of what work there is behind the scenes and keeping it all running smooth with hastle, running one with the amount of members you have on here must be a logistic nightmare mate.

Edited by Caprelous
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not that easy, take my word for it... it involves individually adjusting member groups to allow access from within the Admin side of things... It would also not be people vouching for each other, it would be based on members post content and how they communicate with others on the forum..

Seen it done else where..that is where my theory come into it..it's not hard to grade genuine folk i am sure..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not that easy, take my word for it... it involves individually adjusting member groups to allow access from within the Admin side of things... It would also not be people vouching for each other, it would be based on members post content and how they communicate with others on the forum..

Seen it done else where..that is where my theory come into it..it's not hard to grade genuine folk i am sure..

 

How would you grade a genuine newcomer to the site then who wasnt a dickhead but a genuine guy but not in a position post wise to prove he was a genuine guy?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not that easy, take my word for it... it involves individually adjusting member groups to allow access from within the Admin side of things... It would also not be people vouching for each other, it would be based on members post content and how they communicate with others on the forum..

Seen it done else where..that is where my theory come into it..it's not hard to grade genuine folk i am sure..

 

How would you grade a genuine newcomer to the site then who wasnt a dickhead but a genuine guy but not in a position post wise to prove he was a genuine guy?

just have to put up with the dickeheads mean while like everyone else has? lol
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not that easy, take my word for it... it involves individually adjusting member groups to allow access from within the Admin side of things... It would also not be people vouching for each other, it would be based on members post content and how they communicate with others on the forum..

Seen it done else where..that is where my theory come into it..it's not hard to grade genuine folk i am sure..

 

How would you grade a genuine newcomer to the site then who wasnt a dickhead but a genuine guy but not in a position post wise to prove he was a genuine guy?

I would not judge him matey..he could do well and good on the forum but untill he proved his worth.. he would not be allowed to log in on a separate sub forum.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...