Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted August 17, 2011 Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 This isnt about bleeding hearts how many people lost their homes and livelyhoods through the crisis caused by the banks....how f*****g many mp's went to prison during the expences scandal? Its one law for them and another for the poor. The whole f*****g shower of them should have been rounded up... But instead we just tut tut and have to tighten our belts for something that had nothing to do with us and they carry on regardless. Undisputed, I think you've got it spot on here. The damage the bankers and politicians have done to this country in recent years has been a lot worse than what these characters have done by going on the rampage for a few days. IMO they've grabbed a hold of two dopey WHITE kids and made an example of them, to try and give the impression they're coming down hard on the hoodlums. I wonder how long they'll do of their 4 year sentence? I see Politicians getting away with suspended sentences and getting away with doing a few months and even weeks in some cases. I seen on the news one Politician was saved from being given a custodial sentence because he was suffering from depression! lol Unbelievable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted August 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 i agree with you guys the politicians and crooked cops should face justice aswell,but no way that should interfere with dealing with this lot who took it upon themselfs to loot and destroy british cities. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
undisputed 1,664 Posted August 17, 2011 Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 (edited) i agree with you guys the politicians and crooked cops should face justice aswell,but no way that should interfere with dealing with this lot who took it upon themselfs to loot and destroy british cities. Not saying for one minute they shouldn't.be punished but you can't have one law for them and another for us. Compare it if you like to the riots in Manchester a couple of yrs ago after the uefa final the sentences handed out were tame by comparison Edited August 17, 2011 by undisputed Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted August 17, 2011 Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 i agree with you guys the politicians and crooked cops should face justice aswell,but no way that should interfere with dealing with this lot who took it upon themselfs to loot and destroy british cities. absolutely agree,a criminal is a criminal. it just gets f****d up when judges start pushing a political agenda,regardless of the riots every individual crime should be punished as such,on its own merit. mugging someone or burning their house down are very serious offences and deserve appropriate punishment,but jokingly saying on facebook lets all meet behind maccys and have a riot isnt. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted August 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 i agree with you guys the politicians and crooked cops should face justice aswell,but no way that should interfere with dealing with this lot who took it upon themselfs to loot and destroy british cities. absolutely agree,a criminal is a criminal. it just gets f****d up when judges start pushing a political agenda,regardless of the riots every individual crime should be punished as such,on its own merit. mugging someone or burning their house down are very serious offences and deserve appropriate punishment,but jokingly saying on facebook lets all meet behind maccys and have a riot isnt. do you know these lads?if i had done the same thing they did and plod came a chapping.of course im gonna say it was a joke.well the jokes on them c**ts now Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted August 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 i agree with you guys the politicians and crooked cops should face justice aswell,but no way that should interfere with dealing with this lot who took it upon themselfs to loot and destroy british cities. Not saying for one minute they shouldn't.be punished but you can't have one law for them and another for us. Compare it if you like to the riots in Manchester a couple of yrs ago after the uefa final the sentences handed out were tame by comparison diffrent thing altogether.we in the uk have lived with football riots for many a year now.and sentences that were considered a bit harsh were handed down.this wasnt a riot over the footy or through a drink filled crowd,this was thieving and looting on an epic scale.result millions of damage,5 folk dead.countless people burned out thier homes lost businesses and just basic anarchy for a short period.oh and the one law for them and another law for us,has been going on for years.its not right by any means,but there it is.politicians fiddlying thier expenses,shocking,but we have all done it,maybe not on the scale those c**ts did. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lab 10,979 Posted August 18, 2011 Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 I cant believe the MPs swindling money is getting compared to this. They took a chance were they could make a few bucks and it back fired, they should be punished by repayment or prison sentence. If anyone out there has helped themelves to something from work, 'perks of the job' then you cant really complain. Granted alot of them took it to an extreme but al bet your working class Joe Bloggs has made a few bucks as well this way. I know i have!!! If the sentences dont fit the crimes then the country is well and truly f****d, it will happen again and again and again with these little b*****ds running amok knowing fine well they can loot, make a packet selling it on the black market and the punishment will be a slap on the wrist. You've got to laugh when some folk expect 'sweeping up the street' should be there punishment......how f*****g disgusting!!! There are people out there week in week out working for councils that do that job just to make ends meet and folk want that to be a punishment........ Well never mind if the punishments are pish and you haven't got a job i'd get yourself down to the next riot and grab as much clobber you can, sell it, make a fortune, sweep the street for a week and then wait for the next riot............. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Irish Lurcher 1,013 Posted August 18, 2011 Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 I think that the judicial got it wrong this time round, yes by all means execute them b*****ds that brought havoc and mayhem to the streets, but ffs two lads sitting at home trying to be hard on the FB site, this type of sentencing makes a mockery of the whole system. The system would be best served were they to channel their resources into the finding and bringing to justice the filth that caused such mayhem instead of wasting time on two young pups taking the piss from their bedrooms. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,974 Posted August 18, 2011 Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 All very well us sitting here saying they were just messing around and had no intention of a riot but the court made the decision and I'll back that as I dont know the facts like they do. I for one wanted to see heavy sentences being handed out and now we are getting them. To the two lads that have got 4 years, I say tough shit, your a prime example of our modern disrespectfull and dishonourable society. Perhaps 4 years is a bit heavy but I would rather see them do 4 years than 4 days of community service! Honest to god, I would have shot alot of the scallys crawling the streets last week! They're a f*****g disgrace to humanity. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted August 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 I think that the judicial got it wrong this time round, yes by all means execute them b*****ds that brought havoc and mayhem to the streets, but ffs two lads sitting at home trying to be hard on the FB site, this type of sentencing makes a mockery of the whole system. The system would be best served were they to channel their resources into the finding and bringing to justice the filth that caused such mayhem instead of wasting time on two young pups taking the piss from their bedrooms. oh do you know these to lads aswell? all very well people speculating on these two face book c**ts,do you know thier previous convictions or what type of lads they are.yea like i said if i was them and in thier position,all day long im gonna say it was a joke to the law.flip side to that coin being,what if they did manage to create a riot.do you think they would sit in thier bedroom and think "oh no we were only joking".like f**k they would,they would have been thier helping themselfs to whatever they could get thier grubby little hands on.possibly even setting fire to a shop and killing someone.im just speculating here btw,same as you lot who are thinking.oh waht a shame,thats a bit harsh on the two lads who were only having a joke and acting hard.would you still find it funny if they had wrecked your business or burned you out of your home.seriously i cant believe in a short space of time,there some folk saying this is a bit harsh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted August 18, 2011 Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 I think that the judicial got it wrong this time round, yes by all means execute them b*****ds that brought havoc and mayhem to the streets, but ffs two lads sitting at home trying to be hard on the FB site, this type of sentencing makes a mockery of the whole system. The system would be best served were they to channel their resources into the finding and bringing to justice the filth that caused such mayhem instead of wasting time on two young pups taking the piss from their bedrooms. oh do you know these to lads aswell? all very well people speculating on these two face book c**ts,do you know thier previous convictions or what type of lads they are.yea like i said if i was them and in thier position,all day long im gonna say it was a joke to the law.flip side to that coin being,what if they did manage to create a riot.do you think they would sit in thier bedroom and think "oh no we were only joking".like f**k they would,they would have been thier helping themselfs to whatever they could get thier grubby little hands on.possibly even setting fire to a shop and killing someone.im just speculating here btw,same as you lot who are thinking.oh waht a shame,thats a bit harsh on the two lads who were only having a joke and acting hard.would you still find it funny if they had wrecked your business or burned you out of your home.seriously i cant believe in a short space of time,there some folk saying this is a bit harsh. maybe your sig indicates your likely to become an extremist and commit some act of terror. maybe every sighthound owner is going to hunt hares. maybe everyone who owns a gun for sporting purposes is going to go on a killing spree. maybes and might do's aren't crimes. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,974 Posted August 18, 2011 Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 I think that the judicial got it wrong this time round, yes by all means execute them b*****ds that brought havoc and mayhem to the streets, but ffs two lads sitting at home trying to be hard on the FB site, this type of sentencing makes a mockery of the whole system. The system would be best served were they to channel their resources into the finding and bringing to justice the filth that caused such mayhem instead of wasting time on two young pups taking the piss from their bedrooms. oh do you know these to lads aswell? all very well people speculating on these two face book c**ts,do you know thier previous convictions or what type of lads they are.yea like i said if i was them and in thier position,all day long im gonna say it was a joke to the law.flip side to that coin being,what if they did manage to create a riot.do you think they would sit in thier bedroom and think "oh no we were only joking".like f**k they would,they would have been thier helping themselfs to whatever they could get thier grubby little hands on.possibly even setting fire to a shop and killing someone.im just speculating here btw,same as you lot who are thinking.oh waht a shame,thats a bit harsh on the two lads who were only having a joke and acting hard.would you still find it funny if they had wrecked your business or burned you out of your home.seriously i cant believe in a short space of time,there some folk saying this is a bit harsh. maybe your sig indicates your likely to become an extremist and commit some act of terror. maybe every sighthound owner is going to hunt hares. maybe everyone who owns a gun for sporting purposes is going to go on a killing spree. maybes and might do's aren't crimes. I agree, likewise "I was just having a laugh" isnt an excuse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted August 18, 2011 Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 I think that the judicial got it wrong this time round, yes by all means execute them b*****ds that brought havoc and mayhem to the streets, but ffs two lads sitting at home trying to be hard on the FB site, this type of sentencing makes a mockery of the whole system. The system would be best served were they to channel their resources into the finding and bringing to justice the filth that caused such mayhem instead of wasting time on two young pups taking the piss from their bedrooms. oh do you know these to lads aswell? all very well people speculating on these two face book c**ts,do you know thier previous convictions or what type of lads they are.yea like i said if i was them and in thier position,all day long im gonna say it was a joke to the law.flip side to that coin being,what if they did manage to create a riot.do you think they would sit in thier bedroom and think "oh no we were only joking".like f**k they would,they would have been thier helping themselfs to whatever they could get thier grubby little hands on.possibly even setting fire to a shop and killing someone.im just speculating here btw,same as you lot who are thinking.oh waht a shame,thats a bit harsh on the two lads who were only having a joke and acting hard.would you still find it funny if they had wrecked your business or burned you out of your home.seriously i cant believe in a short space of time,there some folk saying this is a bit harsh. maybe your sig indicates your likely to become an extremist and commit some act of terror. maybe every sighthound owner is going to hunt hares. maybe everyone who owns a gun for sporting purposes is going to go on a killing spree. maybes and might do's aren't crimes. I agree, likewise "I was just having a laugh" isnt an excuse. an excuse for what? what crime have they committed? could it be argued that talking about quarry taken pre-ban or abroad could incite someone to break the law here? thats where we are heading with this shit. the worst part is there are morons who are not only willing to accept it,but support it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted August 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 I think that the judicial got it wrong this time round, yes by all means execute them b*****ds that brought havoc and mayhem to the streets, but ffs two lads sitting at home trying to be hard on the FB site, this type of sentencing makes a mockery of the whole system. The system would be best served were they to channel their resources into the finding and bringing to justice the filth that caused such mayhem instead of wasting time on two young pups taking the piss from their bedrooms. oh do you know these to lads aswell? all very well people speculating on these two face book c**ts,do you know thier previous convictions or what type of lads they are.yea like i said if i was them and in thier position,all day long im gonna say it was a joke to the law.flip side to that coin being,what if they did manage to create a riot.do you think they would sit in thier bedroom and think "oh no we were only joking".like f**k they would,they would have been thier helping themselfs to whatever they could get thier grubby little hands on.possibly even setting fire to a shop and killing someone.im just speculating here btw,same as you lot who are thinking.oh waht a shame,thats a bit harsh on the two lads who were only having a joke and acting hard.would you still find it funny if they had wrecked your business or burned you out of your home.seriously i cant believe in a short space of time,there some folk saying this is a bit harsh. maybe your sig indicates your likely to become an extremist and commit some act of terror. maybe every sighthound owner is going to hunt hares. maybe everyone who owns a gun for sporting purposes is going to go on a killing spree. maybes and might do's aren't crimes. I agree, likewise "I was just having a laugh" isnt an excuse. an excuse for what? what crime have they committed? could it be argued that talking about quarry taken pre-ban or abroad could incite someone to break the law here? thats where we are heading with this shit. the worst part is there are morons who are not only willing to accept it,but support it. trying to incite a riot is the crime they commited. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,974 Posted August 18, 2011 Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 I think that the judicial got it wrong this time round, yes by all means execute them b*****ds that brought havoc and mayhem to the streets, but ffs two lads sitting at home trying to be hard on the FB site, this type of sentencing makes a mockery of the whole system. The system would be best served were they to channel their resources into the finding and bringing to justice the filth that caused such mayhem instead of wasting time on two young pups taking the piss from their bedrooms. oh do you know these to lads aswell? all very well people speculating on these two face book c**ts,do you know thier previous convictions or what type of lads they are.yea like i said if i was them and in thier position,all day long im gonna say it was a joke to the law.flip side to that coin being,what if they did manage to create a riot.do you think they would sit in thier bedroom and think "oh no we were only joking".like f**k they would,they would have been thier helping themselfs to whatever they could get thier grubby little hands on.possibly even setting fire to a shop and killing someone.im just speculating here btw,same as you lot who are thinking.oh waht a shame,thats a bit harsh on the two lads who were only having a joke and acting hard.would you still find it funny if they had wrecked your business or burned you out of your home.seriously i cant believe in a short space of time,there some folk saying this is a bit harsh. maybe your sig indicates your likely to become an extremist and commit some act of terror. maybe every sighthound owner is going to hunt hares. maybe everyone who owns a gun for sporting purposes is going to go on a killing spree. maybes and might do's aren't crimes. I agree, likewise "I was just having a laugh" isnt an excuse. an excuse for what? what crime have they committed? could it be argued that talking about quarry taken pre-ban or abroad could incite someone to break the law here? thats where we are heading with this shit. the worst part is there are morons who are not only willing to accept it,but support it. Are you really that stupid? Talking about an illegal act and trying to organise one are two completely different things! I can talk about how to build a nuclear weapon and the destruction they cause from a purely academic point all I want but as soon as I start putting up a wanted add for enriched uranium to build one the authorities are gonna start to take an interest! And so they fecking should! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.