gonetoearth 5,144 Posted September 2, 2009 Report Share Posted September 2, 2009 (edited) THE BLATANT MIS REPORTING IN THIS PAPER IS SICKENING THE USE OF PHOTOS OF A HARE AND GREYHOUNDS AT ANOTHER MEET NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE AND THE CHILDISH COMMENTS BY THE REPORTER BELONG IN SOME STUDENT RAG AND ARE A DISGRACE, THE JORNALIST LUSY THORNTON IS AN ANTI SEND HER AN EMAIL lucy.thornton@mirror.co.uk Edited September 2, 2009 by gonetoearth Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poacher3161 1,766 Posted September 2, 2009 Report Share Posted September 2, 2009 Can anybody put it up.Its nothing new as i would dare say 90pct of tabloid journalists are antis. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted September 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 2, 2009 JUST LOOKED HER UP LUCY THORNTON POTS AND KETTLES SPRING TO MIND , Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Leeview 792 Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 not all reporters are anti pre-ban the Old Yorks were approached by the bbc as to wether they could film and report on a meeting, it was agreed as there was nothing to hide, the day went smoothly they interviewedand asked lots of questions to people in the crowd, and were generally surprised with what they saw and found out what really happens for themselves. The upshot was they came back the next day without cameras or recording equipment as they wanted to see the outcome, they turned up at several more meetings that season joined as members and eventually took shares in their own dog to run. So not all are anti a lot are blinkered as are many of the public through reading misleading accounts of what REALLY happens Y.I.S Leeview Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poacher3161 1,766 Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Maybe not all reporters but with my sister being a reporter for the BBC i would say a large proportion of them are just going on wat i have heard.The film the BBC did on coursing was well put over for once.atb dell Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shepp 2,285 Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Well that's a left wing paper and it just spews out the default left wing opinion. Just a bunch of urban ill informed lefties. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 I wouldn't use the Mirror to wipe my arse on. More so after the disgraceful way they printed those (obviously) fake pictures of our Squaddies supposedly pissing on prisoners as if they were gospel. The way they treated stories about our lads when the Iraq war II first kicked off was amount to treason IMO, I'll never buy that paper again as long as I live. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
fin and fur 2 Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 The Daily Mirror like many tabloids does seem to have a problem when it comes to staying with the factually accurate. come to think of it, its not just the tabloids, or even the papers, the BBC shows a huge bias these days which is rather sad when you think that it is funded by all of us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sterry 0 Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Cant stand tabloids for all those reasons, in that article it said that she escaped with no conviction...the next line had a quote "This is a clear message to all those who course will be punished and no-one is above the law".........thats not how i read that, i read it to show the law is unworkable and pointless. I like the "real paper" the other day The Guardian had several articles on how important grouse shooting is to the countryside....it was a pleasant change from the norm of "all hunters are savages" type articles in the mirror and other comic books. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shepp 2,285 Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 I think views are changing among the more rational urban public, i think it is due to the realisation that them who forced the ban are socially inept and basically just people haters who strive to find a cause to make them feel marally superior to the rest of us. I would say the great unwashed will make less noise if the ban is overturned than people realise due to them now jumping on the climate change band wagon and glueing themselves to the RBS windows. What a bunch of prats. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.