Joe1888
-
Content Count
1,813 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by Joe1888
-
Joe, I'm sure you are aware that the NHS in Scotland is already devolved to the Scottish parliament. Salmond is bare faced lying when he says Westminster will privatise the NHS in Scotland...... Only Salmond and the Scottish parliament have the power to do that. Its well explained what the risk is, how it will effect the nhs... nice try What do you mean, nice try ? I'm right, and if you are as informed as you think, then you'll know I am. with the nhs rapidly getting privatised down south, so far the scottish gov has protected the nhs, even with the previous cuts to the budge
-
Joe, I'm sure you are aware that the NHS in Scotland is already devolved to the Scottish parliament. Salmond is bare faced lying when he says Westminster will privatise the NHS in Scotland...... Only Salmond and the Scottish parliament have the power to do that. Its well explained what the risk is, how it will effect the nhs... nice try
-
Yous keeping trying to scare a no vote, like no campaign. Scots can see past it.. Whats the risk of staying in union???? How's the nhs down south The uk is the 4th most unequal country in the developed world..
-
sorry, the names mentioned above are not all the supporters, they have advised scottish gov on other options, that are also in the white paper... they all agree currency union is best, hence why yes are fighting for that first and formost.. if you want to see plan plan b,c,d,e,f etc is, go read 100% away now LOL
-
some of the experts supporting yes, advising scottish gov. i really need to take abrake lol, one things for sure we wont agree...
-
Depends on how you look at it, the no side want people to think its all snp and about salmond, target salmond and hope to discredit him and bring down support for yes Yes is people of all parties, snp, labour for indy, greens, women for indy and more All sorts of voters/backgrounds and different views on how the country should go in future and now alot uk labour supporters are moving to yes, all agree on one thing. To fix whats been broken for a long time, the start is voting yes and taking control. Not painting face blue and shouting freedom as some believe, its not about the past, it
-
time for a break.. no matter what said, myself and you guys down south wont agree on this one
-
I haven't said that...... your view is that it's a benefit. Mine is that it's a risk not worth taking. Are you seriously so ignorant you can't accept somebody that's not a Scottish nationalist might take a different view? you said both woud be worse off... the benefits are clear, the pound wont continue drop like it has now, boe keeps balence of payments, no extra trade costs, jobs secure, scotland takes share of debt are some cant you accept people voting yes arent all notionalists and its not about the snp/salmond
-
Luxenburg and Belgium, two countries reknowned for their feeling of nationalism and individuality..... I suspect British politics and sentiment differs somewhat to those two poxy countries. I have no idea what their situation was, but that's what they wanted. It ain't what I want! so lets be clear even it if benefited both scotland and the uk, you would still rather cut off noise than see scotland break away and do well using a currency union?
-
without it being underwritten by the bank of England it will be monopoly money nobody will touch with a proverbial barge pole rubbish.... when you have control over the oil and gas in the north sea that gives you a very good reason why people will deal with you. if scotland has so little to offer why are the english bending backwards to keep the union yes mate, why are the no campain scrambling with a few days left to try offer more limited powers than they already have... lets go for full power..
-
Yes......... that's why I don't want a currency union. I don't want a foreign state significantly effecting MY currency. I don't want a foreign state benefitting from the success of my economy. But this isn't about pros and cons, it's about your gamble on your future, the fate of which is in UK hands. f***ing madness! And the best way to silence that argument is present a contingency.... what will hapen to the pound with no currency union, what about balence of payments, extra trade costs, jobs, uk debt and interest payments.. how will the econemy be then? Worse off obvi
-
Yes......... that's why I don't want a currency union. I don't want a foreign state significantly effecting MY currency. I don't want a foreign state benefitting from the success of my economy. But this isn't about pros and cons, it's about your gamble on your future, the fate of which is in UK hands. f***ing madness! And the best way to silence that argument is present a contingency.... what will hapen to the pound with no currency union, what about balence of payments, extra trade costs, jobs, uk debt and interest payments.. how will the econemy be then?
-
without it being underwritten by the bank of England it will be monopoly money nobody will touch with a proverbial barge pole the same boe founded by a scot, the same boe that strength is part because of scotland, the same same boe depends of palence of payments from scotland.. did you watch that vid? what will happen to the pound with no currency union??
-
if it doesnt happen, we still use the pound debt free... or setup on our own, debt free just my opinion lol
-
What sort of analogy is that? If you're playing poker you don't tell your oponents anything, LOL. From that logic your band of merry jokers should not say anything "It's alright folks, we don't want them to know our plan, just trust us"........... hang on that is what they're doing. It's a f***ing alphabet currency so far! theres a list of posible options put foward by nobel prize winners, yes are fighting for one. plan a.... Well then I'd perhaps want a fecking Nobel Prize winner running my economic policy campaign and not the clown you do have! If he can't even regurgitat
-
inside cabinit misters say different... when it comes down to it uk has to agree.. did you watch that vid paul?
-
What sort of analogy is that? If you're playing poker you don't tell your oponents anything, LOL. From that logic your band of merry jokers should not say anything "It's alright folks, we don't want them to know our plan, just trust us"........... hang on that is what they're doing. It's a f***ing alphabet currency so far! theres a list of posible options put foward by nobel prize winners, yes are fighting for one. plan a....
-
didnt they also say no more devo powers etc two years ago? what are they saying now... also has there attempts to mislead/scare voters been proved.. good support over belfast hills today, support growing everywhere they have all publicly said no consistently over the last 12 months the only person saying anything different is Salmond because he knows hes scuppered without it. hence no plan B there could be3 plans b's lol, do you show your hand while playing poker, why fight for second best?
-
didnt they also say no more devo powers etc two years ago? what are they saying now... also has there attempts to mislead/scare voters been proved.. good support over belfast hills today, support growing everywhere they have all publicly said no consistently over the last 12 months the only person saying anything different is Salmond because he knows hes scuppered without it. hence no plan B they are proven to back track, osborne spoke out the other day about more powers and carmicheal didnt know what he was talking about... proven to back track when it suits,
-
didnt they also say no more devo powers etc two years ago? what are they saying now... also has there attempts to mislead/scare voters been proved.. good support over belfast hills today, support growing everywhere
-
would the strength of the pound drop if scotland wasnt in a currency union( its already droping at the moment), would that have an effect on the rest of uk aswell, as masssive debts, balence of payments, extra trade costs etc etc it makes sense to everyone...
-
before anyone says if you say no to debt etc it will cause this problem etc etc etc the debt is in uk name not iscotland, international law says iscotland cant default on a debts thats signed in the uk name. scotland is willing to take on its share of the debt, only if we get our fair share... scotland helped build the strength of the pound, its as much ours as any other nation in the uk scotland is being fair, its the uk gov trying to play hard ball, use campain tactics to put doubt in voters mind, scottish people can see through that
-
we will keep the pound either way, you wont accept what i say, have a watch
-
I know..... where have I said you won't do alright? But better than we will together? NAH....... The entire point in the Union is to give us strength and stability! Economically, politically and militarily! we wont have as big army and nucs, thats it... i can sleep at night with a yes vote
-
You cannot draw that conclusion as you do not KNOW and have no experience of being fully independant. You'll be able to make that judgement 20, 30, 40, 50 years after independance. Good luck... how many countries have won indy and asked to rejoin, we are a skilled people with the bonus of good resources I don't care.... you still can't draw that judgement.... None!! Does scotland have what it takes to do well, yes... All of the "big" names agree, even david cameron