Jump to content

shaaark

Members
  • Content Count

    14,937
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by shaaark

  1. Yeah, they all say that, HEATHEN!! ?
  2. You are forgiven, brother. ?
  3. Come on now, blacky. Do you not think 'artillery' is a word that is a tad over the top, when he's using probably the best tool to stalk and shoot rabbits with? Said in a 'playful, puppylike nature'!! ?
  4. Fcuk all, mate, was just chewin the fat with brother neck. Shot a few 'varmints' myself, pretty recently. But I like to keep it quiet like. A lot of these dog lads get upset by people that shoot, for some reason. ? Oooh did I tap that out in plain site?! ?
  5. Understandable, blacky, those fukin rifle lads, I despair! ?
  6. Yes gnash, I could've put it better, I suppose, but you get what I was getting at. How anyone can actually believe that fury is a technically skillful boxer totally baffles me!! And bleating on about how he's just beaten another technically poor as f**k fighter, in wilder, as though it was a superb performance by fury! As I said before, I really can't see what the f**k they are watching/looking at when they watch fury fight?!
  7. I didn't say he was a 'journeyman', I said he was a top sparring partner for some 'great' heavyweights. World champion from 1978 - 1985. So how good do you think they were back then? You're getting as ridiculous as max, concerning fury. Fury wouldn't have got a shot at any of the top 10 heavyweights from that era, and would've been laughed at due to his herky jerky, clumsy 'style' while training!! In the words of rambo, yet again, 'let it go' ? ?
  8. Magoo, listen up, mate, seriously. Larry holmes, world champion from 1978 - 1985, was a 'sparring parter to frazier, young, ali. 48 fights 48 wins. You really aint seeing the woods for the trees. Not just you either. ?
  9. Because 40 odd years ago, even 'journeymen, sparring partners' had a bit about them, and could/would offer some very good learning/experience, proper rounds of sparring/fighting. Magoo, seriously, have a look at wilder's resume, NOT just his record, but RESUME. You will quickly see he's fought NO-ONE. His biggest test BY FAR, is fury. And he's lost 3 out of 3, yet he still put fury on his arse what, 4 or 5 times in 3 fights?! Then have a look at fury's resume, and you'll also quickly see, that apart from klitschko, who didn't want to fight, that wilder is fury's best result! f***
  10. Kin el, Magoo. Being an unbeaten fighter that's fought poor opponents, doesn't make someone a great fighter! Lol Back to the mudhounds. As you were, Magoo. ? ?
  11. Great post, newkid. You have far more patience than me! Lol ?
  12. Lol yeah, listened to so much by these, I'm still forgetting when, what album, who 'covered' what?!! etc etc ? ?
  13. Because you questioned me, AFTER I said I'm tired! ?? Anyway, seeing as you're a fury fan, look up both fury and wilder's resumes, and at their respective opposition, then draw your own conclusion as to wilder's punch power, and fury's ability. Once you've 'digested' that, and let it sink in, you'll realise both are pretty poor, wilder especially. Right, I'm away to deal with a bit of business. ? ?
  14. Your eyes need a break? I said I'm tired. ?
  15. If wilder has such power, howcome he couldn't keep fury down? And before you say something like 'fury got a great chin and heart' howcome career cruiserweights have put fury on the canvass as well, and he's got up from them and went on to win. So does wilder hit harder than those cruiserweights that put fury down?
  16. ? your resolve weakening Magoo?! ?? Well, if fury's to be believed, he had a few 'interruptions' leading up to the fight. Maybe that played it's part?
  17. ? I honestly don't see wilder ever beating fury, even if they fought another three times. Wilder is probably the poorest fighter that fury has fought, and that was pretty obvious, or should've been, after the 1st fight. As I said a few weeks ago, he's got nothing to trouble fury with. ?
  18. As I said, Magoo, that fight would've been stopped on that cut, if the fight had been anywhere else in the world. So from that point, fury was very lucky. Anyway, besides that, do you think a 4th fight between fury and wilder is needed, will generate much interest, or is doing heavyweight boxing any favours? Not looking to argue, or owt along those lines, just interested in how you see it, as you're an obvious fury fan. And might possibly be looking at these modern fights in a different way to some of us that are a generation older than guys like yourself. ?
  19. Ooh, well done Magoo, you're taking more interest in fury's fights than I am lol. Do you agree then, that he was VERY VERY lucky to get the win against wallin?
  20. Wilder hasen't been 'banned'. I'd be more inclined to put money on wallin, rather than whyte. Especially considering he should've been given the decision against fury, when he won ALL the early rounds in they're fight, and openened up a cut over fury's eye, which WOULD'VE seen that fight stopped, anywhere else in the world.
×
×
  • Create New...