Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A little over a year ago i added a .22 hornet to my armoury, on my initial application i explained to my fao that it would be mainly used for foxes, he had no problem with this, and added it to my ticket still under use as Vermin Control ( thus i assume fox is regarded as Vermin :icon_redface: ) Anyway at least 90% of my permission is outside my issuing authorities area, soooooooo!! :icon_eek: if i am ever in a position where i have to produce my ticket to authorities on one of my permissions or more likely on the way home from a permission, what would happen if that area does not concider fox as vermin :thumbdown: Do you think it would be wise to ask my fao include "FOX " seperately on my ticket :notworthy::notworthy:

 

Cheers

Link to post

Hi mate !! don't quote me but "fox" is classed as vermin full stop.......... thus country wide! so it does not matter what constabulary you are in/under. i hope its answered your question. SS

 

call them first mate, The vermin on my FAC doesn't include fox (i have a .17hmr) i was told no fox, never!

 

It does vary with different areas so please do call them to cover your arse

 

:gunsmilie:

Link to post
Hi mate !! don't quote me but "fox" is classed as vermin full stop.......... thus country wide! so it does not matter what constabulary you are in/under. i hope its answered your question. SS

Not so, they are all different and interpret the law very differently.

 

Get it checked keith and get it put on there to be safe :thumbs:

Link to post
Hi mate !! don't quote me but "fox" is classed as vermin full stop.......... thus country wide! so it does not matter what constabulary you are in/under. i hope its answered your question. SS

totally wrong and could drop someone right in the brown stuff.

Link to post
Hi mate !! don't quote me but "fox" is classed as vermin full stop.......... thus country wide! so it does not matter what constabulary you are in/under. i hope its answered your question. SS

totally wrong and could drop someone right in the brown stuff.

Not at all, get your facts right - neither is right!

 

Keith, I would check it with your FEO, you asked for fox, so likely no problem.

 

BUT

 

In a situation where no separate condition has been added for fox, you are absolutely fine to shoot them on a vermin ticket. I am getting really sick of this debate, but here we go again...

 

There is only one law governing this: Firearms Acts, which state that you must abide by the conditions on your FAC.

 

Foxes can be shot with any weapon you like - air rifles too, if you can get one to work (separate debate, not touching it here).

 

The issue is that IF you don't see fox and vermin as one and the same, then if you shoot a fox when your ticket simply says vermin, you could be deemed to be in breach of your FAC conditions. That is the ONLY possible offence here.

 

The fact of the matter is that foxes, outside of this debate, are almost universally classed as vermin. Therefore, if your firearm certificate lists your rifle as being for vermin control, then this includes fox.

 

The grey area is introduced because Home Office guidelines, and most Police Forces, license fox separately. They do this to ensure that people cannot use fox as a good reason for a rimfire, and also to try to ensure that humane kills with sensible tools are used.

 

This separate licensing means that you end up with FAC conditions, some of which include fox and others don't. For example, my ticket has vermin for my rimfire, and specifically fox for all my CF tools. By implication, my vermin condition does not include fox.

 

HOWEVER, (Keith AFAIK this is you) if my ticket had no mention of fox anywhere upon it, then no implication is made. If I have never asked Police for guidance on this matter, then the ONLY thing I have to go on is the wording of my FAC. It does not reference any other document, it JUST says vermin.

 

Fox is vermin.

 

It is excluded by Home Office guidelines to make a differentiation due to typical fox calibre, not because it isn't vermin (one of the paragraphs implies as much).

 

THEREFORE, even if the CPS decided to prosecute someone with just vermin on their ticket (assuming of course they could prove you shot the fox at all!) then they would have to prove that a fox isn't vermin, or that the FAC holder should have known that a differentiation had been made.

 

This would fail because:

 

a. There is a very long line of people that could be called to testify to the fact that fox is vermin.

b. No reference is ever made on an FAC to any other document

c. Many Police Forces do classify fox as vermin for licensing purposes. Keith - looks like yours is one of them

 

Therefore, it is basically legal to do this.

 

HOWEVER, there is one caveat - do you really want to go to court to prove this? Someone has to, so make sure it's not you, check it with your FEO.

 

BUT, assuming they do license it as vermin, you are fine to shoot on land in other counties because it is the wording on YOUR ticket that counts, not someone else's ideas, as the ONLY possible offence here is being in breach of YOUR FAC conditions. If you are obeying the conditions, wherever you shoot, how can you be prosecuted by anyone?

Link to post

Seems rather odd the different counties have a differing outlook as to what is vermin,

 

thank god here fox is classed as vermin everywhere thus not leading to any confusion, :clapper:

 

 

seems a right pain if you have lots of shooting in another county.....

 

snap.

Link to post
Hi mate !! don't quote me but "fox" is classed as vermin full stop.......... thus country wide! so it does not matter what constabulary you are in/under. i hope its answered your question. SS

totally wrong and could drop someone right in the brown stuff.

Not at all, get your facts right - neither is right!

 

Keith, I would check it with your FEO, you asked for fox, so likely no problem.

 

BUT

 

In a situation where no separate condition has been added for fox, you are absolutely fine to shoot them on a vermin ticket. I am getting really sick of this debate, but here we go again...

 

There is only one law governing this: Firearms Acts, which state that you must abide by the conditions on your FAC.

 

Foxes can be shot with any weapon you like - air rifles too, if you can get one to work (separate debate, not touching it here).

 

The issue is that IF you don't see fox and vermin as one and the same, then if you shoot a fox when your ticket simply says vermin, you could be deemed to be in breach of your FAC conditions. That is the ONLY possible offence here.

 

The fact of the matter is that foxes, outside of this debate, are almost universally classed as vermin. Therefore, if your firearm certificate lists your rifle as being for vermin control, then this includes fox.

 

The grey area is introduced because Home Office guidelines, and most Police Forces, license fox separately. They do this to ensure that people cannot use fox as a good reason for a rimfire, and also to try to ensure that humane kills with sensible tools are used.

 

This separate licensing means that you end up with FAC conditions, some of which include fox and others don't. For example, my ticket has vermin for my rimfire, and specifically fox for all my CF tools. By implication, my vermin condition does not include fox.

 

HOWEVER, (Keith AFAIK this is you) if my ticket had no mention of fox anywhere upon it, then no implication is made. If I have never asked Police for guidance on this matter, then the ONLY thing I have to go on is the wording of my FAC. It does not reference any other document, it JUST says vermin.

 

Fox is vermin.

 

It is excluded by Home Office guidelines to make a differentiation due to typical fox calibre, not because it isn't vermin (one of the paragraphs implies as much).

 

THEREFORE, even if the CPS decided to prosecute someone with just vermin on their ticket (assuming of course they could prove you shot the fox at all!) then they would have to prove that a fox isn't vermin, or that the FAC holder should have known that a differentiation had been made.

 

This would fail because:

 

a. There is a very long line of people that could be called to testify to the fact that fox is vermin.

b. No reference is ever made on an FAC to any other document

c. Many Police Forces do classify fox as vermin for licensing purposes. Keith - looks like yours is one of them

 

Therefore, it is basically legal to do this.

 

HOWEVER, there is one caveat - do you really want to go to court to prove this? Someone has to, so make sure it's not you, check it with your FEO.

 

BUT, assuming they do license it as vermin, you are fine to shoot on land in other counties because it is the wording on YOUR ticket that counts, not someone else's ideas, as the ONLY possible offence here is being in breach of YOUR FAC conditions. If you are obeying the conditions, wherever you shoot, how can you be prosecuted by anyone?

Well Put Bud ;)

Link to post

told you different forces use differnt means. so would say fox as vermin others wont. i think they like to put it down on its own as granting a 308 with vermin on ticket would sound silly. where deer,fox and vermin looks better

Link to post
Hi mate !! don't quote me but "fox" is classed as vermin full stop.......... thus country wide! so it does not matter what constabulary you are in/under. i hope its answered your question. SS

totally wrong and could drop someone right in the brown stuff.

 

Apologies for the miss understanding!!

Link to post

This post is going down a common route, yeh?

 

We all know the lack of definision regarding fox/vermin blah blah blah. But, (and I have asked this question at least 5 times before), can anyone quote a single example of any shooter being prossecuted for shooting a fox with the "wrong" calibre????????????????

Link to post
This post is going down a common route, yeh?

 

We all know the lack of definision regarding fox/vermin blah blah blah. But, (and I have asked this question at least 5 times before), can anyone quote a single example of any shooter being prossecuted for shooting a fox with the "wrong" calibre????????????????

No! That's the point. When this occurs it will settle the debate once and for all.

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...