Jump to content

Slippery_Weasel

Donator
  • Content Count

    445
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Slippery_Weasel

  1. I've never seen or heard anything that I wasn't relatively sure I could explain away. The house we live in was built just after Waterloo and I would imagine that dozens of people will have died here since that time. I neither believe nor don't but I'm glad I've never seen anything.

     

    That said my eldest announced that he had seen a bloke on the landing the other night, that then disappeared down the stairs. All dressed in black, after checking the house, which I knew would be clear as they would of had to walk past both dogs. I asked him to describe what he saw. Half expecting a description of someone in old fashioned clothes etc I breathed a sigh of relief when the ghost turned out to be wearing track suit bottoms, Nike trainers and a baseball cap!

     

    Edited to add: great thread/posts/stories. Keep them coming, enjoyed reading

    • Like 1
  2. Mr Weasel, I think you give Janner more credit than he deserves, he stands accused (with VERY strong evidence from what I read) of f***ing kids ... Someone who can do this surely wouldn't give a second thought to swerving risking giving compensation to his victims?

     

    He did it, and he's now doing his best to stash his wealth where it can't be touched, as above Stuart Hall did the same thing, despicable b*****ds.

     

    I read the other day that even though it seems there were hundreds at it, the truth is that these enquiries haven't even scratched the surface of the full extent of the abuse that went on.

    Certainly not putting the swerving of compensation past him or any of his ilk. Just offering an alternative explanation of why someone older may transfer wealth. As I said before I've not followed the case other than the odd news snapshot so don't have an opinion on guilt or otherwise

    • Like 1
  3. Surely that must be classed as Tax Avoidance signing his wealth over ? Joe public would not get away with it like. Us and them again !

    The exact same rules apply to both public and posh people. It's just the tax law, the 7 years is just in place to stop people at deaths door quickly signing it over. Plenty of normal people do similar

    • Like 1
  4.  

    Don't know anything about the case really but I would have thought the reason he signed all his wealth over to his family is more likely to be due to inheritance tax. if he lives for over 7 years after signing it over the family will not pay inheritance tax on it. It's not likely to be because of fear of payouts

    Don't agree mate , my thoughts are if he has nothing , the chance of anyone suing him for compensation is a non starter .

    Like I said, I don't know anything about the case. It's just that the transfer of wealth 7 years prior to death is a fairly common way to avoid inheritance tax

  5. Don't know anything about the case really but I would have thought the reason he signed all his wealth over to his family is more likely to be due to inheritance tax. if he lives for over 7 years after signing it over the family will not pay inheritance tax on it. It's not likely to be because of fear of payouts

    • Like 1
  6.  

    Forget the cull being rolled out nationwide, just lift the protected status and let farmers sort their own pest control out

    I completely agree in principle. But of those two scenarios, which is more likely? LOL

     

    The badgers protection will never be lifted to put it on the same level as the fox.

    Likely is a strong word, I don't think it's likely. Less costly though if the gov could get sufficient support to get it through

  7. Well I'd say looking down the barrel of an anti aircraft with hundreds awaiting the ratattat is suffering but not bothered in the slightest, bet he's had plenty killed. They're a nation of mutters. Nk army 1 million so plenty left.

    Fair point

  8. Be a bout 5 weeks now sin i last had a fag, now its my birthday tomorrow, and one of my grandaughters has just brought me a few gifts, one of which is a 50 gram of old holborn, i hadnt the heart to tell her i no longer smoke, i still have the occasional urge for a fag, im buggered if i o what to do, should i, or shouldnt i, after all at my age, surely the damage has been done

    If you know someone who smokes give it away quickly or Fill packet with water and than bin it,

     

    Having it lying would too much of a temptation for me

    • Like 2
  9. Doesn't like going on concrete, has figured out the table is not so does it there.

    One of my dogs will not shit on short grass, he will wait and when he sees long stuff he goes.

    It will be something like this about the surface. One of mine prefers to shit in bushes or up steep banks with long grass, he sort of reverses his arse onto them. The other on short grass or gravel

×
×
  • Create New...