Jump to content

DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]

Members
  • Content Count

    716
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]

  1. This is how the RSPB control the law against us Re: UK Wildlife Laws - Public participation PROTECTION OF BIRDS (AMENDMENT) BILL HL Deb 26 July 1976 vol 373 cc1139-45 1139 § 7.49 p.m. Lord CHELWOOD My Lords, I beg to move that this Bill be now read a second time. This very short amending Bill passed through all its stages on the nod in another place on 16th July. That was something which I think was most unusual and, in my experience at any rate, unique. But it showed three things: first, that this amending Bill is not controversial; secondly, that it has the Government's blessing;
  2. a Reforming the law Steel House 11 Tothill Street London SW1H9LJ t 02033340262 f 02033340201 Derek Canning e wildlife@lawcommission.gsi.gov.uk xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 14 August 2012 Derek, First, my apologies for not having replied to you sooner, I was waiting until we had a copy of our consultation paper to send you. This, I have enclosed. Second, we have considered your comments and think that you may wish to make a formal submission in response to our consultation paper. We would the
  3. a Reforming the law Steel House 11 Tothill Street London SW1H9LJ t 02033340262 f 02033340201 Derek Canning e wildlife@lawcommission.gsi.gov.uk xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 14 August 2012 Derek, First, my apologies for not having replied to you sooner, I was waiting until we had a copy of our consultation paper to send you. This, I have enclosed. Second, we have considered your comments and think that you may wish to make a formal submission in response to our consultation paper. We would then be able
  4. I do not Yes it is, that is why there need to be a counter balance of views. FFS, this WILL NOT end well for the fieldsports community! Who is pushing for this anyway? Yes, it makes perfect logical sense to simplify law but those working against us don't use logic, they use emotion and anthropomorphism. Please tell me the shooting community have not pushed this on? It has been done now and the question is who can take advantage of it. So it was the shooting community? BASC? I do not know.
  5. Yes it is, that is why there need to be a counter balance of views. FFS, this WILL NOT end well for the fieldsports community! Who is pushing for this anyway? Yes, it makes perfect logical sense to simplify law but those working against us don't use logic, they use emotion and anthropomorphism. Please tell me the shooting community have not pushed this on? It has been done now and the question is who can take advantage of it.
  6. The point is, this is an opportunity to ask for changes that you feel should occur. OK, and I apologise for calling you David, I have just realised it is Derek. I have been called worse. why doesnt that surprise me Being a trailblazer it can be hard.
  7. The point is, this is an opportunity to ask for changes that you feel should occur. OK, and I apologise for calling you David, I have just realised it is Derek. I have been called worse.
  8. Changes to the law have your say http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/wildlife.htm
  9. Changes to the law, have your say http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/wildlife.htm
  10. Lovely pale Gyr/Saker Arctic... I'm sure you are going to have alot of sport and fun with him for the fourth coming season . I picked up a male off Lenny Walters in bonchester bridge in 95, he was meant for crows and started off well but at that time I was flying in a area with plenty of game which was irresistible to him, this male would attempt to plough into the ground with the same enthusiasm. I had much fun with him but fell foul of the landowner and keeper when he took a few head or Partridge and the odd pheasant, he then ended up in 96 going to a guys in stoke on trent and I ended
  11. Yes they should be made to pay all costs . dirty beeping scum bags What make the situation even worse is the fact the person that was accused cannot claim his costs against anyone. I would have thought that the RSPCA should be liable for the prosecution bill unless the CPS took the case over or the police agreed to use public money to pay for it. The courts do have power to order public found to be used.
  12. Very true about the prices of Goshawks, sadly AI has made it so easy for Goshawks to be bred putting them in the same league as Harris's. I reckon in a year or 2 they will be the same price or as near as dam it. it won't change until there is some sort of regulation in breeding and breeders having to pay an annual fee for the privilege of breeding and selling hawks n falcons. I know things are tight enough for people buying hawks and every other BOP but the main point should be making BOP expensive enough to ensure people are less likely to play about and look after their birds. it should a
  13. There is also the possible if you load more pressure and expense on harris hawk breeders, that find it hard to cover their costs as it is they will just open the aviary doors and let the breeding birds go because no one will take them on, which would make the problem even worse. Economics will cut in eventually given it cost more to produce harris hawks then you can make back by selling them and when people stop breeding them the price will go up. A gross over simplification I know but somewhere near the truth.
  14. And that make it OK for the police to do anything that they want without transparency and accountability? I can assure you I put up with a lot in my job and I have been attacked more times than the average policeman. We all put up with a lot in the jobs that we do, of course the police in some cases get paid a lot more. Notwithstanding what I have just said the one thing that the police tell me up set them the most is the politics and the red tape that ties their hands that is why we need transparency and accountability to the public so we can see when the police do a good job or not.
  15. I am not as clever as I want to be but I have not given any relevant details on the case I think you are referring to other than there is an investigation into XXX XXXXXXXXX. The facts in the thread are simple and as I said the thread is put out in the public domain for a greater reason than the peoples on the Forum. I could go on for months about my case but that is not what the thread is about.
  16. I am not on here to overturn my conviction that is in the hands of the Appeal Court via the CCRC. I am on here to try and bring about changes for the future so what happened to me will not happen in the future. It may seem an impossible dream but there is one thing for sure if you do nothing then nothing will happen besides I know things are changing and questions are being asked. Gone to earth asked what have you been charge with and you said ive not been charged now your saying your convicted so then what have you been covicted of You are missing the point this is not about me
  17. I am not on here to overturn my conviction that is in the hands of the Appeal Court via the CCRC. I am on here to try and bring about changes for the future so what happened to me will not happen in the future. It may seem an impossible dream but there is one thing for sure if you do nothing then nothing will happen besides I know things are changing and questions are being asked.
  18. It would not matter what I said or what evidence I produced you would still have your twisted view. Try reading the facts sometime; oh I forgot it would make no difference to you, you have closed your mind for your own personal reasons or should I say your friend.
×
×
  • Create New...