wetdogsmell 99 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 i was just looking at a few anti sites out of curiosoty and could'nt belive what was on them, don't get me wrong i was expecting alot of ill informed bullshite and was'nt dissapointed, but i could'nt belive under the titles VERMON and SCUM they had lists of names and adresses and photos to go with them of people in court for hunting related charges, alot of whom according to the site were found not guilty, i can't belive its legal to do this rant over Quote Link to post Share on other sites
salty81 8 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 i was just looking at a few anti sites out of curiosoty and could'nt belive what was on them, don't get me wrong i was expecting alot of ill informed bullshite and was'nt dissapointed, but i could'nt belive under the titles VERMON and SCUM they had lists of names and adresses and photos to go with them of people in court for hunting related charges, alot of whom according to the site were found not guilty, i can't belive its legal to do thisrant over whats the site mate Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 i was just looking at a few anti sites out of curiosoty and could'nt belive what was on them, don't get me wrong i was expecting alot of ill informed bullshite and was'nt dissapointed, but i could'nt belive under the titles VERMON and SCUM they had lists of names and adresses and photos to go with them of people in court for hunting related charges, alot of whom according to the site were found not guilty, i can't belive its legal to do thisrant over we should put there photos on here espesly the one who is accused of murder Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sykes 0 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 (edited) i was just looking at a few anti sites out of curiosoty and could'nt belive what was on them, don't get me wrong i was expecting alot of ill informed bullshite and was'nt dissapointed, but i could'nt belive under the titles VERMON and SCUM they had lists of names and adresses and photos to go with them of people in court for hunting related charges, alot of whom according to the site were found not guilty, i can't belive its legal to do thisrant over whats the site mate Edited March 16, 2009 by sykes Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest WILF Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 i was just looking at a few anti sites out of curiosoty and could'nt belive what was on them, don't get me wrong i was expecting alot of ill informed bullshite and was'nt dissapointed, but i could'nt belive under the titles VERMON and SCUM they had lists of names and adresses and photos to go with them of people in court for hunting related charges, alot of whom according to the site were found not guilty, i can't belive its legal to do thisrant over whats the site mate A famous one.........dont put up the link, feck em Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 i was just looking at a few anti sites out of curiosoty and could'nt belive what was on them, don't get me wrong i was expecting alot of ill informed bullshite and was'nt dissapointed, but i could'nt belive under the titles VERMON and SCUM they had lists of names and adresses and photos to go with them of people in court for hunting related charges, alot of whom according to the site were found not guilty, i can't belive its legal to do thisrant over whats the site mate this gets my back up aswell or hunt watch but be carfull they will trace your log in Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wetdogsmell 99 Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 fukking smelly hairy cxnts, and there was a warning on one site saying (be careful adresses may have changed) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bignoel 14 Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 give them what they want the flat side of a spade traveling at 60mph 8asterds Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SEAN3513 7 Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 leave em to it............don't give them the publicity they crave. cheers sean Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JPTfellterrier 65 Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 that cant be legal, and i would be very suprised if it is Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Leveller Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 i could'nt belive under the titles VERMON Is that anything like Vermont? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest jt750 Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 FWW here's my view. Is it a public forum or site where every tom dick and harry can see the content ..then the answer is probably yes they might be breaking some privacy laws.If its a private site where you have to join or subscribe to access the content then maybe no the're not breaking any laws. One other point for me is i walked the walk with the countryside alliance to stop this act of parliment going through which changed the face of hunting forever in this country. I've also talked to *your so called* antis. Some people here seem to think they are a bunch of tree hugging organic sprout eating idiots. Let me tell you in no uncertain terms they are not what you think they are. They are often highly intelligent influential people who truely believe what they are doing is right and proper and argue a very good case for it too. They do understand the need for control of foxes its the methods used they disagree with. Do I think hunting will ever come back ..No not in its previous form but maybe in some limited capacity. No hare coursing no hunting deer with dogs. Fox control yes. One of my major concerns is sites like this that have nudge nudge wink wink attitude and WTF is pre ban all about. While this goes on and the people concerned doing it and keep posting that they are doing it you will NEVER EVER get anything in that bill overturned. Who do you think you are fooling with this attitude of nudge nudge wink wink say no more. FFS someone posted pics of a terrier on a lead on the outside of what looks to be a badger sett( the spoil the straw gave it away) and it just coming. God knows how many laws he broke there 2 i can think of. You keep posting here and giving fuel to the antis you will have no hunting in this country at all or it will be licensed to a degree that the ordinary man in the street cannot afford to do it. AND this will happen i can see it coming Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scent 509 Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 theres one of them living VERY close to me ,she keeps two pet badgers out her back which i thought was illegal shes the main woman in Badger Watch ireland ,what a piece of work this one is Quote Link to post Share on other sites
droid 11 Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 FWW here's my view. Is it a public forum or site where every tom dick and harry can see the content ..then the answer is probably yes they might be breaking some privacy laws.If its a private site where you have to join or subscribe to access the content then maybe no the're not breaking any laws.One other point for me is i walked the walk with the countryside alliance to stop this act of parliment going through which changed the face of hunting forever in this country. I've also talked to *your so called* antis. Some people here seem to think they are a bunch of tree hugging organic sprout eating idiots. Let me tell you in no uncertain terms they are not what you think they are. They are often highly intelligent influential people who truely believe what they are doing is right and proper and argue a very good case for it too. They do understand the need for control of foxes its the methods used they disagree with. Do I think hunting will ever come back ..No not in its previous form but maybe in some limited capacity. No hare coursing no hunting deer with dogs. Fox control yes. One of my major concerns is sites like this that have nudge nudge wink wink attitude and WTF is pre ban all about. While this goes on and the people concerned doing it and keep posting that they are doing it you will NEVER EVER get anything in that bill overturned. Who do you think you are fooling with this attitude of nudge nudge wink wink say no more. FFS someone posted pics of a terrier on a lead on the outside of what looks to be a badger sett( the spoil the straw gave it away) and it just coming. God knows how many laws he broke there 2 i can think of. You keep posting here and giving fuel to the antis you will have no hunting in this country at all or it will be licensed to a degree that the ordinary man in the street cannot afford to do it. AND this will happen i can see it coming True. It's been said many times on here by the mods that people need to think before they post, but still it happens, the and the 'pre-ban' nonsense. Still, it's much easier to blame someone else than your own stupidity, is it not? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wetdogsmell 99 Posted March 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 i could'nt belive under the titles VERMON Is that anything like Vermont? sorry about the bad spelling i only went to school for the milk and sandwitches Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.