Guest night time my time Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 well said ntmt people can spout of about the ca all day long the truth of the matter is they are a waste of time and money. the sooner people wake up to that the better. the lurcher owner is at the bottom of theyre list of priorities . when have they taken the rspca to task they have access to the press at a national level when ever have they come out of hiding to denounce the rspca propaganda and tell the public that lurcher owners are not badger baiters or people who are out in the country side burgling farms and rural houses or violent criminals intent on violence. why dont they challenge the rspca through the courts and let it be known they have no rights to enter peoples property and remove perfectly healthy animals when said people are not at home the rspca are a volountary organisation of misfits who deck themselves out in uniforms and mass slaughter thousands of healthy animals every year why are the ca not doing this i will tell you why because they are a spineless bunch of tossers thats why who will take our money and bum it away else where we are on our own and until we band together like i said in another thread we are f****d . the foxhunting act will be relaxed (its not policed now ) where more hounds will be allowed but untill we lurcher owners form our own group and fight our own corner its only going to get worse for us and we will never get the support of the hunt or any other group like we have given them in the past. whats needed is for the ca to be mass petitioned and forced into taking action to challenge the law regarding dog confiscation and vehicle taking along with mobile phones and driving licences and land owners being allowed to ram vehicles being driven on the high way just because they have lurchers in the vehicle this mass hysteria being generated by the police and rspca to the general public has gone on long enough and should be challenged by the ca in the high courts if they are not prepared to do this they should say so and stop taking the lurcher owners money . every member of this site should take ten mins to write a letter to the ca asking them why they have not done any of the above they wont even answer its all well and good members thinking to themselfs this dont bother me because ive got permission well it does bother you because the league and the rspcs are already petitioning parliament to make further bans and farmers that allow people onto theyre land to have subsidies stopped . subsidies which are paid by lurcher owning tax payers there are thousands of members on this site its time we stuck together and started making the ca represent us or let them know we are going else where100% spot on Quote Link to post Share on other sites
J Darcy 5,871 Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 well said ntmt people can spout of about the ca all day long the truth of the matter is they are a waste of time and money. the sooner people wake up to that the better. the lurcher owner is at the bottom of theyre list of priorities . when have they taken the rspca to task they have access to the press at a national level when ever have they come out of hiding to denounce the rspca propaganda and tell the public that lurcher owners are not badger baiters or people who are out in the country side burgling farms and rural houses or violent criminals intent on violence. why dont they challenge the rspca through the courts and let it be known they have no rights to enter peoples property and remove perfectly healthy animals when said people are not at home the rspca are a volountary organisation of misfits who deck themselves out in uniforms and mass slaughter thousands of healthy animals every year why are the ca not doing this i will tell you why because they are a spineless bunch of tossers thats why who will take our money and bum it away else where we are on our own and until we band together like i said in another thread we are f****d . the foxhunting act will be relaxed (its not policed now ) where more hounds will be allowed but untill we lurcher owners form our own group and fight our own corner its only going to get worse for us and we will never get the support of the hunt or any other group like we have given them in the past. whats needed is for the ca to be mass petitioned and forced into taking action to challenge the law regarding dog confiscation and vehicle taking along with mobile phones and driving licences and land owners being allowed to ram vehicles being driven on the high way just because they have lurchers in the vehicle this mass hysteria being generated by the police and rspca to the general public has gone on long enough and should be challenged by the ca in the high courts if they are not prepared to do this they should say so and stop taking the lurcher owners money . every member of this site should take ten mins to write a letter to the ca asking them why they have not done any of the above they wont even answer its all well and good members thinking to themselfs this dont bother me because ive got permission well it does bother you because the league and the rspcs are already petitioning parliament to make further bans and farmers that allow people onto theyre land to have subsidies stopped . subsidies which are paid by lurcher owning tax payers there are thousands of members on this site its time we stuck together and started making the ca represent us or let them know we are going else where Brookie for Prime Minister..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest night time my time Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 well said ntmt people can spout of about the ca all day long the truth of the matter is they are a waste of time and money. the sooner people wake up to that the better. the lurcher owner is at the bottom of theyre list of priorities . when have they taken the rspca to task they have access to the press at a national level when ever have they come out of hiding to denounce the rspca propaganda and tell the public that lurcher owners are not badger baiters or people who are out in the country side burgling farms and rural houses or violent criminals intent on violence. why dont they challenge the rspca through the courts and let it be known they have no rights to enter peoples property and remove perfectly healthy animals when said people are not at home the rspca are a volountary organisation of misfits who deck themselves out in uniforms and mass slaughter thousands of healthy animals every year why are the ca not doing this i will tell you why because they are a spineless bunch of tossers thats why who will take our money and bum it away else where we are on our own and until we band together like i said in another thread we are f****d . the foxhunting act will be relaxed (its not policed now ) where more hounds will be allowed but untill we lurcher owners form our own group and fight our own corner its only going to get worse for us and we will never get the support of the hunt or any other group like we have given them in the past. whats needed is for the ca to be mass petitioned and forced into taking action to challenge the law regarding dog confiscation and vehicle taking along with mobile phones and driving licences and land owners being allowed to ram vehicles being driven on the high way just because they have lurchers in the vehicle this mass hysteria being generated by the police and rspca to the general public has gone on long enough and should be challenged by the ca in the high courts if they are not prepared to do this they should say so and stop taking the lurcher owners money . every member of this site should take ten mins to write a letter to the ca asking them why they have not done any of the above they wont even answer its all well and good members thinking to themselfs this dont bother me because ive got permission well it does bother you because the league and the rspcs are already petitioning parliament to make further bans and farmers that allow people onto theyre land to have subsidies stopped . subsidies which are paid by lurcher owning tax payers there are thousands of members on this site its time we stuck together and started making the ca represent us or let them know we are going else where Brookie for Prime Minister..... I'd vote for him,anyone contacted the CA on these matters yet? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest blackntan Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 THE PROBLEM IS THEY ARE NOT A GANG OF MISFITS THEY ARE NOW A HIGHLY ORGANIZED WELL FUNDED GROUP OF ANTIS IN THE RSPCA UNIFORM , THE LACS AS IVE SAID BEFORE HAVE INFILTRATED THE RSPCA , I CHALLENGE ANY ONE ON HERE TO APPLY FOR A JOB AS A RSPCA FULL TIME OFFICER AND SEE HOW THEY VET ANY PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES Quote Link to post Share on other sites
brookie 1,193 Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 if this is known why aint people in the know exposing this the ca have been content for to long just taking a back seat taking the money and doing nothing in my opinion they are misfits but very dangerous ones at that not so long ago we accessed the lacs website they were openly bragging on there that they had accessed this site and were posing on here as members i pm ian at the time informing him of this . its time we started to stand up for ourselves and jointly petitioned the ca to start standing up and fighting for the lurcher owners or look else where for support Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Little Butch 16 Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 (edited) Nice one Brooky... You've got the right Idea! About time we stuck Together and fought these Scumbags Instead of sitting here arguing amongst each other. Butch Edited December 14, 2008 by Little Butch Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 I'd vote for him,anyone contacted the CA on these matters yet? Frankly I'm sick of contacting the CA about anything. They don't reply but do regularly send me marketing leaflets for donations, membership etc. Infact the time I contacted them to check an online petition, to the Hunting Act, they did so. Did they support it? No! They set up their own and split the vote between the two diluting what would have been something pretty special. The day the CA represent the average hunter and don't spunk donations on nice salaries and champagne for the gamefairs is the day I just might start to gravitate towards them again. Afterall we all managed to get this site going without taking a single penny in wages and we have been doing for over 4 years. So why can't they? This isn't infighting it's about value for money. If you'd bought a load of shit kennel equipment you wouldn't hesitate to stick the boot in yet the CA have been taking your money for years and have done exactly f**k all to stop the ban, relax the ban or overturn the ban. They are in no position to do f**k all apart from offer a fancy website with up to date information. Like this site but without the annual membership. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
J Darcy 5,871 Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 Well they get nothing from me anymore....... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
brookie 1,193 Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 all it takes is one letter to the cmw with the signatures of all the members of this site and also the cmw to be told that it is expected to high light these grievances to the ca through the magazine. also a recorded letter sent to the ca telling them that under the rights of disclosure they are obliged by law to state how much money they take out of membership fees per year in salaries . make it known to them that if they are not prepared to fight for us then f**k em Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Crow 1 Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 As a responsible lurcherman I wanted to get some insurance for when I'm rabbiting, just to give the landowner that peace of mind that he/she may want when I walk my lurcher out on their land. I looked around and found £5m cover for £180 per annum until I told them I have a dog - it jumped up to £340! So I joined the CA, and for the normal yearly rate of £52 I get £10m cover which includes the use of my dog - there's also accident cover and loss of life included too. Now, I don't really care what the CA 'spunk' their money on, I'm sure some goes on entertaining and other goes on whatever it goes on, but as far as I'm concerned that's the best insurance package out there and well worth my membership fee alone. Crow Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest blackntan Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 Ive attended various anti , lacs, and rspca meetings they are not the only ones who monitor others , another good one is my old friends at hunt watch , i allso pay my subs to CA, BASC, AS YTHE INSURANCE COVER IS WORTH IT , as for theCA not knowing of lacs members working for the rspca its not rocket science is it, as for the lacs being on this site hellow scruffs , i like them being on here as it show them we are a growing sport not an organization in decline, UNLIKE SOME , I WEAR MY LACS BADGE WITH PRIDE ALONG SIDE MY WAGBI, BFSS, COURSING CLUB, MANCHESTER BULL FIGHTING SUPPORTERS CLUB, FMWTC , ETC , SEE YOU BOXING DAY Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.