TOMO 28,462 Posted Thursday at 09:28 Report Share Posted Thursday at 09:28 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Borr 7,688 Posted Thursday at 09:44 Report Share Posted Thursday at 09:44 Yep what sentence indeed, could only charge on the females? Probably due to the kick from the copper, couldn't decide on abh or something.. these better get years as we know what a tweet can get you or felling a tree....I still think they should've shot them, let's face it as well , since they've removed height restrictions and encouraged loads of females into the force it doesn't really fill you with confidence that when the time comes they're gonna be able to deal with violent offenders...and you could say arm them but... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 28,462 Posted Thursday at 09:50 Author Report Share Posted Thursday at 09:50 4 minutes ago, Borr said: Yep what sentence indeed, could only charge on the females? Probably due to the kick from the copper, couldn't decide on abh or something.. these better get years as we know what a tweet can get you or felling a tree....I still think they should've shot them, let's face it as well , since they've removed height restrictions and encouraged loads of females into the force it doesn't really fill you with confidence that when the time comes they're gonna be able to deal with violent offenders...and you could say arm them but... I said at the time shame they weren't shot as a potential terrorist attack 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,587 Posted Thursday at 11:00 Report Share Posted Thursday at 11:00 There’s going to be a retrial on the charges that the jury didn’t agree on . Cheers. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.