Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 3 hours ago, Goly said: What's it matter, it's only just different bone sizes, shapes, density, they're all mammals, cats & dogs are just the same. Lol I would say the neandertals are just humans that were born before the flood,bigger stronger an more healthier,or there just skeletons of big humans,giants,there's alot of them mentioned in the bible,an cause there's only been a couple found 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 So you are claiming Neanderthals are just human, you do know that there's even more archaic humans that were wandering earth before the Neanderthal? But ok, so they are exactly the same as homosapiens, where are they now then? Or are you saying that we evolved quite drastically from them within the space of 6000 years? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 15 minutes ago, Francie, said: So tell me,what do you call this discovery so I can look it up,because apparently there's only a couple of neandertal ever found,very strange that isn't it that only a couple has been found? If we done a random test an we got a few skeletons from different people around the world,say an Eskimo,a big African,a wee Chinese man,a big Scandinavian man,etc are you telling me that there skeletons will all match perfectly with the skeleton on the right that you posted,I don't think so No, variation would be minute, like it would be in most individuals, even those pygmies would have the same skeletal characteristics of modern humans, Neanderthals clearly have a difference skeletal structure, what have you got for eyes? Look at the massive skull, the prominent brow, massive nasal cavities, massive wide hips, thick and massive bone structure. Skin Mike Tyson and he still wouldn't look that that! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 17 minutes ago, Goly said: So you are claiming Neanderthals are just human, you do know that there's even more archaic humans that were wandering earth before the Neanderthal? But ok, so they are exactly the same as homosapiens, where are they now then? Or are you saying that we evolved quite drastically from them within the space of 6000 years? OK so I just googled this,does these differences in skeletons mean that wolfs were not dogs then,or the other way about? Your argument that says neandertals aren't humans does not stand up mate Yes, wolves and dogs have different skeletons, especially in their skulls. These differences are due to domestication and the different diets of wolves and dogs. Skull Cranium: Dogs have a wider cranium, rounder cranium, and a shorter snout than wolves Orbital angle: Dogs have a wider orbital angle than wolves Forehead: Dogs have a more pronounced vertical drop, or "stop", in the front of their forehead Eardrum: Dogs have a reduced bony case of their eardrum Teeth: Dogs have smaller teeth and tooth crowding Molars: Dogs have reduced molar size Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 1 minute ago, Francie, said: OK so I just googled this,does these differences in skeletons mean that wolfs were not dogs then,or the other way about? Your argument that says neandertals aren't humans does not stand up mate Yes, wolves and dogs have different skeletons, especially in their skulls. These differences are due to domestication and the different diets of wolves and dogs. Skull Cranium: Dogs have a wider cranium, rounder cranium, and a shorter snout than wolves Orbital angle: Dogs have a wider orbital angle than wolves Forehead: Dogs have a more pronounced vertical drop, or "stop", in the front of their forehead Eardrum: Dogs have a reduced bony case of their eardrum Teeth: Dogs have smaller teeth and tooth crowding Molars: Dogs have reduced molar size They are humans, but they aren't modern humans, homosapiens! Now here's something that is relatively new and very surprising. The genomes of non-Africans, that's me, you & most on here, contains around 2-3% Neanderthal DNA, a new study cites that in reality our ancestry is about 10-20% Neanderthal, mind-blowing eh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 29,522 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 Anyone with an interest in anthropology try and visit the natural history museum,I think they even have a model of home floresiensis. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 4 minutes ago, mackem said: Anyone with an interest in anthropology try and visit the natural history museum,I think they even have a model of home floresiensis. Shave and a trim and Francie would never know! 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 It's mind blowing to think that modern humans from regions outside of Africa may be 10-20% Neanderthal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 6 minutes ago, Goly said: It's mind blowing to think that modern humans from regions outside of Africa may be 10-20% Neanderthal. Why would it be mind blown goly,its only logical lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 1 minute ago, Francie, said: Why would it be mind blown goly,its only logical lol Not really considering we only have about 2-3% of their DNA. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 11 minutes ago, Goly said: It's mind blowing to think that modern humans from regions outside of Africa may be 10-20% Neanderthal. I thought you said ten to 20percent lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 8 minutes ago, Goly said: Not really considering we only have about 2-3% of their DNA. Mate your to hung up on dna,chimps have 98% of human dna,elephants have 90% cat have 90% chickens ffs have 75% An your saying neandertal have only 2 to 3% of human dna but they look the closest to humans than the rest above,how does that work out? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 5 minutes ago, Francie, said: I thought you said ten to 20percent lol Yeah, ancestry, not genetically. When our ancestors bred with Neanderthals, the Neanderthal DNA was rejected, have a guess why? It's because we had been isolated for half a million years when they separated from our ancestors. So, we were still genetically close enough to breed and produce offspring, but there was selection to remove the Neanderthal ancestry. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 6 minutes ago, Francie, said: Mate your to hung up on dna,chimps have 98% of human dna,elephants have 90% cat have 90% chickens ffs have 75% An your saying neandertal have only 2 to 3% of human dna but they look the closest to humans than the rest above,how does that work out? Mate, you can't see the wood for the trees, you can't grasp it, our DNA is around 99.7% identical to Neanderthals, I can't be arsed to go in to details, read up on it, I'm getting ready for work. Lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 34 minutes ago, Goly said: Not really considering we only have about 2-3% of their DNA. Well why did you say here 2 to 3 percent lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.