Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 1 hour ago, Goly said: The creationists lose all their logic when they try and manoeuvre around posing questions. I mean how can they explain archaic humans that have been around for millions of years? And more recent humans like the Neanderthal, still around half a million years old. Hahahaha archaic humans,give us an example,neanderthal we're humans mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Francie, said: Hahahaha archaic humans,give us an example,neanderthal we're humans mate. Yes, they were humans, but they definitely weren't homosapiens, neither were denisovans, erectus, etc. Have you seen the morphological differences, let alone genetic. You claim they are all humans, so according to you there have been dozens of human species in our history and we have endured extreme evolution changes within 6000 years? Edited February 4 by Goly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 46 minutes ago, chartpolski said: Lucy , Austrolalopithecus Afarensis. Cheers. Lucy was an an ape charts nothing more 1 hour ago, Goly said: The creationists lose all their logic when they try and manoeuvre around posing questions. I mean how can they explain archaic humans that have been around for millions of years? And more recent humans like the Neanderthal, still around half a million years old. Ffs are you having a laugh,evolutionists can't get past the first hurdle lol Were did all the matter come from that exploded in the big bang lol oh that's right,nothing exploded, You can't even answer that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 24 minutes ago, Goly said: Yes, they were humans, but they definitely weren't homosapiens, neither were denisovans, erectus, etc. Have you seen the morphological differences, let alone genetic. You claim they are all humans, so according to you there have been dozens of human species in our history and we have endured extreme evolution changes within 6000 years? So what does this prove exactly that neanderthals were bigger an stronger? What's the differences here goly? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WataWalloper 3,573 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 Don’t we still get Pygmy’s an stuff, they still human but nowt like us, be liek comparing us to one them denisovians Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WataWalloper 3,573 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 if folk dug up them 3 bodies from years back they would swear they wasn’t the same Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 Just now, WataWalloper said: Don’t we still get Pygmy’s an stuff, they still human but nowt like us, be liek comparing us to one them denisovians Lol exactly Don,variations of size in humans prove feck all Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 2 minutes ago, Francie, said: Lucy was an an ape charts nothing more Ffs are you having a laugh,evolutionists can't get past the first hurdle lol Were did all the matter come from that exploded in the big bang lol oh that's right,nothing exploded, You can't even answer that. Goalpost moving again mate? Lol Do you suggest that dozens of humans lived on earth at some point and all but us survived, all within the space of 6000 years? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WataWalloper 3,573 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 Just now, Goly said: Goalpost moving again mate? Lol Do you suggest that dozens of humans lived on earth at some point and all but us survived, all within the space of 6000 years? Why not, if we was the most numerous to start with. -‘ more clever maybe they didn’t die out as such but were absorbed into what we become Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 Just now, Goly said: Goalpost moving again mate? Lol Do you suggest that dozens of humans lived on earth at some point and all but us survived, all within the space of 6000 years? Dozens of humans? You mean different size humans from different lands ffs that's all it is. Look around the world today,you get bug people small people tiny people etc There all people your different species proves f**k all lol its just different humans from different lands like today Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 So take dons example the pygmy,say one of them an michael Jordan were buried together an found years later,what would your scients say lol There all humans just different sizes an bone density,just like we see around the world today Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WataWalloper 3,573 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 Compare a chink or a jap to a big ole Scandinavian an yous think they from diff planets haha 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 6 minutes ago, WataWalloper said: Why not, if we was the most numerous to start with. -‘ more clever maybe they didn’t die out as such but were absorbed into what we become That did happen, but all this happened within 6000 years according to Francie and the Bible doesn't mention any other human cousins, Adam & Eve were Homosapien. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 4 minutes ago, WataWalloper said: Compare a chink or a jap to a big ole Scandinavian an yous think they from diff planets haha Not if you looked at their skeletons, the same with pygmies, they also have homosapien like skeletons, neanderthals show much more differences anatomically, and that's before we even move on to genetics. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 1 minute ago, Goly said: Not if you looked at their skeletons, the same with pygmies, they also have homosapien like skeletons, neanderthals show much more differences anatomically, and that's before we even move on to genetics. What kind of differences? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.