BenjaminCadd 109 Posted April 21, 2013 Report Share Posted April 21, 2013 I am looking for a new scope, for around £150 to go onto the HW97k. So far i am thinking the: Hawke Varmint SF MTC Viper MTC Mamba light Will be used for vermin around 25 - 45 yrds, IR not really important. Many thanks. Quote Link to post
PaulEamonn 37 Posted April 21, 2013 Report Share Posted April 21, 2013 I've got the Varmint. I like it because it has a thicker reticle than other scopes I've used. This fact is useful because it not only helps my old eyes but it's much easier to see the mildots and half mildots at night when I'm using my NV. I was out plinking with it on my HW100 yesterday at out to 60 yards on 10 mag. Some people may find that the mildots cover too much of the target but they didn't seem to stop me getting reasonable groups. I also find the side parallax wheel invaluable - especially when I've got the NV add on attached. It makes adjusting the focus so much easier. Quote Link to post
Skot Ruthless Teale 1,701 Posted April 21, 2013 Report Share Posted April 21, 2013 mamba lite mate had one on my hw97k or stretch budget a bit and get a panorama SKoT Quote Link to post
BenjaminCadd 109 Posted April 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2013 I have looked at the panorama as well, are these really that good? would you rate it more than the mtc scopes, im looking for a 44mm at max so the 40mmm panorama is in the price bracket! Atb Quote Link to post
Skot Ruthless Teale 1,701 Posted April 21, 2013 Report Share Posted April 21, 2013 some prefer mtc some hawke.. me, im undecided lol both do as goood a job as eachother for a similar price. what i will say tho is the panorama seems to have a very good field of view. i was out shooting abd bumped into a fella with a bsa ultra, i had a few shots and asked him how big the scope was he said 50 mm.. it was near enough fully dark like but i could see a hell of a lot more through my 50mm panorama than his, whatever it was. both scopes were on 10x mag, maybe a bit extreme in the dark but a target about 30 yards away was only just visible through his and i could see it a hell of a lot clearer with my panorama. when i had my mamba lite on my 97kt it was just as good as the panorama (50) i have on at the min. arguably the 40mm panorama would be better if seated closer to the action, for an even flatter trajectory!! SKoT Quote Link to post
stealthy1 3,964 Posted April 21, 2013 Report Share Posted April 21, 2013 Get a look through all of your choices, for me it comes down to reticule, I like thin lines on a mildot Quote Link to post
Skot Ruthless Teale 1,701 Posted April 21, 2013 Report Share Posted April 21, 2013 as stealthy just said. i also prefer the very fine ret on my panoramas plus the IR , although not a massive deal, does help when shooting in low light. the scb ret on my mamba lite is a bit thicker but some people prefer thick lines on their ret. some say the 'christmas tree' type rets are obstructive, but i disagree.. and they have more aimpoints so better for shooting at different ranges and in wind. if you just want to shoot at 1 range buy a scope with a good old 30/30 lol Quote Link to post
splitcane 5 Posted April 22, 2013 Report Share Posted April 22, 2013 Don't forget second hand. You'll get a better sight for the money, and anyway, it's always good to avoid paying the Revenue its 20%. Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.