Jump to content

DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    716

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]

  1. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Under Article 6[d] the above names will be called to give evidence in my court case if the information that I have requested is not released. November 2007
  2. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    August 2007 October 2007
  3. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Temple Quay, BRISTOL BS1 6EB t 0117 372 8831 f 0117 372 8206 m 07817 164704 e xxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx.xxx.xx Investigations Unit RSPB The Lodge Sandy Bedfordshire SG19 2DL Date: 17 04 2007 Dear DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 As you may be aware, from 1st April 2007, the functions of the Wildlife Licensing and Registration Service (WLRS) have been transferred to the new Animal Health Agency (formally the State Veterinary Service) which is an executive agency of Defra. This move affected the CITES Licensing and Bird Registratio
  4. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    ‘ALL NICE DRESSED UP OF COURSE!’ What does that mean?
  5. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    ‘Co-operation’ does that include not raiding Mark Robb when the DoE tell him they will help him? The RSPB have manipulated the law so much that the burden of legislation on people who keep birds IS IMPOSSIBLE to keep in front of, moreover the DoE have been illegally deceiving Mark Robb and everyone who has registered their hybrids, as hybrids do not need to be registered. Without this deceiving then there would have been no problem with the paper work. I would be delighted to send the evidence on the 28 years of deception.
  6. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Was the big mess due to Shorrock, if not then who? Why is Mark Britton still ‘doing odds and sods’ on the 22 February 2007 for Shorrock after the hidden agenda was known and what was he doing? Why is McWilliams sorry for Mark Robb but on the other hand he is making a joke of Mark Robb being upset? Please supply all the information on the joke and why McWilliams feels Mark Robb has been badly treated. February 2007 April 2007
  7. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Why is Shorrock allowed to see Mark Robb’s files if he was not instructed by the police?
  8. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    The blacked out information must be released or a will have to call Roy Pitt, John Hounslow, Mark Britton, PC Flickling and so on to give evidence at my courts case in September 2009.
  9. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Shorrock looked at Mark Robb’s Private papers with a ‘fine tooth comb’ The blacked out information must be released or a will have to call Roy Pitt, John Hounslow, Mark Britton, PC Flickling and so on to give evidence at my courts case in September 2009.
  10. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Why is Shorrock in control when he has a hidden agenda and why on the 7 February 2007 after what Roy Pitt said on the 2 February 2007; Shorrock should not get any more information, does Roy Pitt pass on more information to Shorrock, especially after the DNA evidence had proved Mark Robb bred his birds? What files does Shorrock have that he is checking at the offices that cover Mark Robb?
  11. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Why is Shorrock STILL in control when he has a known hidden agenda and why on the 7 February 2007 after what Roy Pitt said on the 2 February 2007; Shorrock should not get any more information does Mark Britton pass on more information to Shorrock, especially after the DNA evidence had proved that Mark Robb bred his birds? Is this the last email from Defra to Shorrock to give him third party information if so why?
  12. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    In the words of Shorrock ‘WILL HAVE TO PULL MOST OF THE INTERVIEW PLAN TOGETHER’. Shorrock is trying to put his hidden agenda forward again and take over the interviewing of Mark Robb.
  13. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Where is the information in relation to John Richardson contacting Defra, please disclose the information? Shorrock’s words ‘I do not want this to go to waste’ shows that he is determined to convict Mark Robb otherwise it will be a waste. That is not a reason to convict someone, so time will not have been wasted. In other words Shorrock is trying to justify his position and what he has done and wants to do
  14. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Why is Shorrock allowed to be in control when it is known that he has a hidden agenda and why on the 7 February 2007 after what Roy Pitt said on the 2 February 2007; Shorrock NOT be allowed to receive any more information does Shorrock secure more information? Why does Roy Pitt pass on more information to Shorrock, especially after the DNA evidence had proved Mark Robb bred his birds?
  15. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    What situation has occurred in North Yorkshire Police in relation to the case in question that Roy Pitt on the 2 February 2007 should say that information should only be released to Shorrock if the police requested it? Have Animal Health been deceived by Shorrock into releasing information to further his hidden agenda without the police knowing? It would have been more prudent not to have allowed Shorrock to have stamped his hidden agenda on the investigation in the first place and it is unacceptable to allow Shorrock to continue in my case or any one elses. From Shorrock’s email dated
  16. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Roy Pitt given that PC Lee Flinckling told you the police only requested information on Mark Robb’s Article 10s would you like rethink your answer in the above letter as Shorrock was allowed to go on a ‘fishing trip’ through Mark Robb’s personal papers on his hidden agenda to close Mark Robb down because he breeds birds? February 2007
  17. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    It should be noted that Mark Robb had not seen me [John Dodsworth] for over 10 years before BOTH raids. Contact was only made with me [John Dodsworth] by Derek Canning going to Newcastle Crown Court in October 2008 therefore how does the officer believe that he can prove a connection between Mark Robb and me in relation to supplying illegal birds? This would have been legally needed to secure the search warrants. It is my contention that the officer has been lied to. It seems strange that PC Lee Flickling in his email dated 28 January 2007 is concerned that the police cannot proven if t
  18. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    By the 24 January 2007 the DNA evidence showed Mark Robb had bred his birds. The above email to PC Lee Flickling from Roy Pitt is dated 25 January 2007 which is after the DNA evidence was known so why is Guy Shorrock still harassing Mark Robb and allowed to continue his hidden agenda? The reasons why Roy Pitt is questioning the role of Shorrock needs to be investigated by the police. Mark Robb was told by the DoE that he would be given time to sort out the technical paper work offences therefore there was no need to ‘raid’ Mark Robb’s home or John Dodsworth’s. The police had the pow
  19. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    Above is a document used by Mark Britton to sign out Mark Robb’s personal documents to Guy Shorrock on the 10 January 2007. The questions is when was the DNA evidence available in relation to proving Mark Robb bred his birds and why was Shorrock, who is just a member of the public, allowed to sign out personal data unsupervised when there was a hidden agenda to target bird breeder by Shorrock as he does not like people who breed birds and wants to close them down?
  20. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    As the DNA evidence has shown by the 24 January 2007 that Mark Robb has bred all of his birds why is Guy Shorrock still requesting information from Animal Health on the 24 January 2007 and how is he allowed to come to Animal Health and take away personal files on Mark Robb unsupervised when the police had only asked for the Article 10s?
  21. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    next email
  22. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    No, the DNA evidence has not come back negative, it has come back positive by 24 January 2007 as it proves Mark Robb bred his birds in question. At this point Mark Robb should not have been persecuted further moreover given the fact the whole matter has been a ‘waste of everyone times’ where did the original bogus information come from to get the two search warrants? It is my contention that the search warrants were secured by perjury and I want the evidence used to secure the search warrant supplied to me before my court case in September 2009. I have Mark Robb’s full permission to h
  23. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    email 5 January 2007
  24. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
    email 4 Why black out information if you have nothing to hide? Who has a full list and is it ‘Guy’ if so why does he have the list and not the police?
  25. DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]
×
×
  • Create New...