losing the battle

[Guest jbswildlife]

just read a article in the countrymans weekly, by Simon Hart of the Countryside Alliance. two old long timers both over 70, being convicted of coarsing hare's. the RsPCA attended the dog trial and even was given tea whilst all the time gather evidence to take these well established doggy men to court. but it seams to me they are clutching at straws because to use 15 grand of taxpayers money and only recoup 4 grand from a guilty verdict indicates that the law makers are not interested in continuing with the ban. why else would the RsPCA go to the lenghts to prosecute the elderly at an expense to others, :oops: they are using what in every other case would be classed as an out rage to drag this into the public eye and drum up support to protest against a future ban lift. Well I think they will fail and have already because it is being noticed that they are not in support of animal care but would rather try bulling their way into being a association to the goverment than doing the animal charity work that they are men't to be doing.

[riohog 5,917]

just read a article in the countrymans weekly, by Simon Hart of the Countryside Alliance. two old long timers both over 70, being convicted of coarsing hare's. the RsPCA attended the dog trial and even was given tea whilst all the time gather evidence to take these well established doggy men to court. but it seams to me they are clutching at straws because to use 15 grand of taxpayers money and only recoup 4 grand from a guilty verdict indicates that the law makers are not interested in continuing with the ban. why else would the RsPCA go to the lenghts to prosecute the elderly at an expense to others, :oops: they are using what in every other case would be classed as an out rage to drag this into the public eye and drum up support to protest against a future ban lift. Well I think they will fail and have already because it is being noticed that they are not in support of animal care but would rather try bulling their way into being a association to the goverment than doing the animal charity work that they are men't to be doing.

 

i quite agree im sure the public are begining to se them for what they really are im surepeople dont want to se their donations being used for this kind of thing

[Guest miller1989]

they are using what in every other case would be classed as an out rage to drag this into the public eye and drum up support to protest against a future ban lift. Well I think they will fail and have already because it is being noticed that they are not in support of animal care but would rather try bulling their way into being a association to the goverment than doing the animal charity work that they are men't to be doing.

 

 

apsalutely right,a waste of time they are

[Kay 3,709]

If there using these types of tactics to gain public support they must be very worried about things , i honestly think joe public has better things to think about & the only real support they have is from extremists , aggitators the likes of who dug up the body of Gladys Hammond , if thats all they have to support them

[Geoff.C 0]

If there using these types of tactics to gain public support they must be very worried about things , i honestly think joe public has better things to think about & the only real support they have is from extremists , aggitators the likes of who dug up the body of Gladys Hammond , if thats all they have to support them

 

Well put Kay. There is still RSPCA staff who work largely in the background, they are interested only in real world animal welfare. They go quietly about their work rescuing animals from bad situations, and doing a good job. Sadly, the upper echelons are totally infiltrated by political type extremists who are only interested in spoiling people's legal sports. If only the "dear old ladies" who leave huge bequests to the RSPCA, could see what the money gets wasted on, I am sure a large part of their funding would dry up. I haven't given a penny since (about 10 years ago) they allegedly spent £75K on the "pile of dead dogs" shock horror photo campaign, launched at Crufts. Many folks in the dog fancy also dropped them at that time.

[Guest allroundhunter]

I have hered also that bbc have dropped crufts for next year and wont be televising it this next year due to the report from panarama so much for k.c eh serves them right.I just feel sorry for the dogs.

[Kay 3,709]

If there using these types of tactics to gain public support they must be very worried about things , i honestly think joe public has better things to think about & the only real support they have is from extremists , aggitators the likes of who dug up the body of Gladys Hammond , if thats all they have to support them

 

Well put Kay. There is still RSPCA staff who work largely in the background, they are interested only in real world animal welfare. They go quietly about their work rescuing animals from bad situations, and doing a good job. Sadly, the upper echelons are totally infiltrated by political type extremists who are only interested in spoiling people's legal sports. If only the "dear old ladies" who leave huge bequests to the RSPCA, could see what the money gets wasted on, I am sure a large part of their funding would dry up. I haven't given a penny since (about 10 years ago) they allegedly spent £75K on the "pile of dead dogs" shock horror photo campaign, launched at Crufts. Many folks in the dog fancy also dropped them at that time.

 

Its no supprise they very carefully select what '' pending court cases'' they make publically known, you rarely hear about the real cruelty cases, the animal collectors who surround themselves with multi species & them neglect them

 

But they seem to great delight in taking well looked after dogs, there as bad as the abusers & the nutters who skulk round making peoples lives a misery with the extreme activaties,

[Guest allroundhunter]

just read a article in the countrymans weekly, by Simon Hart of the Countryside Alliance. two old long timers both over 70, being convicted of coarsing hare's. the RsPCA attended the dog trial and even was given tea whilst all the time gather evidence to take these well established doggy men to court. but it seams to me they are clutching at straws because to use 15 grand of taxpayers money and only recoup 4 grand from a guilty verdict indicates that the law makers are not interested in continuing with the ban. why else would the RsPCA go to the lenghts to prosecute the elderly at an expense to others, :oops: they are using what in every other case would be classed as an out rage to drag this into the public eye and drum up support to protest against a future ban lift. Well I think they will fail and have already because it is being noticed that they are not in support of animal care but would rather try bulling their way into being a association to the goverment than doing the animal charity work that they are men't to be doing.

 

This is what it said mate here

 

Instead of a fine he issued MR.**** and Miss ***** with a conditional discharge which is judicial shorthand for a mild ticking off . and whilst the RSPCA tried to recoup THE £15.000 "sorry couldnt help myself then" of there members money they had spent in bringing the prosecution,he ordered that just £2,000 should be paid OF ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN "THIS FARCE" THE RSPCA HAS THE MOST QUESTIONS TO ANSWER SUPRISE SUPRISE Me for one will never give up my hunting no matter what its my way of life and hope to bring on my son with it one day keep on hunting gang all the best allround hunter.

[Guest jbswildlife]

planning on buying a whippet summer 2009 the ban has been a big stopper in me getting one in the past, my terrier is working the bush and field now so going to get one and it will be allowed to chase and kill so hopefully the ban will be a thing of the past.

[riohog 5,917]

planning on buying a whippet summer 2009 the ban has been a big stopper in me getting one in the past, my terrier is working the bush and field now so going to get one and it will be allowed to chase and kill so hopefully the ban will be a thing of the past.

 

 

if its chasing bunnies theres no proplem quite legal

[Guest jbswildlife]

planning on buying a whippet summer 2009 the ban has been a big stopper in me getting one in the past, my terrier is working the bush and field now so going to get one and it will be allowed to chase and kill so hopefully the ban will be a thing of the past.

 

 

if its chasing bunnies theres no proplem quite legal

 

had the coarsing bug when I was young and would love to start it up again

[Guest jbswildlife]

planning on buying a whippet summer 2009 the ban has been a big stopper in me getting one in the past, my terrier is working the bush and field now so going to get one and it will be allowed to chase and kill so hopefully the ban will be a thing of the past.

 

 

if its chasing bunnies theres no proplem quite legal

 

had the coarsing bug when I was young and would love to start it up again

[riohog 5,917]

planning on buying a whippet summer 2009 the ban has been a big stopper in me getting one in the past, my terrier is working the bush and field now so going to get one and it will be allowed to chase and kill so hopefully the ban will be a thing of the past.

 

 

if its chasing bunnies theres no proplem quite legal

 

had the coarsing bug when I was young and would love to start it up again

 

 

so do /would i be careful!

[Guest MY LAW]

country is fecked ,cant ever see anything changing back ,so do as i do ,make the most of whats left .and enjoy .but do your best to keep it as leagal as you can

[Guest WILF]

i quite agree im sure the public are begining to se them for what they really are im surepeople dont want to se their donations being used for this kind of thing

 

Are you sure about that?...........I was at a place the other day and a room of over 100 people were doing nothing but process crate loads of donation cheques to one of the well known "wildlife" organisations!!!

 

 

And I mean crate loads