Jump to content

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Bangersanmash said:

Cheeky c**t lol. There's lenses out there its just its a no brainer that your not guna spending more on a lense than the main body of the camera is worth.  

Again, there's not for this mount, you do know that cameras have different mounts, it's the connection from the camera to lens. It's well known that the lenses are more expensive than the bodies, some lenses are 10K plus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pardus said:

Again, there's not for this mount, you do know that cameras have different mounts, it's the connection from the camera to lens. It's well known that the lenses are more expensive than the bodies, some lenses are 10K plus.

That one there is 11k lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Bangersanmash said:

Screenshot_20250329_181149_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Screenshot_20250329_181131_Amazon Shopping.jpg

That's a starter lens, it's not that great as it's not really a fast lens, my camera is worth more than this lens, you can spend from that price to tens of thousands on a lens, my camera has all the bells and whistles, partnered with a good lens it can take great images of wildlife and birds in flight.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Bangersanmash said:

Plenty just pricey lol A might look stupid but im not fella. Your passing it on because you've done your homework on price of lenses. 🤣🤣🤣. There's a few lenses just pricey. That's what you pay for the lenses. 

Screenshot_20250329_182823_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20250329_182756_Chrome.jpg

You're posting lenses and most of them are next to useless for wildlife and birds, you're needing lenses 300mm and above to really be of any use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep um f**k that 11k for a lense. Unless someone grafted one an came and seen me wanting a quick few quid . My pal has an underwater drone that should have been 5 grand FiFish. It's who you know 😉🤣. Get a grafter to drop on you a decent camera. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pardus said:

You're posting lenses and most of them are next to useless for wildlife and birds, you're needing lenses 300mm and above to really be of any use.

There's 4 lenses there 100 _ 300 mm but the prices are through the roof mate. It's a no brainer. That you won't go out and spending 11k not even 5k a bet on a lense. Canon is at the top for photography. Just its for professional photographers that are making decent money to pull it back in. Unless your a rich c**t that it won't touch your pocket. Like a roofer lol. You made me laugh with that. 🤣🤣

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bangersanmash said:

There's 4 lenses there 100 _ 300 mm but the prices are through the roof mate. It's a no brainer. That you won't go out and spending 11k not even 5k a bet on a lense. Canon is at the top for photography. Just its for professional photographers that are making decent money to pull it back in. Unless your a rich c**t that it won't touch your pocket. Like a roofer lol. You made me laugh with that. 🤣🤣

100-300 is basically not much use, you need more reach than that. Canon is no better than Sony or Nikon really, they are just more awkward with their lenses and are worse for third party compatibility. I'll go a grand at most for a lens, that's why I'd be better with Sony or Nikon because there's the Sigma 150-600, plenty of reach there.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Pardus said:

100-300 is basically not much use, you need more reach than that. Canon is no better than Sony or Nikon really, they are just more awkward with their lenses and are worse for third party compatibility. I'll go a grand at most for a lens, that's why I'd be better with Sony or Nikon because there's the Sigma 150-600, plenty of reach there.

Nikon is good. A chap near me twitcher said Nikon's a good camera. But same again lenses will be same expensive. He's proper into it with his misses. Was taking images of reed buntings down near local shit works on edge of the grounds. Plus chiffchaffs. He says these might be the ones that wintered here. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Bangersanmash said:

Nikon is good. A chap near me twitcher said Nikon's a good camera. But same again lenses will be same expensive. He's proper into it with his misses. Was taking images of reed buntings down near local shit works on edge of the grounds. Plus chiffchaffs. He says these might be the ones that wintered here. 

They are basically all as good as each other, but again, Sony has the most lens choices followed by Nikon. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Pardus said:

They are basically all as good as each other, but again, Sony has the most lens choices followed by Nikon. 

AMATEURPHOTOGRAPHER.COM

Extremely well featured for both stills and video, the Panasonic Lumix S5II is a great buy for content creators...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Bangersanmash said:
AMATEURPHOTOGRAPHER.COM

Extremely well featured for both stills and video, the Panasonic Lumix S5II is a great buy for content creators...

 

Don't think Panasonic are up there with those three brands, their autofocus isn't in their league.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...