charlotte hill 0 Posted February 11, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2007 justwaitonefookin minute there pal........who'r you callin' a fookin oxymoron?? eh? eh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mavphill 0 Posted February 11, 2007 Report Share Posted February 11, 2007 gnashers gone quiet? I was looking forward to his reply about the car accident? then again.. if we all thought like him we wouldn't need prisons, police, courts, solicitors ... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dale Posted February 11, 2007 Report Share Posted February 11, 2007 gnashers gone quiet? I was looking forward to his reply about the car accident? then again.. if we all thought like him we wouldn't need prisons, police, courts, solicitors ... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest game'dogs Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 The word thats been touted about in this thread morphed from the people who lived a certain lifestyle and yet chose to inform the authorities of other folk partaking in that lifestyle in order to gain an advantage. By this rational a "straight Go'er" cannot possibly be a "Grass" and becomes something of an oxymoron when used in relation to the initial poster. Some cultures stretch this point more than others and striaght go'ers can be deemed to have "Grassed" where a financial advantage was acheived whilst being thinly vieled to have been done on moral grounds. Non of this applies here. thats the best post yet :thumbs-up: ime not to keen on folk who grass but to me a grass is someone who is living in the same world as the grassed on , and is only doing so for financial advantges or to try and deal themselfs out of a sticky wickit . oneredtrim you explained it a lot better than i did but to them who couldnt work it out explaine it again but in a more understandable way :thumbs-up: . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest oneredtrim Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 (edited) . Edited January 16, 2008 by oneredtrim Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 31,602 Posted February 13, 2007 Report Share Posted February 13, 2007 (edited) . Edited August 7 by gnasher16 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Foxgun Tom 75 Posted February 13, 2007 Report Share Posted February 13, 2007 Charlotte!! you tried to help a dog in distress therefore thats a point we'd all act on the organisation you contacted are a waste of space and in my book should be closed down as they destroy more healthy dogs they can re-home elsewhere?? you made a deciscion based strictly on the welfare issue re: the dog, for that you should be commended Find a Lurcher rescue like LB's and donate your £5 pounds a month to that Good luck Tom Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mooster 1 Posted February 13, 2007 Report Share Posted February 13, 2007 I say this whole debate revolves around the word "grass" which you used at the start Charlotte. It's an imotive word same as snitch or informant- telling tales. All well and good slagging such people off until it's your kid being bullied at school then nobody will say who'se responsible through fear of being a grass.That can't be right. Old people beaten in care homes,a kid knocked over hit and run, etc etc.God help us if our society adopts the warped idea that its not worth saying anything cos it's already happened!!! You did right...you stood up for something which had no voice Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.