Poland having referendum on eu membership

[mC HULL 15,487]

36 minutes ago, sandymere said:

We know that CO₂ warms the world, that CO₂ concentrations are at record-breaking levels, and that global temperatures are rising. But how do we know for certain that humans are the cause?

The answer is in the science. The CO₂ produced from fossil fuels carries a unique signature that differentiates it from CO₂ produced from other sources. In brief, it carries a specific ratio of carbon isotopes that is only found in the atmosphere when coal, oil, or gas is burned.

Scientists call this δ¹³C (pronounced "delta C thirteen"), and it’s a smoking gun. Since the 1880s, δ¹³C has changed in a way that could only happen if CO₂ was increasingly coming from fossil fuel sources.

This information tells scientists that human-caused fossil fuel emissions have been the main contributor to the rise in CO₂ concentrations since the pre-industrial era.

 

From

Are Humans the Major Cause of Global Warming?

WWW.UCSUSA.ORG

---

A straightforward explanation of how we know that humans cause global warming, using charts, graphs, and plain language.

 

your more gullible then my 7 year old 

[mC HULL 15,487]

27 minutes ago, Greyman said:

And natural forest fires, volcanos etc are easily differentiated, we are getting very good at manipulating figures to suit our agenda but one or two are a little slow at spotting it, we have changed the way we record weather patterns to deliberately change the outcomes that’s why we are being told this year is warmer than 1976 now I know that it ain’t anywhere near but the blind and the gullible can’t quite think back that long  but it’s not true and no amount of charts graphs or memes can change the truth only an idiots perception 

so they say temperatures are rising and it’s deadly lol 

so the year 76 was hot but 2023 was one degrees hotter 

what about the 47 years inbetween surely if temperature were rising it would be hotter every year since 76 not take 47 years for  one year were june was hotter ffs people are really dim 

@sandymere what’s your take on it 

Edited July 4, 2023 by mC HULL

[mC HULL 15,487]

and our co2 levels can’t go much lower or plant life would die we’re at 400ppm plant life dies around 150ppm it thrives at around 1500 ppm 

 

for the thick amongst us more co2 equals more vegetation 

[Lenmcharristar 10,231]

3 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

so they say temperatures are rising and it’s deadly lol 

so the year 76 was hot but 2023 was one degrees hotter 

what about the 47 years inbetween surely if temperature were rising it would be hotter every year since 76 not take 47 years for  one year were june was hotter ffs people are really dim 

@sandymere what’s your take on it 

Exactly and by there being more food for flora then there should be more off them, also more of those that eat them, us as in 8 billion now, shows its doing well until it reaches the tipping point where one cant sustain the other, also burning dry dead vegetation is great for soil as it stabilises its minerals therefor growing fare more nutritional vegetables etc. how many people use ash in their flower beds these days? 

[mC HULL 15,487]

2 minutes ago, Lenmcharristar said:

Exactly and by there being more food for flora then there should be more off them, also more of those that eat them, us as in 8 billion now, shows its doing well until it reaches the tipping point where one cant sustain the other, also burning dry dead vegetation is great for soil as it stabilises its minerals therefor growing fare more nutritional vegetables etc. how many people use ash in their flower beds these days? 

your spot on and not many use ash now 

co2 is carbon the foundation of all life and oxygen which everything needs to live just about and sandy thinks it’s bad ffs lol

[Francie, 2,735]

1 minute ago, mC HULL said:

so they say temperatures are rising and it’s deadly lol 

so the year 76 was hot but 2023 was one degrees hotter 

what about the 47 years inbetween surely if temperature were rising it would be hotter every year since 76 not take 47 years for  one year were june was hotter ffs people are really dim 

@sandymere what’s your take on it 

Climate change zealots are hard work mc lol

Of course all the people thats shouting the loudest about it are the ones pollouting the earth the most like king charles,how many times a year does he fly private jet? One flight in a private jet put outs a years worth or more of burning diesel car,how many private jets an entourage vehicle flew into davos for the climate change meet,complete an utter hypocrite tosspots

[mC HULL 15,487]

1 minute ago, Francie, said:

Climate change zealots are hard work mc lol

Of course all the people thats shouting the loudest about it are the ones pollouting the earth the most like king charles,how many times a year does he fly private jet? One flight in a private jet put outs a years worth or more of burning diesel car,how many private jets an entourage vehicle flew into davos for the climate change meet,complete an utter hypocrite tosspots

it’s the same as covid and them not distancing partying 

then as you say flying planes to davos 

they know what they are telling us is dogshit it’s just shit they spout for gullible idiots to believe 

all to stop our freedoms 

and daft sheep believe it and spout it left right and center because there brain is programmed to follow not think 

[Greyman 31,042]

There’s a pattern emerging  here sandy and a few others will just swallow everything there told because they clearly think those on the  rung above them actually want to help bring them up to there level while they have one foot on there head and the other on there fingers, sadly predators have always needed weak prey to survive now they seem to be breeding them to order 

[Francie, 2,735]

14 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

your spot on and not many use ash now 

co2 is carbon the foundation of all life and oxygen which everything needs to live just about and sandy thinks it’s bad ffs lol

They dont want more plant life or more forests,that equals more food an oxygen for us,a big no no,why do you think there spraying our skies with chemical aerosol trails the past twenty years trying to block out the sun the life giver of everything,no sun no photosynthesis equals no plants or trees theres a pattern forming here an the supposed smartest of us cant see it.

[mackem 29,519]

26 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

more co2 equals more vegetation 

I am all for that,count me in,I used to use Co2 dispensers.

[mC HULL 15,487]

3 minutes ago, mackem said:

I am all for that,count me in,I used to use Co2 dispensers.

treble the co2 and they love it greenhouses love it don’t they 

[Greyman 31,042]

3 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

treble the co2 and they love it greenhouses love it don’t they 

If it’s such a problem you would think they would be giving it away, been buying these for years

[sandymere 8,263]

1 hour ago, mC HULL said:

so they say temperatures are rising and it’s deadly lol 

so the year 76 was hot but 2023 was one degrees hotter 

what about the 47 years inbetween surely if temperature were rising it would be hotter every year since 76 not take 47 years for  one year were june was hotter ffs people are really dim 

@sandymere what’s your take on it 

My take is pretty simple, its a process not a straight line, that's like comparing weather with climate, its a little more complex than that.

the link I posted above explains it in everyday terms.

1 hour ago, mC HULL said:

and our co2 levels can’t go much lower or plant life would die we’re at 400ppm plant life dies around 150ppm it thrives at around 1500 ppm 

 

for the thick amongst us more co2 equals more vegetation 

As with most things in life, "its not as simple as that".

As with the article above this explains a very complex subject in everyday terms but also links to a bit of research to back it up.

More CO2 in the atmosphere hurts key plants and crops more than it helps » Yale Climate Connections

YALECLIMATECONNECTIONS.ORG

---

The familiar adage - too much of a good thing is a bad thing - applies to atmospheric carbon dioxide: In higher concentrations, it is a damaging pollutant.

 

[mC HULL 15,487]

16 minutes ago, sandymere said:

My take is pretty simple, its a process not a straight line, that's like comparing weather with climate, its a little more complex than that.

the link I posted above explains it in everyday terms.

As with most things in life, "its not as simple as that".

As with the article above this explains a very complex subject in everyday terms but also links to a bit of research to back it up.

More CO2 in the atmosphere hurts key plants and crops more than it helps » Yale Climate Connections

YALECLIMATECONNECTIONS.ORG

---

The familiar adage - too much of a good thing is a bad thing - applies to atmospheric carbon dioxide: In higher concentrations, it is a damaging pollutant.

 

what do you read such shite for sandy ?? 

if we made it 45percent more it was around 200 ppm nearly at the point plants can’t survive and is most likely the reason we have better food and health today 

and who thinks of  as co2 as a fertiliser ffs 

the full article is dog shit mate comical lol

first time in ages i’ve read out you put up and it’s reminded me why i don’t bother 

Edited July 4, 2023 by mC HULL

[Greyman 31,042]