Police officer shot dead.

[bell 3,503]

27 minutes ago, SINDASOX said:

He was handcuffed with his hands behind his back, how the f**k did he manage to shoot the cop.

SINDASOX

Mmm....what’s the betting he wasn’t cuffed at the custody desk ?.....

[Ken's Deputy 4,456]

Here we go! The Times has now quoted a source as saying he is a " British Citizen ". Is Autistic. And was spouting " Islamist and ‘extreme right-wing’ views. "

Next, they'll be telling us he was seen leaving a mosque, chanting " Ohhhh Tommy, Tommy!!! " For fukks fukking sake!

 

[SINDASOX 255]

News report says he shot him 5 times, then shot his self whilst in handcuffs behind his back.

Don't add up to me.

SINDASOX

[Ken's Deputy 4,456]

Sindasox; Reportedly had a revolver. That ties in.

Who said he was cuffed behind? Be some pretty sweet, James Bond stuff to do all that from behind his back. Gun in his front waistband though? Relatively fukking easy. Put your hands together and try.

 

[MH1 1,800]

2 hours ago, Ken's Deputy said:

Here we go! The Times has now quoted a source as saying he is a " British Citizen ". Is Autistic. And was spouting " Islamist and ‘extreme right-wing’ views. "

Next, they'll be telling us he was seen leaving a mosque, chanting " Ohhhh Tommy, Tommy!!! " For fukks fukking sake!

 

I read he was Sri Lankan 

[Ken's Deputy 4,456]

MH1; Exactly my point

[ArchieHood 3,692]

2 hours ago, Ken's Deputy said:

Sindasox; Reportedly had a revolver. That ties in.

Who said he was cuffed behind? Be some pretty sweet, James Bond stuff to do all that from behind his back. Gun in his front waistband though? Relatively fukking easy. Put your hands together and try.

 

Subjected to a stop and search, drugs and ammunition found but not a revolver in his waistband?......wakey wakey.

[Ken's Deputy 4,456]

What are you suggesting, Archie?

 

[Qbgrey 3,968]

Drugs are taking over the minds,and actions of the youth.not going to end well.

[ArchieHood 3,692]

14 minutes ago, Ken's Deputy said:

What are you suggesting, Archie?

 

Small revolver in his underwear which wouldn't be found during a standard search, he apparently shot himself in the neck which would suggest his hands were in front , so maybe he has, if nimble enough managed to  slip his cuffed hands under his feet and pulled the gun out.There have been several differant accounts so far , he was in a cell, he was sat in the custody suite, CCTV will show what really happened.

[Ken's Deputy 4,456]

Archie; Yep. All extremely plausible.

.22, even a .38 revolver can be ridiculously small and light. And, yes, the old 'Legs through the loop' trick? Left in a cell? Absolutely.

I'd just like to clear up - purely for the sake of  mental exercise; I'm guessing the British Police now use these cuffs that have the interlaced joint? (I'm guessing the reader will know what I'm getting at) As opposed to the old chain joined ones.

If so / either way; Is it now standard procedure to cuff the suspect behind? If so, is it then standard procedure to leave said that way?

I'm trying to imagine the process between being brought in the back door and opening fire.

[TOMO 24,839]

7 hours ago, W. Katchum said:

Always saw them rigid cuffs put on the front, they got full control over you anyways once they in as one twist of the middle bit an it deck anybody.  Guy was obviously left unsupervised 

completely the opposite here ...I have seen dozens and dozens of lads handcuffed over the last few years....always those rigid things and always behind...and I don't think I can remember I single case where the arrested person was not crying out in pain ...or kicking up a fuss because they were uncomfortable ....

I just think they have took them off when down the station and processing him....

[Nicepix 5,650]

There are several ways of putting on handcuffs. For low risk prisoners they may be handcuffed at the front, but where there is any risk they should be placed to the rear either with hands back to back or the hands stacked one on top of the other. Putting them on an unwilling person properly isn't as easy as it might seem and they can cause a great deal of pain and even broken bones if too much force is applied by either party. Also, if the prisoner isn't compliant it might not be possible to adjust the bracelets to make sure they aren't too tight around the wrists.

 

[Greb147 6,808]

13 minutes ago, Nicepix said:

There are several ways of putting on handcuffs. For low risk prisoners they may be handcuffed at the front, but where there is any risk they should be placed to the rear either with hands back to back or the hands stacked one on top of the other. Putting them on an unwilling person properly isn't as easy as it might seem and they can cause a great deal of pain and even broken bones if too much force is applied by either party. Also, if the prisoner isn't compliant it might not be possible to adjust the bracelets to make sure they aren't too tight around the wrists.

 

You c**ts make sure they are all tight even if not resisting arrest.

[Greyman 25,151]

11 hours ago, Qbgrey said:

Drugs are taking over the minds,and actions of the youth.not going to end well.

That’s a real sweeping dad who’s never taken anything but larger statement there if ever I saw one,