White neighbours kneel down and beg there black neighbours for forgiveness.

[king 11,664]

Its warming up a bit now 

 

[green lurchers 16,368]

3 hours ago, king said:

 

On the left those carrying skinny lattes laptops with twitter accounts and spray cans who don’t work pay taxes and want everything for nothing     On the right those who work and pay taxes  and don’t want the monuments defaced. 

Edited June 13, 2020 by green lurchers

[jetro 5,349]

No messing about here

Atb j 

[jetro 5,349]

[jetro 5,349]

Yeah, them black boy had it tougher than any other race

Atb j 

[jetro 5,349]

PBP should study our History before condemning  galway people for the slavery  of black people in our past 
The Irish slave trade began when 30,000 Irish prisoners were sold as slaves to the New World. The King James I Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.

Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.

From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.

During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.

Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.

As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.

African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.

In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.

England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.

There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry. In 1839, Britain finally decided on its own to end its participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.

But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong.

Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories.

Don't know where these blm protester think they have the monopoly on this slavery issiue.

Atb j 

[jetro 5,349]

And my above post was, or isn't a shot at Britain, just in case some might think it is.

It's meant only to show that it's not the blacks that got it bad.

No offence ment towards any British people. 

History is history.

Atb j 

[green lurchers 16,368]

yazidi women lives matter but no mention of modern slavery from blm   Seems bit unfair tbh surely recent enslavement needs a word or two 

Edited June 13, 2020 by green lurchers

[green lurchers 16,368]

Bit sad to see   the lack of kneeling and no mention of the queens birthday from the blm gathering at trafalgar sq  maybe if the police done ther job last wk or two none of this counter protest would have happend 

[tandors 888]

Who were the predominant slave merchants, ship owners etc??

[jetro 5,349]

50 minutes ago, baker boy said:

Items like this should be on every social media outlet in the world, FB Twitter and whatever else is out there, there are millions of people who havent got a clue about stuff like this

It's not meant to highlight just the irish, I'm sure there was plenty of British put in the same situation 

Atb j 

[Ken's Deputy 4,456]

1 hour ago, jetro said:

PBP should study our History before condemning  galway people for the slavery  of black people in our past.
The Irish slave trade began when 30,000 Irish prisoners were sold as slaves to the New World .......

    This - The whole post. Now we need Macken to fly in a chartered helicopter, above London. Dropping thousands of print outs of That! See it fukcing kick off then!

 

[THE STIFFMEISTER 14,553]

5 hours ago, king said:

 

Nice headline for that video though eh ?? 

[foxdropper 17,092]

Only listen to picture Kelly Brocks tits while she’s talking .

[foxdropper 17,092]

How about circulating this ?

I write this as an Englishman about the current situation in his homeland - this is meant to be  thought provoking and is equally relevant in any other (once) White country.

I have been wondering about why Whites are called racists, and no other race is? 

There are British Africans, British Chinese, British Asian, British Turks, etc, etc, etc. 

And then there are just British. You know what I mean, plain old English people that were born here. You can include the Welsh, the Scottish and the people who live off our shores of Great Britain.

You say that Whites commit a lot of violence against you. So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live? 

You have the Muslim Council of Great Britain. 

You have Black History Month. 

You have swimming pools for Asian women. 

You have Islamic banks for Muslims only. 

You have year of the dragon day for Chinese people. 

If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists. 

If we had White History Month, we'd be racists. 

If we had any organization for only Whites to 'advance' OUR lives, we'd be racists. 

A White woman could not be in the Miss Black Britain or Miss Asia, but any colour can be in the Miss UK. 

If we had a college fund that only gave White students scholarships, you know we'd be racists.

There are over 200 openly proclaimed Muslim only schools in England. Yet if there were 'White schools only', that would be  racist!

In the Bradford riots and Toxteth riots, you believed that you were standing-up for your race and rights. If we stood-up for our race and rights, you would call us racists. 

You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists. 

We fly our flag, we are racists. If we celebrate St George's day we are racists. 

You can fly your flag and it’s called diversity. You celebrate your cultures and it’s called multiculturalism. 

You rob us, carjack us, and rape our daughters. But, when a White police officer arrests a black gang member or beats up an Asian drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist. 

I am proud.... but you call me a racist. 

Why is it that only Whites can be racists?? 

There is nothing improper about this e-mail. Let's see which of you are proud enough to send it on. 

I sadly don't think many will. That's why we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country. We won't stand up for ourselves! 

BEING PROUD TO BE WHITE! It's not a crime, YET... but its getting very close! 

I estimate that perhaps 5% of those reaching this point, will pass this message on!