Astanley 11,465 Posted December 4, 2018 Report Share Posted December 4, 2018 10 minutes ago, Phil Lloyd said: When an individual is 100% guilty,..proven beyond a doubt,..no chance of a miscarriage of justice, but 100 %, it was him, kinda thing...then,..he should be dispatched... As for the sensitive souls who say, "That's ok,.but would you be prepared to do it yourself"? I can only say,.yes,...easy peasy,...I've killed bigger animals,... it is not a problem,...one cruel b*****d, done and dusted, move on... When is someone 100% guilty though ? , Birmingham 6 Guilford 4 Renault 5 and numerous others means we can't trust the justice system 100% ,,so can we ever be sure ? 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Lloyd 10,736 Posted December 4, 2018 Report Share Posted December 4, 2018 True... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MickC 1,825 Posted December 5, 2018 Report Share Posted December 5, 2018 It should not have even been in the Parole Boards hands,he should have swung straight after his court case once he was found guilty ! 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Billy b 724 Posted December 5, 2018 Report Share Posted December 5, 2018 (edited) Just got no words.... id operate on this mothersc**t if I came across him how that family must feel knowing he's back out god bless them, backwards decision Edited December 5, 2018 by Billy b 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Astanley 11,465 Posted December 5, 2018 Report Share Posted December 5, 2018 8 hours ago, baker boy said: When they're caught red handed butchering a British soldier in broad daylight, just 1 example Fair enough ,there are cases that are without any kind of doubt ,and there are people who deserve capital punishment ,I just don't trust the judicial system to get them all right . 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,362 Posted December 5, 2018 Report Share Posted December 5, 2018 Un f***ing beleiveable, i mean what the fook, he slit the waines throats ffs, no risk, are these lowlife parole wankstains accountable for these decisions? What kind of brain would think this mans no risk, liberalism. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sandymere 8,260 Posted December 6, 2018 Report Share Posted December 6, 2018 We need more whole life sentences from which there should be no parole available, the only release would be if new evidence proved innocence. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,622 Posted December 6, 2018 Report Share Posted December 6, 2018 3 minutes ago, sandymere said: We need more whole life sentences from which there should be no parole available, the only release would be if new evidence proved innocence. Didn't we have problems with that recently? I'm recalling something about it being a human right to be eligible for parole...... Totally agree though. Some crimes deserve Outlawry! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted December 6, 2018 Report Share Posted December 6, 2018 16 hours ago, Francie said: Un f***ing beleiveable, i mean what the fook, he slit the waines throats ffs, no risk, are these lowlife parole wankstains accountable for these decisions? What kind of brain would think this mans no risk, liberalism. It's worse than that Francie. They don't consider him to be a "significant" risk. That would mean they think he is a risk, but not enough to worry about. As said earlier any risk is too much. Why should people like this have any human rights? That went out the window when he committed murder. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 24,838 Posted December 6, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2018 8 minutes ago, sid g said: one way to deal with em ----- seen that a few year back.....fair play to that father.... wonder if the father of those kids is alive? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 24,838 Posted December 6, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2018 1 minute ago, sid g said: he died tomo saw an interview where he vowed to kill him on his release he said if he wasn't alive he hoped someone else would do it for him .. shame that..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shaaark 10,112 Posted December 6, 2018 Report Share Posted December 6, 2018 33 minutes ago, walshie said: It's worse than that Francie. They don't consider him to be a "significant" risk. That would mean they think he is a risk, but not enough to worry about. As said earlier any risk is too much. Why should people like this have any human rights? That went out the window when he committed murder. 100% correct there mate, and exactly what I've been saying for years Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.