elliotmcc 67 Posted February 16, 2018 Report Share Posted February 16, 2018 https://www.portadowntimes.co.uk/news/pair-said-to-be-releasing-dogs-to-tear-rabbits-apart-judge-1-8375746 Quote Link to post
Welsh_red 4,298 Posted February 16, 2018 Report Share Posted February 16, 2018 Judge is as much to blame as the media 3 1 Quote Link to post
Aussie Whip 3,819 Posted February 16, 2018 Report Share Posted February 16, 2018 Should be,2 caring young men helping to keep the vermin population under control to help the rural economy free of charge,judge commends them. 1 Quote Link to post
roybo 2,873 Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 Comparing hunting to killing a puppy ffs Quote Link to post
rob284 1,678 Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 Judge isnt of sound judgement taking issue with a legal pursuit. They deserve getting lifted though, driving with no insurance, no excuse. 2 Quote Link to post
Welsh_red 4,298 Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 54 minutes ago, rob284 said: Judge isnt of sound judgement taking issue with a legal pursuit. They deserve getting lifted though, driving with no insurance, no excuse. Not sure where a judge's personal beliefs stand whitin the job and the law. Quote Link to post
Bobtheferret 1,223 Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 Not sure why what they were doing has anything to do with driving without insurance (provided it wasn’t illegal which hunting rabbits obviously isn’t) Judge is showing clear personal bias and should be impartial. Was no need to even mention the rabbit hunting in the article. Classic leftie using a the media to push their own agenda. Bullshit. 1 Quote Link to post
Black neck 15,156 Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 Tearing rabbits to pieces must have been running them beddy xs Quote Link to post
Maximus Ferret 2,055 Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 Where was their solicitor in all this and why did they admit anything to do with poaching when their dogs seemingly hadn't left the car. Motoring offences were the only crime here. The cop's opinion of what they were about to do means nothing if they hadn't done it. Is he a mind reader or what??? 1 Quote Link to post
dogmandont 9,312 Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 The lines between right and wrong are more than blurred they’ve actually switched place. When a JUDGE sees fit to take more offence from something that is legal than that that is illegal you know the whole thing is fubar.. 2 Quote Link to post
The one 8,390 Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 Just proof that judges live in another world they dont have a clue Quote Link to post
Guest edrd Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 (edited) ? Edited February 18, 2018 by edrd Quote Link to post
elliotmcc 67 Posted February 18, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 (edited) Definately does not know the Hunting act very well, biased twat. I would call her a c*nt but then itd be calling her useful ? Edited February 18, 2018 by elliotmcc Quote Link to post
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 Reading that article, the only proven crime is driving without insurance ! The rest seems to be bull5hit.............unless having a dog in a car was made illegal while I wasn't looking ! 1 Quote Link to post
elliotmcc 67 Posted February 18, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 its our local paper trying to stir up hype and outrage, mountain from molehills media, at the expense of the doggymen. Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.