Big Cat Sighting

[Francie 6,362]

6 minutes ago, Francie said:

My point is charts,ape to man evoloution is on its last legs,it's clear to see now even in evoloution circles,that all the homos lol erectus sapien,neandertal etc are humans,just a variation due to region an diet,an it makes sense.

Ffs even now there's people in the world who look like erectus,big brows,flat skulls.

To begin with there's barely slight differences in all the hominoids anyway,java man Lucy etc 

There's no inbetween.

Darwin seen what we see today,variation in the kind,due to region of the world an diet

Even Rudolf Virchow,the godfather of pathology,who studied neandertal man said he was a homo sapien,a human.

[chartpolski 20,408]

3 minutes ago, Francie said:

My point is charts,ape to man evoloution is on its last legs,it's clear to see now even in evoloution circles,that all the homos lol erectus sapien,neandertal etc are humans,just a variation due to region an diet,an it makes sense.

Ffs even now there's people in the world who look like erectus,big brows,flat skulls.

To begin with there's barely slight differences in all the hominoids anyway,java man Lucy etc 

There's no inbetween.

Darwin seen what we see today,variation in the kind,due to region of the world an diet

Aren't Homo sapiens and Neanderthals different branches of hominids just as chimps and bonobos are different branches of apes ?

Anyhow, I still can't grasp what your point is ? 

Are you denying evolution ? 

Are you saying ALL the branches of hominids are basically Homo sapiens, differing  only because of their diet and location ?

Cheers.

[chartpolski 20,408]

Are you saying humans didn't descend from apes ?

i probably agree with you, because I've allways understood humans and apes descended from a common ancestor, not a linear progression from ape to man.

Cheers.

[Francie 6,362]

8 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

Aren't Homo sapiens and Neanderthals different branches of hominids just as chimps and bonobos are different branches of apes ?

Anyhow, I still can't grasp what your point is ? 

Are you denying evolution ? 

Are you saying ALL the branches of hominids are basically Homo sapiens, differing  only because of their diet and location ?

Cheers.

No there saying we evolved from erectus to sapien from two million years ago up until 250,000 year ago there saying erectus died out to leave us homo sapiens from 250,000 years to present an I'm sayings it's lies.

There was no evoloution from ape to human,just a variation in human kind all along differing from region of world an diet.

That's what science shows us,day in day out,it's easily testable an verifiable,there already on it but it's a hard but to let go

Edited May 3, 2021 by Francie

[Ken's Deputy 4,456]

This thread is fukked then.

[sandymere 8,261]

6 hours ago, Ken's Deputy said:

This thread is fukked then.

It was always a bit of a flight of fancy . 

[keepdiggin 9,216]

51 minutes ago, sandymere said:

It was always a bit of a flight of fancy . 

Like Jeremy corbyn being prime minister

[Greb147 6,808]

8 hours ago, Francie said:

No there saying we evolved from erectus to sapien from two million years ago up until 250,000 year ago there saying erectus died out to leave us homo sapiens from 250,000 years to present an I'm sayings it's lies.

There was no evoloution from ape to human,just a variation in human kind all along differing from region of world an diet.

That's what science shows us,day in day out,it's easily testable an verifiable,there already on it but it's a hard but to let go

Any verifiable events in the Bible such has humans living for a thousand years? 

What about day and night before the creation of the sun? Don't tell me, god had a giant candle. 

 

[greg64 2,562]

9 hours ago, Francie said:

Big deal it was a human

it's homo erectus skeleton that you said didn't exist ,and your reply say's it all ,i get that it really is no point arguing with people like you who not so long ago were probably burning witches at the stake and seeing if they could survive the ducking stool so i will leave it at that plus this is the  big cat thread which i don't want to spoil

Edited May 4, 2021 by greg64

[Francie 6,362]

1 hour ago, greg64 said:

it's homo erectus skeleton that you said didn't exist ,and your reply say's it all ,i get that it really is no point arguing with people like you who not so long ago were probably burning witches at the stake and seeing if they could survive the ducking stool so i will leave it at that plus this is the  big cat thread which i don't want to spoil

Making assumptions again Greg,I mever said they didn't exist,what I said was that homo erectus,neandertal,cromagnon,are humans,nothing in between,just variation due to different regions an diet.

[Francie 6,362]

Just now, Francie said:

Making assumptions again Greg,I mever said they didn't exist,what I said was that homo erectus,neandertal,cromagnon,are humans,nothing in between,just variation due to different regions an diet.

What I meant was all they above aren't evolved from apes,there pissing in the wind looking for something that ain't there,an trying to label human bones,ie,turkana man,java man,etc as the evolved link,bollox

[greg64 2,562]

4 minutes ago, Francie said:

What I meant was all they above aren't evolved from apes,there pissing in the wind looking for something that ain't there,an trying to label human bones,ie,turkana man,java man,etc as the evolved link,bollox

DNA Agrees With All the Other Science: Darwin Was Right | Discover Magazine  great read that you might find interesting 

[Francie 6,362]

2 hours ago, Greb147 said:

Any verifiable events in the Bible such has humans living for a thousand years? 

What about day and night before the creation of the sun? Don't tell me, god had a giant candle. 

 

There's no evidence only historical that they lived to that age,family trees etc 

But there could be evidence in the mythology of it all,did the Greek gods not live to that age,myths are myths but there could be something in it

 

 

[Greb147 6,808]

3 minutes ago, Francie said:

There's no evidence only historical that they lived to that age,family trees etc 

But there could be evidence in the mythology of it all,did the Greek gods not live to that age,myths are myths but there could be something in it

 

 

So only word of mouth by charlatans? 

How did God give us day and night before he created the sun? 

[Francie 6,362]

6 minutes ago, greg64 said:

DNA Agrees With All the Other Science: Darwin Was Right | Discover Magazine  great read that you might find interesting 

He describes micro evoloution,then extrapolates that to macro,seen it all before nothing new.