norseman 424 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 900 Link to post Share on other sites
Lab 10,979 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 He was 900.....ffs....pmsl Link to post Share on other sites
oneredtrim 148 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 Just to put a spanner or three in the works, what about the parting of the dead sea, the ark with just 2 of each animal how did he feed them all? Moses must have been some hefty fella carting those slabs down a mountain or Samson and all those stories. All those authors would be pullitzer prize winners these days. Their hooch must have been something special. If their is a god why do paedophiles exist and millions of children dieing. More holes than a leaky sieve with the bible is true argument. i think the parting was the red sea Brewman, though the red sea parting cause of a whole host of geographical coming togethers is not unique to jc...the dead sea is the walking on water..though once again you and me would have trouble sinking in that sea...and it's nothing to do with the much quoted salt content. Mary and the immaculate conception was a trick n half, he could hardly say he'd slung a brass one though could he. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 they have proved nothing there saying we evolved from a rock 3 billion years ago,haha how non living matter evolved to living matter an found a mate its ridiculous.now there using faith because they have observed nothing.so its religon.they billions of years its a fairytale with no evidence at all Link to post Share on other sites
Lab 10,979 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 they have proved nothing there saying we evolved from a rock 3 billion years ago,haha how non living matter evolved to living matter an found a mate its ridiculous.now there using faith because they have observed nothing.so its religon.they billions of years its a fairytale with no evidence at all So you believe in Adam and Eve then or something similar??? Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 12,387 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 Lab nowadays it's Adam and Steve lol 2 Link to post Share on other sites
R.A.W 1,987 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 PRAISE THE LORD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites
BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 laugh away lads plenty ofevidence to back it up,now I beleive in an intelligent designer,proof everywere,you beleive in dirt.now who stupid now your ancestors far back is slime which ran of rocks,then intermediates which never been found to apes ffs Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,637 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 im not getting embroiled in the whole god science argument, but has science actually proved the start so to speak? I know that they've proved the making of matter /anti matter criac, but I cant believe everything a scientist says either. I do believe they probably are near enough. some people treat science like a religion though which is no different to religion. p.s I was raised catholic, I respect others beliefs. but I lost the faith years ago. and im not fully aware of all the scientific evidence so don't jump down my throat. but im interested in science as a whole. so if someone can enlighten me as for the "start" please do so Simply.... No. We have to be careful with the word 'proof', it simply means to high probability. Cosmologists believe they understand the evolution of the Universe right the way back to moments after the singularity that it grew from. However understanding beyond that moment in time is proving tricky. There are four fundamental forces in nature and they were not present in the forms they are now back then, tying them together in one theory is often referred to as the Grand Unified Theory or Unified Field Theory and offshoots of Physics like M-Theory/String Theory and Quantum Loop Gravity have emerged as potential explanations but it's all very theoretical to date. Don't ask me to go into depth on any of these fields of study because I'd have to research them for myself and that shit depresses me. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Hareydave 1,214 Posted August 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 laugh away lads plenty ofevidence to back it up,now I beleive in an intelligent designer,proof everywere,you beleive in dirt.now who stupid now your ancestors far back is slime which ran of rocks,then intermediates which never been found to apes ffsDNA backs up darwin Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 12,387 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 laugh away lads plenty ofevidence to back it up,now I beleive in an intelligent designer,proof everywere,you beleive in dirt.now who stupid now your ancestors far back is slime which ran of rocks,then intermediates which never been found to apes ffsTell you what you learn to bloody spell an I'll take you seriously lmao! Makes more sense that something changes over billions of years than some dude high as fuuck went i know what I'm gonna do today I'm gonna create life lol come on mate you are one post away from being labeled a fucktard ffs Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,637 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 laugh away lads plenty ofevidence to back it up,now I beleive in an intelligent designer,proof everywere,you beleive in dirt.now who stupid now your ancestors far back is slime which ran of rocks,then intermediates which never been found to apes ffsTell you what you learn to bloody spell an I'll take you seriously lmao! Makes more sense that something changes over billions of years than some dude high as fuuck went i know what I'm gonna do today I'm gonna create life lol come on mate you are one post away from being labeled a fucktard ffs Evolution doesn't take billions of years, it's been witnessed and recorded scientifically over a matter of years. But that's where Creationists tell us that they believe in 'Microevolution' but it's all very different to 'Macroevolution'.... LOL Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 12,387 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 Born for me mate those theories hold water and are in dire need of a unified equation time will tell Link to post Share on other sites
treecreeper 1,136 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 (edited) laugh away lads plenty ofevidence to back it up,now I beleive in an intelligent designer,proof everywere,you beleive in dirt.now who stupid now your ancestors far back is slime which ran of rocks,then intermediates which never been found to apes ffsTell you what you learn to bloody spell an I'll take you seriously lmao! Makes more sense that something changes over billions of years than some dude high as fuuck went i know what I'm gonna do today I'm gonna create life lol come on mate you are one post away from being labeled a fucktard ffs thats how a lot of kids are conceived to be fair mush lol Edited August 11, 2014 by treecreeper Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,637 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 Born for me mate those theories hold water and are in dire need of a unified equation time will tell Aye, I agree they both have their merits but Quantum anything is forking mind numbing, lol. I get more excited by Cosmology and Relativity. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts