Couple Of Names To Watch Out For ,must Read

[da slayer 204]

Wots, da slayer and black dog, is the wrong uns???

hahaha your a the wrong un lad I know a few lads on here tha can vouch for me..who can vouch for u tho ye dirty grass

[gasman 53]

[quote name="dillydog" post="

 

dillydog do you think the interview type books that Bluck, and Broadhurst do could have brought a lot of un wanted attention to working dog men, as let's face it, there seems to be a lot of men wanting to tell the whole world what they do, and keep.

[roundmouth86 251]

gasman if your a proud owner of any type of dog then you shouldnt denie the fact that you keep them. and i also believe that when everything is legal and in the name of livestock protection there should be little for the retard anti morons to use against the terrierman. just my opinion. so if a chapter is wrote on a hunt terrierman or pest controller the worst that can happen is somebody else knows there name. big deal

[dytkos 17,536]

This has been on before and although its 2/3 years old, (which means the vehicles may have changed) I'll put it up again.

Cheers, D.

[gasman 53]

roundmouth86 why do we have user names on here then dillydog wasn't breaking the law, but still got his door nocked, and treated like a terrorist. Why do most men who write in Darcy books use none de plumes? I know of 1 fella that had 15 dogs taken, and when they-couldn't find anything to do him with, they tried to charge him with an old dog having canker.

[dytkos 17,536]

More, mostly South West but could be anywhere

[dytkos 17,536]

3

[dytkos 17,536]

4

[roundmouth86 251]

my point was that if your proud of something you own then who is anybody to tell you to hide it from the world. if everythings in order then your fine

[marshman 7,756]

my point was that if your proud of something you own then who is anybody to tell you to hide it from the world. if everythings in order then your fine

even if everything is in good order the RSPCA can still make your life hard . How many times have you seen good men working their dogs within the law and still get taken to court or given back a bag of bones that was once a good dog . No I'm afraid in today's climate it's wise to play your cards close to ya chest !!

[roundmouth86 251]

i also believe it best to play it safe but would never denie owning dogs i was proud of.

[paulus 26]

my point was that if your proud of something you own then who is anybody to tell you to hide it from the world. if everythings in order then your fine

i believe the dymented story tells different

[roundmouth86 251]

fair enough im not sayin blow your trumpet about it but dont be embaressed or ashamed about it either

[marshman 7,756]

fair enough im not sayin blow your trumpet about it but dont be embaressed or ashamed about it either

Big difference between being shrewd enough not to cause yourself unwanted trouble , and being ashamed or embarrassed. A clever man learns from he's mistakes although a truly wise man learns from other people's !

[dymented 2,220]

fair enough im not sayin blow your trumpet about it but dont be embaressed or ashamed about it either

Every thing i did was on permission and in writing. They do not need any excuse to seize the animals the police are like puppets doing the crap the rspca can not do as they have no power. Then they pass the blame to each other so it takes weeks, months to get them to court. if they think they can get you for anything they will try . Do not think they wont they will they don't care if its all legal and above bored they have 140.000.000 at there disposal. in the eyes of the police and rspca your guilty because you hunt. Even though its perfectly legal to hunt rat,rabbit,fox with a dog under the defra guidelines