Stephen Lawrence trial

[Gin 496]

The whole idea of this day was for British society to hold up its hands and say yes we have a big problem in this country but we are trying to do something about it.

 

No it wasnt....it was a murder trial nothing more nothing less........no different to any other murder trial on any day of any week.....well shouldnt have been anyway....but due to dogooding lefty idiots like you the whole country has been forced to sit listening to this regurgitated shit for near 20 years......who the f**k was Stephen Lawrence anyway he was nobody special yet his death has been given more attention than if the queen had been murdered !......we are the most tolerant country on planet earth,no other nation in the world can figure out why Britain is so totally obssessed with " anti racism ".........so dont sit mumbling about us having a big problem with " racism " in this country......if people like you gave it a rest for 5 minutes the country might settle down instead of every tom dick and harry jumping about screaming these ridiculous meaningless words and phrases.....

And on the subject of Lawrence,lets not forget the rule book was ripped up for this " special case "...800 years of criminal law scrapped for 1 black teenager.....that Dobson fella was tried for this murder 16 years ago and found not guilty......whatever happened to double jeopardy....before this case he would have been within his rights to say piss off you had your chance and f****d it..........as for the mother going on about this " racist country ".......had it happened in her own country it wouldnt even of made the newspapers !

 

The rule book was NOT ripped up for this special case. The double jeopardy law was changed because of a Middlesborough womans fight for justice for her daughter, long before this case.

http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/press_releases/155_06/

[lazyhunter 111]

so did the evidence show who killed him or just they were there

 

I personally think that they (as a gang) were responsible for the lads death, but you I don't think there is anyway of knowing exactly who stabbed him unless one of them decides to grass in the future.

 

They found Stephen Lawrence's blood and hair on Norris' jeans and jacket, but the blood and hair could of been transferred from one of his friends or from the old bill contaminating Norris' clothes by putting them in the same bag as the clothes Lawrence was killed in.

 

well there one thing mate,there no chance in hell will that be overturned in a miscarrage of justice. this whole case was a shambles from the word go. any other run of the mill murder and a QC would have been onto that in a flash.now they wouldnt touch it with a barge pole. gotta feel some sympathy for the ones or one that didnt actually kill him. whatever else they might or not be,no one cant deny thier loyality to each other.

i wonder when there doing there time that so called loyality might begin to wane and the others begin to panic. the police cant make a c**t of it again with the world media watchin them. Edited January 5, 2012 by lazyhunter

[Catcher 1 639]

1. Convicted or not.I hope every one of them rot in hell.No mother of father should have to lay a child to rest.Burn the scum.
   

[scothunter 12,609]

like i said earlier catcher i have no problem with the parents seeking justice. but they got thir conviction.the lads are away for a long time,and i wonder if it had been white on white would they have got the length of sentence they did. my point is lay there son and this tragic event to rest now. why push for a new sentencing. they got the max sentence under british law,thats what i meant.

[scothunter 12,609]

so did the evidence show who killed him or just they were there

 

I personally think that they (as a gang) were responsible for the lads death, but you I don't think there is anyway of knowing exactly who stabbed him unless one of them decides to grass in the future.

 

They found Stephen Lawrence's blood and hair on Norris' jeans and jacket, but the blood and hair could of been transferred from one of his friends or from the old bill contaminating Norris' clothes by putting them in the same bag as the clothes Lawrence was killed in.

 

well there one thing mate,there no chance in hell will that be overturned in a miscarrage of justice. this whole case was a shambles from the word go. any other run of the mill murder and a QC would have been onto that in a flash.now they wouldnt touch it with a barge pole. gotta feel some sympathy for the ones or one that didnt actually kill him. whatever else they might or not be,no one cant deny thier loyality to each other.

i wonder when there doing there time that so called loyality might begin to wane and the others begin to panic. the police cant make a c**t of it again with the world media watchin them.

 

that ships sailed,if they were gonna buckle they would have done so already. nothing in it for them to grass.

[Roxyboi 64]

it was on the news earlier that some action group have made a complaint that the sentence isn enough. something to do with they were triad as juvenilles,seems fair they were just that werent they. they dont want this high profile case to go away do they.just bolsters my view that there are dark forces (pun intended) milking this for all its worth.sad thing is the cps said they are gonna review it.is there no limit to how much we appease they c**ts. id tell them to f**k off.

 

They will not be happy until every white person in the UK knows their place, bowing down to these black fanatics

[gnasher16 29,649]

The rule book was NOT ripped up for this special case. The double jeopardy law was changed because of a Middlesborough womans fight for justice for her daughter, long before this case.

http://www.cps.gov.u...eleases/155_06/

 

I guess the Telegraph got it wrong then mate eh .....

 

http://www.telegraph...rosecution.html ...............2005 is not " long before this case " when Dobson got a not guilty in 96.

Edited January 5, 2012 by gnasher16

[gnasher16 29,649]

 

I didn't say that they have learnt from their mistakes as a definitive statement though mate, I said they probably have learnt more than any of us lot have, which I would of thought they would have considering the shit they must have had to put up with since becoming public enemy number 1.

 

 

Right i got you mate ....i thought you meant they have learned by their mistake so shouldnt get banged up....my mistake.......whatever way you look at it they,re going to have a rough ride inside......no thanks to the media hysteria over the last 20 years !!

[scothunter 12,609]

1. Convicted or not.I hope every one of them rot in hell.No mother of father should have to lay a child to rest.Burn the scum.
   

 

dont they have mothers and fathers.

[Gin 496]

The rule book was NOT ripped up for this special case. The double jeopardy law was changed because of a Middlesborough womans fight for justice for her daughter, long before this case.

http://www.cps.gov.u...eleases/155_06/

 

I guess the Telegraphn got it wrong then mate eh .....

 

http://www.telegraph...rosecution.html

Yes, look at the dates

[fazza123 513]

The law didn't change for will Dunlop he was merely the first convicted after the law had changed !! My understanding of it anyway !

[Attack Fell Terrier 864]

The whole idea of this day was for British society to hold up its hands and say yes we have a big problem in this country but we are trying to do something about it.

 

No it wasnt....it was a murder trial nothing more nothing less........no different to any other murder trial on any day of any week.....well shouldnt have been anyway....but due to dogooding lefty idiots like you the whole country has been forced to sit listening to this regurgitated shit for near 20 years......who the f**k was Stephen Lawrence anyway he was nobody special yet his death has been given more attention than if the queen had been murdered !......we are the most tolerant country on planet earth,no other nation in the world can figure out why Britain is so totally obssessed with " anti racism ".........so dont sit mumbling about us having a big problem with " racism " in this country......if people like you gave it a rest for 5 minutes the country might settle down instead of every tom dick and harry jumping about screaming these ridiculous meaningless words and phrases.....

And on the subject of Lawrence,lets not forget the rule book was ripped up for this " special case "...800 years of criminal law scrapped for 1 black teenager.....that Dobson fella was tried for this murder 16 years ago and found not guilty......whatever happened to double jeopardy....before this case he would have been within his rights to say piss off you had your chance and f****d it..........as for the mother going on about this " racist country ".......had it happened in her own country it wouldnt even of made the newspapers !

 

The rule book was NOT ripped up for this special case. The double jeopardy law was changed because of a Middlesborough womans fight for justice for her daughter, long before this case.

http://www.cps.gov.u...eleases/155_06/

 

It wasn't the first case, as you have pointed out but Apparently this case was a major influence into the law being changed, so what Gnasher has said isn't too far from the truth!

 

From The Telegraph :-

 

 

The law of double jeopardy meant no one could be tried twice for the same crime but that legal principle was abolished in 2005 following a series of high profile campaigns.

The Lawrence murder played a key part and Sir William Macpherson recommended the law be changed following his inquiry in to the case in 1999.

 

So there you go, a young black life seems to be worth more in this country if it's taken under the same circumstances as this case.

[Attack Fell Terrier 864]

The law didn't change for will Dunlop he was merely the first convicted after the law had changed !! My understanding of it anyway !

 

exactly

[Gin 496]

It was that case that brought about the change because of Ann Ming

[gnasher16 29,649]

From my understanding the difference between the Lawrence case and the case Gin is talking about is that in the Lawrence case the Macpherson Report directed that an aquitted suspect could be re-tried IF new evidence was found.................whereas in the Dunlop case he actually confessed after getting aquitted first time round and pleaded guilty in a re-trial as well as being done for purgery............so although Dunlop was the first to be convicted ( in 2005 ) it was under different circumstances..........the Lawrence case has been described as " One of the most important moments in the modern history of criminal justice "..................thats the power the so called " ethnic minorities " have in England !!

Edited January 6, 2012 by gnasher16