frazdog
-
Content Count
1,827 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by frazdog
-
thats interesting socks,but not to be confused with macro evo lol were did you get them facts socks?
-
haha
-
great news fair play atb
-
well lad its about the evidence,an the facts state your two eg to be proven untrue, I interested in the recent genetic info you talk about,do you want to share with me bh?
-
your saying biology an genetics,here is a bioligist "Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth-bound, feathered dinosaur," Feduccia says. "But it's not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that." Allan Feduccia, Professor of biology at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "Archaeopteryx: Early Bird Catches a Can of Worms", Science, Vol. 259, 5 February 1993, p. 764
-
so your telling me dna an genetics prove evoloution,how do you figure bh¿
-
lad le monte is well known so you dont trust your own evoloutionists,it only had 40% of skeleton,so which parts were like human,bearing in mind it was 3 ft tall an weighed 40 kilos
-
lad im just putting the facts out there im not doing nothing of sort,these are the scientists you wanted to hear,this is le monte,an top evo scientist this is what he said about archeoptrex,the perching bird I'd like to start off by sharing a few quotes from evolutionists. This "argument from authority" is a much-hated tactic that creationists sometimes use, but alas, it reveals the truth that not all qualified scientists look at Archae (abbreviated for this article) in the same light. I'll start with ardent evolutionist Pierre Lecomte du Nouy: "We are not even authorized to consider
-
lucy was just a small ptimate who weighed 40kilos an was 3feet tall lad I researched these finds for years an 90% of scientists even evoloutionary scientists say it was a chimp,it only had 40% of its skeleton http://www.forerunner.com/forerunner/X0714_Lucy_fails_test.html
-
I suggest you read this bh,the first quote is from a very well known evo scientist,who says archeoptrex shouldnt even come in argument cause it has no intermediates before or after http://www.trueauthority.com/cvse/archaeopteryx.htm
-
aww you mean lucy,which only 40% of the skelton was found,that was proved wrong 50 years ago haha archeoptrex the bird,haha that only evoloution scientist say Is a link bh I knew your were gona say them two theve been proved lucy was a small monkey an archeoptrex is a perching bird, mate youl have to do better than that
-
hello lads,hows the banter today,bh could you give me an eg please of these transitional fossils¿
-
thats me here lads,i look forward to a load of qs when im done, paulas if we didnt evolve or be created what is mans origin,bearing in mind aliens would have to evolve lol goodnight
-
yeah your right paulas,if it cant be proved thats that,but ive a conscience,an that tells me when an whats morally right an wrong,that can be proved
-
yeah but it is a paradox
-
KIND a group of animals plants iinsects fish that reproduce after their kind,with variation species,within the kind
-
thats layman terms for the thl massive,not subjectory long an mindnumbling words from scientists lad
-
last one before I catch a big fox haha if a black man an a chinese woman have a baby an it comes out diff,are you telling me there a diff species haha no there a variation in kind HUMAN kind haha
-
give me an eg how the teachings of the bible have lead people down a morally destructive path please paulas. an no bh thats a variation in kind it still has all attributes of a wolf but smaller an diff colour thats it, if two humans are white an have a black baby or vice versa,your telling me bh that its a different species haha I would say a variation witin kind hows that for you
-
thanks lad,never heard of it but dna is so complex its amazing an if the suits want to say diff pig is a quote fault,then thats up to them,i wouldnt say it was a fault unless its prohibiting sight,tho the creator made humans an animals insects with the same building blocks eg keratin so it wouldnt surprise me if there the same. like ford make diff trucks,an the wheels would fit each truck,or windows would fit diff trucks etc that means to me the creator ford is usin good building blocks materials for there creation,doesnt mean they evolved from a pile of scrap metal hundred yrs ago lol
-
yes paulas an I admit that, but these folk cant admit there in same boat its just a theory, they cant admit it so that tells you something an plus my taxpayers money is not getting used to teach our primary school children something that their saying is fact,which is complete bull,an leads children down a morally destructive path.
-
yes gnash but people on here cant answer the q macro is a scientific THEORY not fact an never will be
-
you keep telling yourself that paulas,it still dont prove your alien invented us crap,cause were did aliens come from,aw I forgot they evolved before us,whistle haha
-
haha its an hours drive away paulas,have you not checked out your et theory,beam me up paulas haha
-
a sycamore,a chestnut,a pine are all species of a tree,there not gona produce a skunk plant haha im heading lamping,so il catch up later,iff anyone can show me evidence of macro evo,origin of man,supposedley I would love to see it peace out brothers lol
