BGD
-
Content Count
7,679 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Posts posted by BGD
-
-
3 minutes ago, WILF said:
I’m going to go off on a tangent here, but I’ll tell you who I f***ing loath……those Facebook vigilante so called Peado hunter groups……..absolute f***ing howling arseholes to a man !
All I ever see is them bullying the life out of some poor c**t with an intellectual disability who probably has a mental age of ten……6 handed giving it the heavy bit with a spastic….amazing !
f***ing hate those people !
If they have evidence, send it to the law and that’s it……narcissistic pricks !
Something really wrong with these folk who spend their days pretending to be kids chatting sexually with nonces IMO. How could you stomach it?
-
5
-
-
21 minutes ago, Greyman said:
Just go and put your socks and sandles on and have a hallumi samdwhich you inconsequential little fool you have made a mistake no one else is bothered except you and I just enjoy spanking your silly little arse so probably best to just give it a rest and save your blood pressure
As usual when you're proven wrong when talking to someone who knows way more about a subject than you the toys come flying out the pram and the insults come pouring out. You really are a pathetic little man
Lived a sad empty life so can't believe anyone else has ever done anything interesting with theirs.
-
1 minute ago, Greyman said:
Stop it your just looking more stupid than normal it’s a standard you,ve been caught fibbing now just run along the parrot needs some seed
I said the regulations were down to individual local authorities, you posted the regulations from a single local authority. Are you really this thick
-
7 hours ago, dai dogs said:
Dog walker didn’t have insurance nor do the owner
Where there's blame, there's a claim
dog walker absolutely is responsible for the bill and if they don't have insurance well that's their problem.
-
4 minutes ago, mr moocher said:
thanks mack shes really good with numbers they didnot take after me none have a criminal record which considering is a big plus for me
Broke the cycle pal you should be really proud
-
2
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, WILF said:
I will also add, I loathed private school…..I had nothing in common with the people and no affiliation to them at all…..
Also now days, it’s not the school fees, it’s the added extras that you need to afford (like the trip to some exotic place or 3 different types of sports kit or whatever) and if you can’t then they are singled out amongst their peers.
My sister got a full academic scholarship to some fancy full board private school (Christ's Hospital if you've heard of it) and she ended up leaving in her second year because she just could not fit in as a rough as arseholes working class lass with an Irish accent. Ended up bouncing round state schools, dropping out at 15 before going back to college to do her exams and still ended up getting in to Oxford (the only one in our family to go to Uni) Couldn't agree with your other post more pal
-
3
-
-
3 hours ago, Greyman said:
You will be waiting a long time you pedantic point scoring little prick you have spouted shite since trying to be involved once again you clearly had nothing to do with importing before or after the DWA a parrot in your mums house don’t count
Don’t even know what you are trying to say there is it the first lines for a new song your working on ??
You have quoted the regulations from a single local authority you absolute fecking doughnut, literally proving my point for me
-
18 hours ago, Greyman said:
Total bollox each animal Is kept within two perimeter fences under cameras that’s why people let them go they either never had the facility’s or could not afford them wildlife parks and zoos were inundated and the only other opposition was release them or pts you clearly had nothing to do with this despite your claims it’s always those that shout bullshit that live by those rules and that’s why they judge others by there own standards total twat
Still waiting for that apology and admission you had it wrong pal, be a man not a little girl having a sulk
-
18 minutes ago, greg64 said:
this place didn't sound like they were kept in safe enclosures with someone witnessing a big cat on the wrong side of the enclosure ‘This is like a UK Tiger King’: How it all went wrong for a big cat ‘sanctuary’ (msn.com)
Nice paragraph here showing I'm correct to say it's down to local authorities and there's no central government rules and regulations as to how they're kept, I'm sure @Greyman will be along to apologise for saying I had no idea what I'm talking about any minute now
-
2
-
-
That's some view that pal
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:
You must have been stood inside the 1st perimeter fence when you took those pics you posted?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Greyman said:
How about the other 4 complete ones we have all planted I guess you cock
You haven't shared those stories so I can't really comment on how believable I find them.
But how do you distinguish between a DNA sample from a black Panthera pardus and a normal coloured one? Didn't realise DNA sequencing of big cats had come along so far
-
Just now, Greyman said:
Total bollox each animal Is kept within two perimeter fences under cameras that’s why people let them go they either never had the facility’s or could not afford them wildlife parks and zoos were inundated and the only other opposition was release them or pts you clearly had nothing to do with this despite your claims it’s always those that shout bullshit that live by those rules and that’s why they judge others by there own standards total twat
Different rules in different local authorities for DWA pal there is no centralised regulation unless you're running a zoo open to the public, you haven't a clue.
-
29 minutes ago, Greyman said:
Pantheras pardos is leopard mate the girl that stiffly is obssesed about only got a partial dna of the genus panthera don’t let citizen smith and stiff confuse you mate it’s not doable and as there is only one known captive black leopard in the uk they would all relate back to that it’s just stupid people spouting shite and trying to shout others Down it’s not being planted it is real and each one has been worked for
You just said yourself the sample was only good enough to identify the genus not the species so why does the one known captive black leopard in the UK matter? They wouldn't be able to trace the sample back to it because it wasn't a complete sample, they can't even say if it was a leopard or not let alone the colour and lineage
Also the fact there is only a single black leopard in the UK should clue you in on just how rare (my pal reckons non-existent but I'm sure there were a couple he didn't know about) they were in the pet trade before and after the ban. But you think there was enough being kept in private hands that went on to be relased, survive and establish breeding populations across the country
Your head is in the feckin clouds.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, C.green said:
I seen dogs with more secure housing then what them motherfuckers were bieng kept in
You would be seriously shocked at some of the enclosures that get approved for keeping DWA in. It's all down to individual Local Authorities and the vets they decide to hire to do the inspections and plenty of them have no experience with anything more exotic than a hamster...
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Greyman said:
You are portraying yourself as an expert of the time so why don’t you give us the answer as I don’t no or really care but I know they are here now and not escaping as there are none to escape it’s not that hard to grasp black hairs and saliva dna of leopards that don’t exist unless you actually accept stiffys version that we are now importing and planting dna the blokes a total arse Sharon has put in years of research to finally get that result and I hope one day I will also be the one to get a positive sample it’s the icing on the cake, a bit like stiffy getting a pat on the back and being told what a good boy he’s been
I've given you my answer you fecking doughnut
Why is it so hard to believe that someone who is obsessed with proving big cats roam the countryside (and stands to gain financially from finding "evidence") might decide to plant that evidence? Happens all the time with folk who are so sure of something so decide the ends justify the means and fake the evidence. Surely anyone with half a brain would be at least slightly skeptical especially given she has apparently falsified pictures before and has the means of acquiring cat DNA to plant. Completely dismissing the idea that she could have planted evidence is just being willfully blind because you want to believe.
-
1
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:
Ah tabtv Old chestnut again
These lads obviously never worked a job with a boss? Sure everyone who isn't self employed spends their working day taking orders
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Greyman said:
Look at what you have just wrote mate your contradicting yourself, The trade was a constant churn of cubs, indicates there were lots of them and very few records kept
Records of cubs/cats imported, bred (small numbers, there was never an industry of backyard big cat breeders
) and sold were kept because that's how businesses are run, that's what the estimates are based on. Wheres the contradiction?
Now how about you answer my original question, how many big cats do you think were in private hands when the ban came in? And if you're feeling generous how about a rough species breakdown?
-
9 minutes ago, Greyman said:
I would have thought you would know the answer to that as the biggest importer of exotic animals, you should also know how easy cats are to breed and people were breeding in captivity for the pet trade just like they are today with bengals and savannah cats etc having a pet shop and a few parrots don’t make you joey exotic so unless you have something a little more substantial than that I’d not bother getting involved trying to answer a question with another question is just equal to nothing
Where did I say I was the biggest importer of exotic animals? Or claim to be Joey Exotic?
I answered you question and asked you another, that's generally how conversations go if one party isn't a massive girls blouse who gets her knickers in a bunch at the slightest push back Anyway you've proven once again you can't converse on this topic rationally without throwing the insults out, pouting and refusing to answer questions so thats me out.
-
2
-
-
10 minutes ago, jukel123 said:
400? How would the authorities know how many there were? Wasn't that the reason for the change in the law, to keep a track? There must be some who successively applied for a licence? If any of their cats escaped, wouldn't they keep it quiet to keep their licence or avoid punishment?
It's all estimates based on numbers imported and sold but my pal who like I say was one of the biggest dealers at the time reckons at the time of the ban less than 500 were in private hands and the majority of them were either surrendered or the owners got the licence and carried on keeping them legally. As for keeping escapees under wraps well it'd lead to an awkward conversion when it came time for your renewal and inspection and you had one less cat and no proof of where it went.
The fact is the majority of cats sold in the UK never even made it to adulthood, the trade was a constant churn of cubs that were bought by folk who had no way of handling them as they grew and so they'd die of neglect, honestly a really grim trade and I'm glad it was stopped.
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, Greyman said:
Any supporting evidence to that statement or are you just using the stiffy formula of plucking facts from thin air because moggies and dogs don’t leave leopard dna either or feline footprints or kill and consume an entire deer or sheep in one sitting but it sounds better to ignore all those points
My experience being involved with the exotics trade for decades and my pals who were some of the biggest names in importing and dealing in large exotic mammals before and after the ban. How many big cats do you think were in private hands before the ban then?
-
What gets me is there was an absolutely tiny number of cougars and black leopards in private hands when the ban came in (they weren't even the most popular species of big cat to keep) and an even smaller percentage of those cats would have been released into the wild and an even tinier percentage still would have survived but there's apparently breeding populations of both species up and down the country? Just doesn't wash. Standard coloured leopards were far more common in the pet trade (still tiny numbers) than black but you never hear of sightings of them, but of course moggies and dogs don't come in leopard spots...
-
1
-
1
-
-
Putting the good old British market stall selling cheap tat out of business
-
2
-
1
-
-
46 minutes ago, chartpolski said:
Starmer has denied it but I’d bet in the event of a hung Parliament he would form a coalition with the LibDem/SNP/Greens or anyone else that would get him into Number Ten.
Cheers.
They always say that and of course it's always a lie. I don't know if I could see them reaching a formal coalition agreement though, probably more of a confidence and supply arrangement. Would be parliamentary gridlock for the whole term and I reckon that's about the best we can hope for.
-
1
-
R I P. Buck
in Lurchers & Running Dogs
Posted
Just popped on here for the first time in ages and seen this. Really sorry to hear Buck was a real cracker of a dog, I remember you posting him as a wee pup and watched him grow into the fine beast he was always really admired him. Real shame you never got any pups out of him. Hope you're keeping well pal.