Footprint

[PLEDGEY 493]

If that's a little twig by the print I would say it's made by a fox cub. Just behind the 2 claws you can see small indentations from the pads but no rear pads as the foot would still be 'fluffy' back there and wouldn't make too much of an indentation.

 

[charlie caller 3,654]

1 hour ago, PLEDGEY said:

If that's a little twig by the print I would say it's made by a fox cub. Just behind the 2 claws you can see small indentations from the pads but no rear pads as the foot would still be 'fluffy' back there and wouldn't make too much of an indentation.

 

My only reservation about that theory is..... We dont tend to get cubs in March.

[Phill-W68 547]

1 hour ago, PLEDGEY said:

If that's a little twig by the print I would say it's made by a fox cub. Just behind the 2 claws you can see small indentations from the pads but no rear pads as the foot would still be 'fluffy' back there and wouldn't make too much of an indentation.

 

That twig is probably 5"/6" in length... 

[Furrosious ferreter 499]

Have you been walking round bare foot and going in circles...

Fox... running as no back foot print present.

FF

Edited March 14, 2018 by Furrosious ferreter

[steg 609]

[PLEDGEY 493]

I'm sticking with fox. https://www.wildernesscollege.com/fox-tracks.html

  Check out the pics for gaits.

[PLEDGEY 493]

22 hours ago, charlie caller said:

My only reservation about that theory is..... We dont tend to get cubs in March.

True, that twig is a lot bigger than I thought so the print is bigger than I thought as well. Still think it's a fox though :-).