scothunter 12,609 Posted October 21, 2017 Report Share Posted October 21, 2017 He says a lot of stuff does Donald. Dont mean he will follow through. He told reporters he gave a million to a charity for forces he didnt. But when confronted about his bullshit he then wrote a cheque. same as pledging 25k to a father of a killed soldier. Again didn't till the father tweeted hos empty promise. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted October 21, 2017 Report Share Posted October 21, 2017 I've got a feeling the released papers will just be a gigantic anticlimax. There will either be stuff missing or so much that you can't see the wood for the trees and it will just generate even more conspiracy theories. How would anyone even know whether what has been released is even real or red herrings? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted October 21, 2017 Report Share Posted October 21, 2017 Thats very true walshie. Going by previous released files most was blacked out by a marker as it a matter of current national security. Imo we will still be none the wiser. let's face it they are hardly going to risk a lawsuit or a red face if it was a shady goverment conspiracy or even an accident Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 19,323 Posted October 21, 2017 Report Share Posted October 21, 2017 Just got the first leaked document 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 23,685 Posted October 21, 2017 Report Share Posted October 21, 2017 Probably all going to be redacted. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 19,323 Posted October 21, 2017 Report Share Posted October 21, 2017 Probably all going to be redacted. I had to Google redacted ...word of the day : 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jiggy 3,207 Posted October 21, 2017 Report Share Posted October 21, 2017 There is some supposedly very intelligent people who are very naive if they think the CIA left a stack of conspiracy (if there was one)files sitting in an office desk somewhere waiting to be found. That sh1t would be long buried probably before the investigation began. Even if it was Oswald they weren't going to let his (JFKs) private life (who he was banging) get dragged through the mud by releasing everything. At the end of the day they are not protecting the man they are protecting the stability of a nation. Let's leave it here in this drawer for some egotistical reporter to look at in 50 years because he is legally allowed to do so.???. Some times people get shot in the head for no other reason than a guy didn't reach his goals in life but still wanted his name to be famous. It doesn't always have to be political , religious or somebody with a personal grudge. I somehow doubt that THLs finest will solve it, even though some lads put in some very articulate arguments and posts. ? 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted October 21, 2017 Report Share Posted October 21, 2017 Just got the first leaked document Obviously a cover up..... 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jiggy 3,207 Posted October 21, 2017 Report Share Posted October 21, 2017 Just got the first leaked documentObviously a cover up..... I can't believe ye can not see the anomalies in that script. It's so obvious ye are only seeing what they want ye too. I spotted it though. ??? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 19,323 Posted October 23, 2017 Report Share Posted October 23, 2017 I had a feeling Alex would know something...it's actually quite a intresting segment with regards to the release Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JohnGalway 1,043 Posted October 23, 2017 Report Share Posted October 23, 2017 My money is on Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK and Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald. Shocker I know. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JohnGalway 1,043 Posted October 23, 2017 Report Share Posted October 23, 2017 I had a feeling Alex would know something...it's actually quite a intresting segment with regards to the release That fella is the biggest f***ing crank. You'd want to be on crank to believe any of his shite. Look on YouTube for a bit John Oliver done on him, self serving POS. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
waltjnr 5,958 Posted October 27, 2017 Report Share Posted October 27, 2017 what a surprise they are still holding back on some of the files for another 6 months ! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 23,685 Posted October 27, 2017 Report Share Posted October 27, 2017 as he was no Jeremy Kyle 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
KES2 171 Posted October 27, 2017 Report Share Posted October 27, 2017 I must admit that Jack Ruby's explanation of why he shot the assassin always troubled me. Who kills someone in such a situation to avoid the guy's wife having 'to go through the ordeal of a trial'. So unusual and convenient in fact, that it actually looks like a part of or a cover-up itself. Its hard to escape the thought he was a bought killer to hide the truth of any evidence the assassin might divulge. The assassin looked flaky enough to give away some 'truth'. I am sure you know who the assassin was but I am convinced we should deny them remembrance to deny the justification to kill in future. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.