Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Photon Quality Hand Held


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Lamp_Shy

Lamp_Shy

    Born Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts
  • Location:West Scotland

Posted 20 November 2016 - 09:30 am

Out foxing last night, but was difficult with mist coming off a river. Spent a bit of time watching some Red Deer and some really far out on the hill. Back up this morning and used the Zeiss Victorys to check distance - 280 yds & 665yds respectively.

Question; is there a hand held monocular that can get the same level of clarity at these distances? Obviously illumination is critical, as I use an NM800 ON THE Photon.

Anyone?

ATB

PS I have a Bushnell with T50. Works ok, but lacks detail and distance.

Edited by Lamp_Shy, 20 November 2016 - 09:31 am.


#2 some bloke

some bloke

    Born Hunter

  • Donator
  • 125 posts
  • Location:Leicester

Posted 01 December 2016 - 11:58 pm

A problem I think you'll encounter with most monocular's is they are usually fairly high mag - which seems to be what you are asking for - but high mag is very wobbly when held by hand.

 

A lower mag one is better suited to hunting and although its no more steady in the hand, the smaller quarry image is easier to keep acquired on the screen.

 

IMO they mostly suit nocturnal wildlife observers who would more likely be carrying a long tripod rather than a rifle that can provide a much steadier view.



#3 Lamp_Shy

Lamp_Shy

    Born Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts
  • Location:West Scotland

Posted 13 December 2016 - 07:16 pm

A problem I think you'll encounter with most monocular's is they are usually fairly high mag - which seems to be what you are asking for - but high mag is very wobbly when held by hand.
 
A lower mag one is better suited to hunting and although its no more steady in the hand, the smaller quarry image is easier to keep acquired on the screen.
 
IMO they mostly suit nocturnal wildlife observers who would more likely be carrying a long tripod rather than a rifle that can provide a much steadier view.

Thanks SB. And yes, the mag is too high & wobbly.

I just can find anything suitable, other than thermal, but at a few grand, it's cost prohibitive.

Edited by Lamp_Shy, 13 December 2016 - 07:16 pm.


#4 some bloke

some bloke

    Born Hunter

  • Donator
  • 125 posts
  • Location:Leicester

Posted 13 December 2016 - 07:22 pm

 

A problem I think you'll encounter with most monocular's is they are usually fairly high mag - which seems to be what you are asking for - but high mag is very wobbly when held by hand.
 
A lower mag one is better suited to hunting and although its no more steady in the hand, the smaller quarry image is easier to keep acquired on the screen.
 
IMO they mostly suit nocturnal wildlife observers who would more likely be carrying a long tripod rather than a rifle that can provide a much steadier view.

Thanks SB. And yes, the mag is too high & wobbly.

I just can find anything suitable, other than thermal, but at a few grand, it's cost prohibitive.

 

Are you hunting on foot or with a truck?



#5 Lamp_Shy

Lamp_Shy

    Born Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts
  • Location:West Scotland

Posted 13 December 2016 - 07:35 pm


 

A problem I think you'll encounter with most monocular's is they are usually fairly high mag - which seems to be what you are asking for - but high mag is very wobbly when held by hand.
 
A lower mag one is better suited to hunting and although its no more steady in the hand, the smaller quarry image is easier to keep acquired on the screen.
 
IMO they mostly suit nocturnal wildlife observers who would more likely be carrying a long tripod rather than a rifle that can provide a much steadier view.

Thanks SB. And yes, the mag is too high & wobbly.

I just can find anything suitable, other than thermal, but at a few grand, it's cost prohibitive.
 
Are you hunting on foot or with a truck?

On foot mostly...

#6 some bloke

some bloke

    Born Hunter

  • Donator
  • 125 posts
  • Location:Leicester

Posted 13 December 2016 - 08:59 pm

Hmm, I was going to suggest you mount it on your truck to stabilise it. If you use sticks could you rig up a 1/4" 20 tpi tripod adaptor of sorts.

I'd not pursue the 600 capability with a smaller lensed option.

#7 Lamp_Shy

Lamp_Shy

    Born Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts
  • Location:West Scotland

Posted 13 December 2016 - 09:01 pm

Hmm, I was going to suggest you mount it on your truck to stabilise it. If you use sticks could you rig up a 1/4" 20 tpi tripod adaptor of sorts.

I'd not pursue the 600 capability with a smaller lensed option.


Think so, tend to use fence posts & the like. But the Photon with the NM is so much better.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users