Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

EXIF DATA in photographs.


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#16 Guest_Ditch_Shitter_*

Guest_Ditch_Shitter_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 November 2007 - 06:56 pm

Whole place is just becoming more and more Pythonesque. The authorities and their whisperers watching this place must be crippled with laughter by now.

I mean; How many sets of 'Rules' are there now? And who applies Any of them, to All members? :laugh:

What a farce!

#17 RAPID 7

RAPID 7

    Born Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 69 posts

Posted 12 November 2007 - 07:03 pm

THE ONLY THING ITS ILLEGAL TO POST A PIC OF IN G.B IS A DOG ON A BADGER EVERYTHING ELSE IS LEGIT IF YOU CAN EXPLAIN HOW THE ANIMAL CAME TO BE KILLED IF IT WAS A SHOT FOX HARE OR DEER THE DOG IS ALLOWED TO LEGALLY TRACK AND RETREVE THE WOUNDED ANIMAL. LET THE ANTIS SAY AND DO WHAT THEY WANT THEY CANT PROVE THE ANIMAL HASNT BEEN SHOT JUST FROM LOOKING AT A PHOTO :feck:
  • Catcher 1 likes this

#18 Dawn B

Dawn B

    Extreme Hunter

  • Donator
  • 2,148 posts

Posted 12 November 2007 - 07:26 pm

Whole place is just becoming more and more Pythonesque. The authorities and their whisperers watching this place must be crippled with laughter by now.

I mean; How many sets of 'Rules' are there now? And who applies Any of them, to All members? http://www.thehuntinglife.com/forums/pub...

What a farce!

Its not a rule, its a simple warning, make of it what you will.

#19 Crow

Crow

    Mega Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 403 posts
  • Location:Suffolk

Posted 12 November 2007 - 07:31 pm

Dawn, I understand your reasons for posting the information above, but until the idiots stop posting 'pre ban' shots and then following it up with a post stating that the dog in the image was born last January making it 11 months old you're wasting your time.

A bit of common sense on behalf of the poster could save them from more grief than all the technical know-how in the land of IT!

Well done for trying tho, you shouldn't be slated for trying to help ;)

Edited by Crow, 12 November 2007 - 07:32 pm.


#20 Dawn B

Dawn B

    Extreme Hunter

  • Donator
  • 2,148 posts

Posted 12 November 2007 - 07:39 pm

Thanks Crow and I totally agree with you.

#21 Guest_The Big Fish_*

Guest_The Big Fish_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 November 2007 - 08:09 pm

FFS people, all that Dawn has done is too inform you that information stored in digital photographs, can be used against you.

IT NOT A RULE OR LAW :no:

F*ck me, the slightest mention of something that might effect you on here and you all act like fecking children that have had thier sweets taken away from them.

#22 Guest_Ditch_Shitter_*

Guest_Ditch_Shitter_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 November 2007 - 08:12 pm

:rolleyes: Calm down, 'Maggie'. Where did I say ye were attempting to implement any sort of rule yeself?

As it happens, Crow found more time and the mood to state Exactly what I Was driving at.

But none of us will stop the idiots. No one else seems to want to. So .....

#23 Brummy

Brummy

    Extreme Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts
  • Location:Never you fukking mind.

Posted 12 November 2007 - 08:47 pm

Good advice Dawn :thumbs:

Stubby.................. Get a grip !! :wallbash: :doh: :doh:

#24 Guest_baldie_*

Guest_baldie_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 November 2007 - 09:05 pm

Dawn...the phrase "pearls before swine" comes to mind, mi duck. :laugh:

I gave up trying to help folk that dont want it, a loooong time ago.They dont look so clever, stood in the backyard at 5 in the morning, in their jimjam,s when the b*****d squad have kicked in their door, raided their house, and impounded their dogs.
Your a good soul for thinking of others.

#25 IanB

IanB

    ------

  • Administrator
  • 11,139 posts
  • Location:Durham & North Yorks

Posted 12 November 2007 - 09:20 pm

Thanks Dawn, at least the problem has been raised, people can make of it as they will....

#26 Jef66

Jef66

    Born Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • Location:Rugby, UK

Posted 23 September 2008 - 08:55 pm

I'll be sure to strip the EXIF from any pics I post that aren't legal :)

of course i'm such a good boy that i'm sure that'll never happen :) :)

#27 ghillies

ghillies

    Extreme Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,915 posts
  • Location:stafordshire

Posted 30 October 2008 - 08:28 pm

instead of stripping exif can i just strip please?


:clapper:

#28 Red Raven

Red Raven

    Rookie Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Location:Andalucia

Posted 05 November 2009 - 12:06 am

Speaking as a professional photographer, the information you try to remove by stripping the EXIF can still be retrieved with the right software. In short, if you don't want to get in trouble - don't post it on the web. Must be a lot of illegal activity going on here? I only hunt tigers and elephants myself, with a catapult. Haven't found one in the South of England yet but when I do I'll stick a photo up. ;)

#29 martin

martin

    Extreme Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,229 posts
  • Location:Somerset/Wiltshire Border

Posted 05 November 2009 - 11:18 pm

It's $50.00 to buy isn't it?? :blink:

#30 Red Raven

Red Raven

    Rookie Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Location:Andalucia

Posted 07 November 2009 - 03:35 pm

You can't buy it as it is not available to the general public, it's a bit like trying to buy a nuclear weapon




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users