C556 351 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 I think the Bible's best read as an allegory rather than a set of laws that have to be followed, interpreted by each person on it's own merits. Do that and you might live a more virtuous life, be less worried about death, and take a less extreme view of religion. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 yes I agree it has been COPIED not changed, big difference,many times but the first scripture(bible) was wrote in hebrew,the king james bible is word for word translation from hebrew to english.its the only one I use,the rest of bibles words have been changed slightly l no I study them looking for changes.now its WORDS that have been changed not sentences or paragraphs.now if you want go get a few diff bibles an read them 99.9% same except few word changes by man.so can anyone tell me any.so has anyone real evidences to disprove king james bible atb Link to post Share on other sites
BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 ok c5 you go ahead steal lie murder if it keeps you happy bigman,never you worry about the laws,but dont come crying when you affected by them atb Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 Havnt scientists proved how earth was created and it wasn't anything to do with god ........ 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Brewman 1,190 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 Just to put a spanner or three in the works, what about the parting of the dead sea, the ark with just 2 of each animal how did he feed them all? Moses must have been some hefty fella carting those slabs down a mountain or Samson and all those stories. All those authors would be pullitzer prize winners these days. Their hooch must have been something special. If their is a god why do paedophiles exist and millions of children dieing. More holes than a leaky sieve with the bible is true argument. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Hareydave 1,214 Posted August 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 does science not prove its bollox Link to post Share on other sites
The one 8,396 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 I don't mind folk believing in god etc as long as there no trying to force there beliefs on me Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 And what about the controversy of Lilith ....... 2 Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 12,387 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 (edited) Written in Hebrew you say??? So the fact they have found tablets and art etc dating way older than most Hebrew texts in ancient Sumerian and other very ancient curiform texts telling the same STORIES. Plus the king James bible isn't a direct word for word translation from Hebrew texts because it is impossible to translate word for word into English from Hebrew as it would make about as much sense as every bible basherin the world..... None! Edited August 11, 2014 by mushroom 1 Link to post Share on other sites
BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 no socks its the other way about the bible stands to scientific scrutiny evoloution hasnt got a shred of evidence,all works of the adversary Link to post Share on other sites
BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 for a start men of god did not drink alcohol,forsecond noah was 600 when he built the ark he was very smart an it was two of every kind not species,noah was more than capable of feeding them he was 600.people lived to 900 before the flood Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 12,387 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 FLMAO you have made my evening lol 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Hareydave 1,214 Posted August 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 wasn't built in Belfast then Link to post Share on other sites
norseman 424 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 im not getting embroiled in the whole god science argument, but has science actually proved the start so to speak? I know that they've proved the making of matter /anti matter criac, but I cant believe everything a scientist says either. I do believe they probably are near enough. some people treat science like a religion though which is no different to religion. p.s I was raised catholic, I respect others beliefs. but I lost the faith years ago. and im not fully aware of all the scientific evidence so don't jump down my throat. but im interested in science as a whole. so if someone can enlighten me as for the "start" please do so Link to post Share on other sites
BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 11, 2014 Report Share Posted August 11, 2014 I beleive in the beginning god,evoloution beleives in the beginning dirt haha evoloution is a dangerous religon it teaches kids that your nothing more than an animal an we wonder why soceity is f****d Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts