Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Recommended Posts

:yes::thumbs:

 

Ok Cheers, I see where you are coming from!

 

Seems reasonable, the only possibly slight counter argument (I'm not suggesting it is a good one) is, First grant, No experience...here's a .308 because the land is cleared for it! :hmm: :hmm:

 

:thumbs:

Share this post


Link to post

:yes::thumbs:

 

Ok Cheers, I see where you are coming from!

 

Seems reasonable, the only possibly slight counter argument (I'm not suggesting it is a good one) is, First grant, No experience...here's a .308 because the land is cleared for it! :hmm: :hmm:

 

:thumbs:

my thoughts would be. you either deemed responsible enough to hold an fac or not as saying theres a difference would imply that different levels of responsibility are required for each calibre, would that mean a lad with a rimmy is deemed to be less responsible than a bloke with a 308 :hmm:

Share this post


Link to post

 

:yes::thumbs:

 

Ok Cheers, I see where you are coming from!

 

Seems reasonable, the only possibly slight counter argument (I'm not suggesting it is a good one) is, First grant, No experience...here's a .308 because the land is cleared for it! :hmm: :hmm:

 

:thumbs:

my thoughts would be. you either deemed responsible enough to hold an fac or not as saying theres a difference would imply that different levels of responsibility are required for each calibre, would that mean a lad with a rimmy is deemed to be less responsible than a bloke with a 308 :hmm:

 

:yes: :yes:

 

As I said, but we live in the real world, and not all regions share our view! We hear tales of calibre restriction/mentoring all the time due to perceived lack of experience!

Share this post


Link to post

 

 

:yes::thumbs:

 

Ok Cheers, I see where you are coming from!

 

Seems reasonable, the only possibly slight counter argument (I'm not suggesting it is a good one) is, First grant, No experience...here's a .308 because the land is cleared for it! :hmm: :hmm:

 

:thumbs:

my thoughts would be. you either deemed responsible enough to hold an fac or not as saying theres a difference would imply that different levels of responsibility are required for each calibre, would that mean a lad with a rimmy is deemed to be less responsible than a bloke with a 308 :hmm:

 

:yes: :yes:

 

As I said, but we live in the real world, and not all regions share our view! We hear tales of calibre restriction/mentoring all the time due to perceived lack of experience!

 

therein lies the problem firearms licensing is not standardised across the country and is subject to interpretation of guidelines.

Share this post


Link to post

therein lies the problem firearms licensing is not standardised across the country and is subject to interpretation of guidelines.

 

:yes: :yes:

Share this post


Link to post

then you can buy a a ,22 calibre rifle and a.22 sound moderator with 500 rounds of expanding .22 ammo and keep 600 in you safe

Share this post


Link to post

I know what you're saying Dek, it's just as Paulus said, in an sensible world, the guidelines would be statutory for every force in E&W.

 

Deerhound, go out and buy one of these - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.22_Eargesplitten_Loudenboomer

 

Give the licensing manager a heart attack. It is after all, just a .22 Rifle.

Share this post


Link to post

 

 

:yes::thumbs:

 

Ok Cheers, I see where you are coming from!

 

Seems reasonable, the only possibly slight counter argument (I'm not suggesting it is a good one) is, First grant, No experience...here's a .308 because the land is cleared for it! :hmm: :hmm:

 

:thumbs:

my thoughts would be. you either deemed responsible enough to hold an fac or not as saying theres a difference would imply that different levels of responsibility are required for each calibre, would that mean a lad with a rimmy is deemed to be less responsible than a bloke with a 308 :hmm:

LAD with a rimmy and a BLOKE with a .308

Share this post


Link to post

 

 

:yes::thumbs:

 

Ok Cheers, I see where you are coming from!

 

Seems reasonable, the only possibly slight counter argument (I'm not suggesting it is a good one) is, First grant, No experience...here's a .308 because the land is cleared for it! :hmm: :hmm:

 

:thumbs:

my thoughts would be. you either deemed responsible enough to hold an fac or not as saying theres a difference would imply that different levels of responsibility are required for each calibre, would that mean a lad with a rimmy is deemed to be less responsible than a bloke with a 308 :hmm:

LAD with a rimmy and a BLOKE with a .308

 

simple fact is. you are either suitable or not for the granting of an fac. its the grey areas that have got us into the mess were in now, stick to black and white across the board, what makes a bloke with a 308 more or less capable of owning it than a lad after all theres plenty of lads in war zones

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×