I gave an honest and true opinion, just as any RESONSIBLE person would have done when you had not named the person you had directed your post to. This forum is NOT you personal messaging page.
My response to it was not directed at you so your response to it was unwarranted, insulting and displays a possible level of guilt and immaturity.
I sound like a tool? It is better to sound like a tool than be like you and act and write like one!
Generally a post below someone is directed at them, hence my original post that was for moles attention since it was below his, if I'd been asking a question for your attention I'd have actually quoted your post directly or named you.
Therefore to clarify, I've actually quoted your post to enable you to understand for whom it's attention it is directed towards this time.
No guilt is felt here and my attention span thusly hasn't been dramatically diminished by undaunting thoughts of having committed a faux pas.
My level of immaturity is unchanged and I shall endeavour to keep it in check next time.....
However since my visits here are infrequent and subject to whimsical fancies I could be charged as a interloper.
You therefore might find my responses not quite at the expected levels of your mastery.