Jump to content


- - - - -

picker up wanted


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#31 samearl14

samearl14

    Mega Hunter

  • Donator
  • 399 posts
  • Location:Cambridge

Posted 19 September 2011 - 05:49 pm

If a bloke had a staff that i had seen working as well as what i read about 'mushrooms' id have no problems having it on the shoot. Plus it has a certain novelty factor that i find quite appealing :thumbs:

#32 Ideation

Ideation

    Jesus Like Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,040 posts
  • Location:Middle of nowhere, South Wales

Posted 24 September 2011 - 07:52 pm

Having just read through this, i would like to point out that "John" and "semiautolee" are just making members of the shooting fraternity sound / look like a bunch of close minded, arrogant, rude and fairly dim arseholes.

Aye Mushroom replied offering the services of his staffie, and that is somewhat unorthodox, and was always likely to get turned down.

HOWEVER, what exactly in his offer prompted the need for John to start insulting him? And then call Redcharge a 'wanker' when he backed Mushroom up?

And semiautolee - listen to yourself?

"if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter!"

You sound like an idiot mate. Lets get this straight, as a dog is not the 'natural' dog for the job, you would not having it do said job, regardless of the skill with which the job was performed? SO in short, you care not for the quality of work that the dog does, but rather for the way the dog looks? Says it all really. You just sound like ANOTHER pompus shooter.

As for "neither will anyone else for that matter" - you are simply wrong, many many shoots, are willing to welcome unorthodox breeds of dogs as long as they prove themselves in the working field.

And finally - i would not have a semi-auto on my shoot.

So FECK OFF.

#33 albert64

albert64

    Extreme Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,164 posts

Posted 24 September 2011 - 08:24 pm

wonder why john who comes across as an arrogant prick
while the rest of us are mere wankers
does'nt know anybody who would be willing to pick up for him?
do you think its because he thinks so much of himself
and very little of others
  • Ideation likes this

#34 timber

timber

    Born Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 220 posts
  • Location:lancs

Posted 24 September 2011 - 08:39 pm

wonder why john who comes across as an arrogant prick
while the rest of us are mere wankers
does'nt know anybody who would be willing to pick up for him?
do you think its because he thinks so much of himself
and very little of others

yeah if he has to advertise for a picker up ................enough said

#35 semiautolee

semiautolee

    Born Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts
  • Location:DURHAM

Posted 24 September 2011 - 08:49 pm

Having just read through this, i would like to point out that "John" and "semiautolee" are just making members of the shooting fraternity sound / look like a bunch of close minded, arrogant, rude and fairly dim arseholes.

Aye Mushroom replied offering the services of his staffie, and that is somewhat unorthodox, and was always likely to get turned down.

HOWEVER, what exactly in his offer prompted the need for John to start insulting him? And then call Redcharge a 'wanker' when he backed Mushroom up?

And semiautolee - listen to yourself?

"if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter!"

You sound like an idiot mate. Lets get this straight, as a dog is not the 'natural' dog for the job, you would not having it do said job, regardless of the skill with which the job was performed? SO in short, you care not for the quality of work that the dog does, but rather for the way the dog looks? Says it all really. You just sound like ANOTHER pompus shooter.

As for "neither will anyone else for that matter" - you are simply wrong, many many shoots, are willing to welcome unorthodox breeds of dogs as long as they prove themselves in the working field.

And finally - i would not have a semi-auto on my shoot.

So FECK OFF.


do i give a toss about your shoot no!!!!!!!!!!!!

#36 Ideation

Ideation

    Jesus Like Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,040 posts
  • Location:Middle of nowhere, South Wales

Posted 24 September 2011 - 08:50 pm


Having just read through this, i would like to point out that "John" and "semiautolee" are just making members of the shooting fraternity sound / look like a bunch of close minded, arrogant, rude and fairly dim arseholes.

Aye Mushroom replied offering the services of his staffie, and that is somewhat unorthodox, and was always likely to get turned down.

HOWEVER, what exactly in his offer prompted the need for John to start insulting him? And then call Redcharge a 'wanker' when he backed Mushroom up?

And semiautolee - listen to yourself?

"if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter!"

You sound like an idiot mate. Lets get this straight, as a dog is not the 'natural' dog for the job, you would not having it do said job, regardless of the skill with which the job was performed? SO in short, you care not for the quality of work that the dog does, but rather for the way the dog looks? Says it all really. You just sound like ANOTHER pompus shooter.

As for "neither will anyone else for that matter" - you are simply wrong, many many shoots, are willing to welcome unorthodox breeds of dogs as long as they prove themselves in the working field.

And finally - i would not have a semi-auto on my shoot.

So FECK OFF.


do i give a toss about your shoot no!!!!!!!!!!!!


And in only nine words you manage to confirm just how much of an idiot you are . . . .

#37 mushroom

mushroom

    Professional Matadwarf

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,372 posts
  • Location:Barcelona

Posted 24 September 2011 - 08:51 pm

Having just read through this, i would like to point out that "John" and "semiautolee" are just making members of the shooting fraternity sound / look like a bunch of close minded, arrogant, rude and fairly dim arseholes.

Aye Mushroom replied offering the services of his staffie, and that is somewhat unorthodox, and was always likely to get turned down.

HOWEVER, what exactly in his offer prompted the need for John to start insulting him? And then call Redcharge a 'wanker' when he backed Mushroom up?

And semiautolee - listen to yourself?

"if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter!"

You sound like an idiot mate. Lets get this straight, as a dog is not the 'natural' dog for the job, you would not having it do said job, regardless of the skill with which the job was performed? SO in short, you care not for the quality of work that the dog does, but rather for the way the dog looks? Says it all really. You just sound like ANOTHER pompus shooter.

As for "neither will anyone else for that matter" - you are simply wrong, many many shoots, are willing to welcome unorthodox breeds of dogs as long as they prove themselves in the working field.

And finally - i would not have a semi-auto on my shoot.

So FECK OFF.


For some reason reading this just brings images of the episode of Only fools and horses where Del turns up with the semi :laugh: :laugh:

#38 semiautolee

semiautolee

    Born Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts
  • Location:DURHAM

Posted 24 September 2011 - 08:51 pm



Having just read through this, i would like to point out that "John" and "semiautolee" are just making members of the shooting fraternity sound / look like a bunch of close minded, arrogant, rude and fairly dim arseholes.

Aye Mushroom replied offering the services of his staffie, and that is somewhat unorthodox, and was always likely to get turned down.

HOWEVER, what exactly in his offer prompted the need for John to start insulting him? And then call Redcharge a 'wanker' when he backed Mushroom up?

And semiautolee - listen to yourself?

"if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter!"

You sound like an idiot mate. Lets get this straight, as a dog is not the 'natural' dog for the job, you would not having it do said job, regardless of the skill with which the job was performed? SO in short, you care not for the quality of work that the dog does, but rather for the way the dog looks? Says it all really. You just sound like ANOTHER pompus shooter.

As for "neither will anyone else for that matter" - you are simply wrong, many many shoots, are willing to welcome unorthodox breeds of dogs as long as they prove themselves in the working field.

And finally - i would not have a semi-auto on my shoot.

So FECK OFF.


do i give a toss about your shoot no!!!!!!!!!!!!


And in only nine words you manage to confirm just how much of an idiot you are . . . .


bit like you then eh!!!

#39 poacher3161

poacher3161

    Extreme Hunter

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,199 posts
  • Location:Tony Capstick Country

Posted 24 September 2011 - 08:53 pm



Having just read through this, i would like to point out that "John" and "semiautolee" are just making members of the shooting fraternity sound / look like a bunch of close minded, arrogant, rude and fairly dim arseholes.

Aye Mushroom replied offering the services of his staffie, and that is somewhat unorthodox, and was always likely to get turned down.

HOWEVER, what exactly in his offer prompted the need for John to start insulting him? And then call Redcharge a 'wanker' when he backed Mushroom up?

And semiautolee - listen to yourself?

"if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter!"

You sound like an idiot mate. Lets get this straight, as a dog is not the 'natural' dog for the job, you would not having it do said job, regardless of the skill with which the job was performed? SO in short, you care not for the quality of work that the dog does, but rather for the way the dog looks? Says it all really. You just sound like ANOTHER pompus shooter.

As for "neither will anyone else for that matter" - you are simply wrong, many many shoots, are willing to welcome unorthodox breeds of dogs as long as they prove themselves in the working field.

And finally - i would not have a semi-auto on my shoot.

So FECK OFF.


do i give a toss about your shoot no!!!!!!!!!!!!


And in only nine words you manage to confirm just how much of an idiot you are . . . .

But their typical of the shooting fraternaty i have come accross why the fekin hell do you think i have poached all my life i carnt waite for the leaves to drop lol.

#40 Ideation

Ideation

    Jesus Like Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,040 posts
  • Location:Middle of nowhere, South Wales

Posted 25 September 2011 - 02:04 pm




Having just read through this, i would like to point out that "John" and "semiautolee" are just making members of the shooting fraternity sound / look like a bunch of close minded, arrogant, rude and fairly dim arseholes.

Aye Mushroom replied offering the services of his staffie, and that is somewhat unorthodox, and was always likely to get turned down.

HOWEVER, what exactly in his offer prompted the need for John to start insulting him? And then call Redcharge a 'wanker' when he backed Mushroom up?

And semiautolee - listen to yourself?

"if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter!"

You sound like an idiot mate. Lets get this straight, as a dog is not the 'natural' dog for the job, you would not having it do said job, regardless of the skill with which the job was performed? SO in short, you care not for the quality of work that the dog does, but rather for the way the dog looks? Says it all really. You just sound like ANOTHER pompus shooter.

As for "neither will anyone else for that matter" - you are simply wrong, many many shoots, are willing to welcome unorthodox breeds of dogs as long as they prove themselves in the working field.

And finally - i would not have a semi-auto on my shoot.

So FECK OFF.


do i give a toss about your shoot no!!!!!!!!!!!!


And in only nine words you manage to confirm just how much of an idiot you are . . . .


bit like you then eh!!!


Mate. . . . your come-backs are shit, and they don't even make sense haha. Give your self a good slap and grow up!

(I also notice you don't have an answer for any of the points in my initial reply)

#41 Ideation

Ideation

    Jesus Like Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,040 posts
  • Location:Middle of nowhere, South Wales

Posted 25 September 2011 - 02:07 pm




Having just read through this, i would like to point out that "John" and "semiautolee" are just making members of the shooting fraternity sound / look like a bunch of close minded, arrogant, rude and fairly dim arseholes.

Aye Mushroom replied offering the services of his staffie, and that is somewhat unorthodox, and was always likely to get turned down.

HOWEVER, what exactly in his offer prompted the need for John to start insulting him? And then call Redcharge a 'wanker' when he backed Mushroom up?

And semiautolee - listen to yourself?

"if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter!"

You sound like an idiot mate. Lets get this straight, as a dog is not the 'natural' dog for the job, you would not having it do said job, regardless of the skill with which the job was performed? SO in short, you care not for the quality of work that the dog does, but rather for the way the dog looks? Says it all really. You just sound like ANOTHER pompus shooter.

As for "neither will anyone else for that matter" - you are simply wrong, many many shoots, are willing to welcome unorthodox breeds of dogs as long as they prove themselves in the working field.

And finally - i would not have a semi-auto on my shoot.

So FECK OFF.


do i give a toss about your shoot no!!!!!!!!!!!!


And in only nine words you manage to confirm just how much of an idiot you are . . . .

But their typical of the shooting fraternaty i have come accross why the fekin hell do you think i have poached all my life i carnt waite for the leaves to drop lol.


You are right in many ways Del, but luckily they are not all like that, there are some good, honest, working class folk involved in shooting, who also appreciate other forms of fieldsports etc. We are lucky to have free reign on some good syndicate / shoot land.

#42 semiautolee

semiautolee

    Born Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts
  • Location:DURHAM

Posted 25 September 2011 - 02:12 pm





Having just read through this, i would like to point out that "John" and "semiautolee" are just making members of the shooting fraternity sound / look like a bunch of close minded, arrogant, rude and fairly dim arseholes.

Aye Mushroom replied offering the services of his staffie, and that is somewhat unorthodox, and was always likely to get turned down.

HOWEVER, what exactly in his offer prompted the need for John to start insulting him? And then call Redcharge a 'wanker' when he backed Mushroom up?

And semiautolee - listen to yourself?

"if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter!"

You sound like an idiot mate. Lets get this straight, as a dog is not the 'natural' dog for the job, you would not having it do said job, regardless of the skill with which the job was performed? SO in short, you care not for the quality of work that the dog does, but rather for the way the dog looks? Says it all really. You just sound like ANOTHER pompus shooter.

As for "neither will anyone else for that matter" - you are simply wrong, many many shoots, are willing to welcome unorthodox breeds of dogs as long as they prove themselves in the working field.

And finally - i would not have a semi-auto on my shoot.

So FECK OFF.


do i give a toss about your shoot no!!!!!!!!!!!!

And in only nine words you manage to confirm just how much of an idiot you are . . . .

bit like you then eh!!!

Mate. . . . your come-backs are shit, and they don't even make sense haha. Give your self a good slap and grow up!

(I also notice you don't have an answer for any of the points in my initial reply)

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

#43 bullmastiff

bullmastiff

    Extreme Hunter

  • Donator
  • 2,330 posts
  • Location:South Somerset

Posted 25 September 2011 - 02:20 pm

seriously guys, if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter! john did say no stupid comments, but what did he get a stupid comment on his genuine post trying to help people out with a good oppurtunity for someone to work there dog and have a good day out and get a bit of cash for helping out!! forums dont need stupid comments like my staffy can do the job etc etc on this kind of posts when you no you wont get anywhere!! enough said i think!!


So you don't let Spanials pick up or labs/retrievers in the beating line then......

#44 bullmastiff

bullmastiff

    Extreme Hunter

  • Donator
  • 2,330 posts
  • Location:South Somerset

Posted 25 September 2011 - 02:35 pm

...

#45 danw

danw

    Extreme Hunter

  • Donator
  • 3,132 posts

Posted 25 September 2011 - 03:05 pm




Having just read through this, i would like to point out that "John" and "semiautolee" are just making members of the shooting fraternity sound / look like a bunch of close minded, arrogant, rude and fairly dim arseholes.

Aye Mushroom replied offering the services of his staffie, and that is somewhat unorthodox, and was always likely to get turned down.

HOWEVER, what exactly in his offer prompted the need for John to start insulting him? And then call Redcharge a 'wanker' when he backed Mushroom up?

And semiautolee - listen to yourself?

"if it was me i wouldnt want a staffy running around my shoot picking birds it isnt the natural dog for the job, maybe he or she can do the job but i wouldnt want it on my land, and neither will anyone else for that matter!"

You sound like an idiot mate. Lets get this straight, as a dog is not the 'natural' dog for the job, you would not having it do said job, regardless of the skill with which the job was performed? SO in short, you care not for the quality of work that the dog does, but rather for the way the dog looks? Says it all really. You just sound like ANOTHER pompus shooter.

As for "neither will anyone else for that matter" - you are simply wrong, many many shoots, are willing to welcome unorthodox breeds of dogs as long as they prove themselves in the working field.

And finally - i would not have a semi-auto on my shoot.

So FECK OFF.


do i give a toss about your shoot no!!!!!!!!!!!!

And in only nine words you manage to confirm just how much of an idiot you are . . . .
But their typical of the shooting fraternaty i have come accross why the fekin hell do you think i have poached all my life i carnt waite for my balls to drop lol.

Edited for accuracy :laugh: :laugh:


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users