jordang 0 Posted October 19, 2009 Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 I have to disagree on leupolds and low light, imo they are certainly no better than nightforce ( in fact I would goes as far as to say i would rather use a nightforce than leupold any day of the week; although I havent looked through one of the new range) and certainly nowhere near the league of schmidts, swaro's and zeiss... hence its better to try a few to see how your eyes get on with them. Quote Link to post
SNAP SHOT 194 Posted October 19, 2009 Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 I have to disagree on leupolds and low light, imo they are certainly no better than nightforce ( in fact I would goes as far as to say i would rather use a nightforce than leupold any day of the week; although I havent looked through one of the new range) and certainly nowhere near the league of schmidts, swaro's and zeiss... hence its better to try a few to see how your eyes get on with them. i had a mate buy a nightforce for stalking we went out one morning and he couldn't see the deer through his scope... while i could clearly make them out with the leupold..... he sold it the following week............ Snap. Quote Link to post
RicW 67 Posted October 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 I have to disagree on leupolds and low light, imo they are certainly no better than nightforce ( in fact I would goes as far as to say i would rather use a nightforce than leupold any day of the week; although I havent looked through one of the new range) and certainly nowhere near the league of schmidts, swaro's and zeiss... hence its better to try a few to see how your eyes get on with them. i had a mate buy a nightforce for stalking we went out one morning and he couldn't see the deer through his scope... while i could clearly make them out with the leupold..... he sold it the following week............ Snap. Tho we're getting a bit off thread here I LURV this argument. I like the idea of Kahles as low light level scopes. They make a main point of using glass which transmits the wavelengths to which the human eye is most sensitive at low intensity. Don't like their reticles tho. By the way, a "reticule" is a handbag . . . Ric Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.