FJager
-
Content Count
542 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Wants in with the Royal Australian Regiment, was told no camel rooters allowed.
-
Fancy a ginger beer giving lip, if your not infantry your not sh#t and as for Stabs and his sh#tty green beret, its maroon, all the way!
-
Ah yes, all true, paticularly most of your sister-in-laws, or is that most of 1 sister-in-law.
-
My opinion here will differ quiet a lot from from what people in the UK will suggest, however a good 6x scope mounted on a lightweight rifle in .243( I see this is what you have put in for)shooting a pointed soft point projectile preferrably at the heavier end of the scale for .243 will do the job just nicely. As for head or chest shot, that is up to you, both will kill, the head shot though is definitely no nonsense, but can be harder to achieve. Obviously a head shot does not require the pointed soft point. As for the 100 grain being needed, no, it is not, a 55 grainer out of a centr
-
Just about any centrefire calibre has the potential to do a lot of meat damage, the projectile and shot placement is what determines how much meat you will be feeding to your dogs. Don't let anyone tell you that the .308 isn't flat shooting, at 300 it is not that much different the .270, which is renowned for being a flat shooter. As I said before though, the .30 cal kills better. Europeans don't seem to like the .270 as they say it kicks too much, this is rubbish. Yeah the .308 is a little milder but there is not a whole lot of difference here either. With the shorter action of the .308 thou
-
Until recently I had used a .270 as my main deer hunting rifle, however the opportunity came up not long back to purchase a Rem Mohawk in .308, I can catergorically say that the .308, despite nearly identical ballistics on paper kills deer better.
-
Is he a wild free range stag? Not being clever, but in all honesty the 5 10" bloke only coming up to his rump, would like to see that, we breed bos indicus cattle and at 1200 kg, they are lucky to be that tall.
